Page 15 of 65 FirstFirst ... 511121314151617181925 ... LastLast
Results 141 to 150 of 648

Thread: Scytho-Turkic Z93 branch Z2125 vs. Indo-Aryan migration theory

  1. #141
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Online
    11-16-2023 @ 05:04 AM
    Location
    In a remote province of the Planet of the Apes...
    Meta-Ethnicity
    European
    Ethnicity
    Romanian
    Country
    Romania
    Religion
    Christianity
    Gender
    Posts
    10,106
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 5,706/145
    Given: 8,303/305

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Ossetian is East Iranic language as well and not in the same Iranic subgroup as Persian. Well for sure they must be in part Caucasic people too, as must have been the Alans too, even though not at first.

  2. #142
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Last Online
    01-06-2021 @ 03:29 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Semitic
    Ethnicity
    Levantine
    Country
    Palestine
    Y-DNA
    J2
    mtDNA
    U3
    Taxonomy
    Taurid
    Relationship Status
    In a relationship
    Gender
    Posts
    29,275
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 29,760/1,198
    Given: 24,478/603

    -1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Foreigner View Post
    Ossetian is East Iranic language as well and not in the same Iranic subgroup as Persian. Well for sure they must be in part Caucasic people too, as must have been the Alans too, even though not at first.
    "The Y-haplogroup data indicate that North Ossetians are more similar to other North Caucasian groups, and South Ossetians are more similar to other South Caucasian groups, than to each other. Also, with respect to mtDNA, Ossetians are significantly more similar to Iranian groups than to Caucasian groups. It is thus suggested that there is a common origin of Ossetians from Iran, followed by subsequent male-mediated migrations from their Caucasian neighbours"
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...131.x/abstract
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15598217

    Ossetians are a mixture between a Caucasian father and an Iranic(Alan) mother. So much for them in being Turkic or any of that nonsense.

  3. #143
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Online
    11-16-2023 @ 05:04 AM
    Location
    In a remote province of the Planet of the Apes...
    Meta-Ethnicity
    European
    Ethnicity
    Romanian
    Country
    Romania
    Religion
    Christianity
    Gender
    Posts
    10,106
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 5,706/145
    Given: 8,303/305

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilgamesh900 View Post
    I was talking about Turanians who keep claiming that the Scythians, Sarmatians, Parthians and etc were Turkic, and linguists confirm that they are a iranic people. Scythians were long gone before the Slavs settled in what is now Russia, Ukraine and etc, and genetically, all slavic peoples, with the exception of southern slavs, are genetically close to one another.
    In Coon's chapter on Scytho-Sarmatians he does mention the existence of one theory that they spoke Turkic and were Europo-Mongoloid mix or Mongoloids, but he dismises this idea. He also says Ossetes are mix of Alans and native Caucasians.

  4. #144
    ♥╭╮♥ KawaiiKawaii's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Last Online
    01-14-2015 @ 06:17 PM
    Ethnicity
    ♥‿♥
    Country
    Switzerland
    Gender
    Posts
    2,185
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 2,208/284
    Given: 2,385/67

    3 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Duke View Post
    I have posted link that proves that ossetians have nothing to do with scythians, its a myth.

    Sythians in eastern parts(asia) had male East euro ancestry, and some were mixed with asians, but they are not Ossetians.

    Ossetians are Caucasus people, scythians were large group that spread from germania all the way to asia, same like slavs today
    They have everything to do with them: they speak a language that is a descendant of Scythian.

  5. #145
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Online
    11-16-2023 @ 05:04 AM
    Location
    In a remote province of the Planet of the Apes...
    Meta-Ethnicity
    European
    Ethnicity
    Romanian
    Country
    Romania
    Religion
    Christianity
    Gender
    Posts
    10,106
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 5,706/145
    Given: 8,303/305

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilgamesh900 View Post
    "The Y-haplogroup data indicate that North Ossetians are more similar to other North Caucasian groups, and South Ossetians are more similar to other South Caucasian groups, than to each other. Also, with respect to mtDNA, Ossetians are significantly more similar to Iranian groups than to Caucasian groups. It is thus suggested that there is a common origin of Ossetians from Iran, followed by subsequent male-mediated migrations from their Caucasian neighbours"
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/1...131.x/abstract
    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15598217

    Ossetians are a mixture between a Caucasian father and an Iranic(Alan) mother. So much for them in being Turkic or any of that nonsense.
    Hm, this seems fishy or very surprising anyway. Why the mother Alan? Weren't they the rulling or dominant tribe in the region and a warrior people? Also why Iran? Iranics originate in northern Central Asia, from where they also spread to Iran and Eastern Europe and the North Caucasus or so it is usually believed. Iranians in Iran have proto-Iranic admixture which was European, but are more West Asian/Middle Eastern by blood.

