Eurogenes Biogeographic Ancestry Project

[Pallantides]

Thank you

Simple plot of Northeast European component:

FI 78.11
Komi 68.39
N. Russian 61.59
RU 49.45
LT 48.85
BY 44.73
PL 33.98
SE 22.62
HU 22.50
RO 19.31
NO 16.22
adygei 15.27
DE 14.59
TR 12.36
IR 9.14
Lezgin 8.68
AJ 6.96
UK 4.58
FR 4.02
GR 3.68
SY 3.58
PT 2.82
JO 1.51 <-possibly (<2% = noise)
KSA 1.33
EG 1.31
PSTN 1.20
IE 1.16
AM 1.00
ASY 0.99
Orcadian 0.90
Tuscan 0.85
ES 0.80
N.Italy 0.76
Mozabite 0.54
AZJ 0.53
SJ 0.39
CY 0.33
GEJ 0.30
IRJ 0.26
IQJ 0.06

EDIT:
I excluded the Armenian outliers from the Armenian group.

West-North Central European

Orcadian 74.58
IE 70.11
NO 64.86
UK 64.18
SE 58.21
DE 54.82
FR 47.74
LT 41.48
PL 40.70
HU 40.62
BY 35.43
ES 33.69
PT 31.32
N.Italy 31.22
Tuscan 26.23
Tuscan 26.23
N.Russian 23.64
GR 16.17
FI 13.22
adygei 11.79
AJ 8.78
SJ 8.54
IR 5.00
TR 4.72
AM 3.59
CY 2.76
SY 2.67
AZJ 1.27
LB 1.09
ASY 1.08
Mozabite 0.86
Bedouin 0.80
Sardinian 0.26
EG 0.05
IQJ 0.04

Armenian and Ashkenazi outliers excluded.

[Pallantides]

error error

[Pallantides]

^evon made a mistake with the graphs, SE1 is not 4.1% in the Mideastern cluster and according to Davide he did a lot of other calculating mistakes... but I'm to lazy to look at the spreadsheet right now, so I just remove the graphs.

[Pallantides]

West and Central Eurasia 3D view

[Osweo]

To my eye, these charts seem to show something of a ring. The main connection between populations is the Europe - Middle East - South Asia - Far East one, with a more tenuous one linking the extremes of the circumpolar peoples.

Do we think that if we had complete samples for all ethnic groups, we'd 'fill in the gaps'? I played around on paint with one graph, trying to work out from geography and ethnohistory WHO would be in the gaps;

The big red circle with a Ч in it is the Turkic speaking Chuvash on the middle Volga. Seems to me that we ought to stick the following in to tie them in better with the wider scheme; more Komi, Ob Ugrians (Mansi and Khanty), Nenets Samoyeds (to link the arctic continuum).
Gagauz, Crimean Tatars, Mordva, Kazan Tatars, Siberian Tatars (to link the central Europeans with the Turkics).
Nogai, Turkmen and Tajiks to get the southern Eurasian link.
And a big fat load of Tibetans to plug the gap in the south east.

Do we expect that there'll still be gaps?

Fascinating to see single ethnoses break down into cluster to demonstrate the plural origins that history often suspected...

I'm wondering, though; why do the peoples roughly in the middle - Uygurs and Hazara - look so 'stretched'? Is this just a result of how the graph was made, or does it really reflect a greater diversity within their populations?

[Pallantides]

Here is an Excel file including all members. Outputted fields

1 Project member
2 Nationality for segment
3 Segment count, included all segments below 300 SNPs. Segment count corresponds average number of segments between the project member and all related individuals in each nationality.

I have done a minor fix after previous graphics.

http://www.4shared.com/document/3ioc...nts_count.html

My result(NO2)

SE 6,71
NO 5,67
UK 5
HU 4,95
US 4,74
FR 4,39
North_Russia 4,36
PL 4,33
BY 4,11
ES 3,5
RU 3,43
PT 3,25
RO 3,07
DE 3
FI 3
IE 3
LT 2,9
Chuvash 2,82
GR 2,6
IT 2,56
Adygei 2,53
AJ 2,43
Selkup 1,89
Pathan 1,59
ASY 1,56
IR 1,53
TR 1,5
UZ 1,4
Uygur 1,2
Burusho 1,04
IN 1
Hazara 0,86
Altai 0,83
Yakagir 0,75
Nganassan 0,69
AA 0,69
ET 0,63
East Greenland 0,5
Tuva 0,5
Athabaks 0,47
Yakut 0,43
Buryat 0,42
Evenk 0,4
Orogen 0,33
West Greenland 0,33
Mongol 0,28
Daur 0,22
Dolgan 0,2
TU 0,2
Yoruba 0,19
CO 0,14
Pima 0,14
Xibo 0,14
Maya 0,11
She 0,1
Tujia 0,1
Han 0,09
Koryak 0,07
Bantu 0,06
JP 0,03

[poiuytrewq0987]

error error

[YOUTUBE]4aMD4uy-QGc[/YOUTUBE]

[Pallantides]

Something interesting...

NO1 - FI 6
NO2 - FI 3
NO3 - FI 5,75
NO5 - FI 5


I'm from East Norway and supposedly have some Forest Finn ancestry from the 17th century, while NO1 is a West Norwegian.

[Electronic God-Man]

Can someone help me out with the new admixture analysis?

I'm going to guess none of that is enough to indicate admixture?

[Franz]

Soten, that's the overall picture. Here are your details:

rs1029145	AFR
rs10492520	EAS
rs10514241	EAS
rs10779907	EAS
rs10825468	AFR
rs1105391	EAS
rs11060233	EAS
rs12089636	AFR
rs12217685	EAS
rs12220022	EAS
rs13232076	EAS
rs1334572	AFR
rs1364017	EAS
rs1463427	EAS
rs16839883	EAS
rs16883494	EAS
rs16903010	EAS
rs16903648	AFR
rs16920051	EAS
rs16934416	EAS
rs16957551	AFR
rs16957597	AFR
rs16957664	AFR
rs16988825	AFR
rs17011662	EAS
rs17013664	EAS
rs17013810	EAS
rs17014788	EAS
rs17015638	AFR
rs17044715	EAS
rs17067539	EAS
rs17078801	EAS
rs17087075	AFR
rs17087095	AFR
rs17251648	EAS
rs17599262	EAS
rs17748939	EAS
rs1858022	AFR
rs1892868	AFR
rs2069683	EAS
rs2073358	EAS
rs213135	EAS
rs2638298	AFR
rs264701	AFR
rs307274	EAS
rs3756514	EAS
rs3777456	EAS
rs3780660	EAS
rs3811842	EAS
rs3845461	EAS
rs3862609	EAS
rs401522	EAS
rs4939591	EAS
rs4987774	EAS
rs6499781	EAS
rs6812580	AFR
rs6928877	EAS
rs7190322	EAS
rs7201539	AFR
rs7271632	AFR
rs7275620	EAS
rs7290364	EAS
rs763880	EAS
rs7784129	EAS
rs877180	EAS
rs879017	EAS
rs9453955	AFR
rs951954	AFR
rs9556725	EAS
rs9812589	AFR
rs9912490	EAS