  6. #146
    Veteran Member Duke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Last Online
    10-25-2025 @ 08:20 AM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Croatian
    Country
    Croatia
    Region
    Dalmatia
    Gender
    Posts
    4,232
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 1,369/78
    Given: 558/28

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Foreigner View Post
    Ossetian is East Iranic language as well and not in the same Iranic subgroup as Persian. Well for sure they must be in part Caucasic people too, as must have been the Alans too, even though not at first.
    Alans maybehave been in south poland, and there is no genetic link with ossetians

    This is reallity

    http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/sh...skeletons.html


    It's a warriors' tomb, but we now know it says more about culture than conquest. It contains ancient Scythian skeletons discovered in the Altai mountains of Mongolia in 2005, and their DNA is part of the first hard evidence of genetic blending between Europe and Asia.

    Researchers at the Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain, extracted mitochondrial DNA from the bones and teeth of skeletons found in the mountains. Bronze-Age skeletons, dating from the seventh to the 10th century BC, showed no sign of mixed lineages: those from the western side of the mountain range were European, and those from the eastern side were Asian. However, come the Iron Age - seventh to second centuries BC - and the coming of the Scythian culture, and the skeletons display a neat 50-50 blend of lineages.

    The Scythians were already known to be the first large Eurasian culture, but were believed to be the product of migration from Europe. The researchers now suggest that the genetic blending is actually a result of the expansion of Scythian culture over the mountains.

    That culture was based on nomadic pasturing and horse breeding - as you may have guessed from the presence of a horse alongside humans in this tomb.

    Scythians weren't confirmed to exist in east Asia before this tomb and others were found in 2005 in the Altai mountains, where Russia, China, Mongolia and Kazakhstan share borders. In ancient times the mountain range prevented cultural and genetic blending, dividing the Asian and European populations until the Scythian culture expanded from the west.

    tl:dr
    Most eastern fringe part of Scythia is where Russian like people mixed with Mongol like people after Iron age

  7. #147
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    06-23-2022 @ 03:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    A
    Country
    Antarctica
    Religion
    Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    839
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 747/166
    Given: 1,145/208

    5 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KawaiiKawaii View Post
    They have everything to do with them: they speak a language that is a descendant of Scythian.
    the scythians and sarmatians of europe spoke northeastern iranic languages and ossetian is the descendant of one of them. So they are scythian /sarmatian regardless of their genes. But the saka of khotan and central asia spoke spoke southeastern iranic languages and they left many buddhist manuscripts. Their language is more related to modern sarikoli, , wakhi, pashto and other southeastern iranic languages. None of their languages had turkic infuences and only very late turks migrated from mongolia to western central asia and displaced the native iranic population there

  8. #148
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Last Online
    01-06-2021 @ 03:29 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Semitic
    Ethnicity
    Levantine
    Country
    Palestine
    Y-DNA
    J2
    mtDNA
    U3
    Taxonomy
    Taurid
    Relationship Status
    In a relationship
    Gender
    Posts
    29,275
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 29,760/1,198
    Given: 24,478/603

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Foreigner View Post
    Hm, this seems fishy or very surprising anyway. Why the mother Alan? Weren't they the rulling or dominant tribe in the region and a warrior people? Also why Iran? Iranics originate in northern Central Asia, from where they also spread to Iran and Eastern Europe and the North Caucasus or so it is usually believed. Iranians in Iran have proto-Iranic admixture which was European, but are more West Asian/Middle Eastern by blood.
    Well, the Alans suffered a lot by the hand of the tatar barbarians, and many of their men died fighting for their people while many women were left behind. There is an cultural myth about the origins of the ossetian people on how an Alanic mother(forgot her name) rescued many children from the hand of the mongols. It makes sense that they would start mixing with caucasian males to keep their people alive.

  9. #149
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Last Online
    11-16-2023 @ 05:04 AM
    Location
    In a remote province of the Planet of the Apes...
    Meta-Ethnicity
    European
    Ethnicity
    Romanian
    Country
    Romania
    Religion
    Christianity
    Gender
    Posts
    10,106
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 5,706/145
    Given: 8,303/305

    2 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Not sure what your point was Duke. The Ossetes are not pure Scythians or Sarmatians, but a mix of that and native Caucasians. Their language is Iranic and they were once known as Alans. Their history in the region is well documented. They are a Sarmatian tribe basically. I think they look between Caucasics and Slavs and a bit like Balkanics, being the lightest group in their region.

  10. #150
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Last Online
    06-23-2022 @ 03:42 PM
    Ethnicity
    A
    Country
    Antarctica
    Religion
    Orthodox
    Gender
    Posts
    839
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 747/166
    Given: 1,145/208

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Foreigner View Post
    Hm, this seems fishy or very surprising anyway. Why the mother Alan? Weren't they the rulling or dominant tribe in the region and a warrior people? Also why Iran? Iranics originate in northern Central Asia, from where they also spread to Iran and Eastern Europe and the North Caucasus or so it is usually believed. Iranians in Iran have proto-Iranic admixture which was European, but are more West Asian/Middle Eastern by blood.
    osssetians have also on the maternal side not much iranic ancestry. There is a misconception that ossetians have iranic admixture on their maternal side because they have similar mtdna like persians but actually persians have mtdna which is almost entirely pre-indoeuropean. Iranic migrations were dominated by males who took local non-iranic wifes.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Aryan R1a = Turkic ?
    By Proto-Shaman in forum Y-DNA
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 10-24-2018, 10:27 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-05-2013, 02:22 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •