3


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,833/1,047 Given: 1,720/1,162 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,154/1,071 Given: 10,212/98 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,833/1,047 Given: 1,720/1,162 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,714/1,597 Given: 1,298/111 |
This doesnt matter as Oghuzes were the main descents of Scythians, mixed with Huns. Two prestigious people mixed into one and creation of Oghuz Turks who also became prestigious as you consider Seljuks, Ottomans ending with Turkey. Scythians, Massagets could be Indo European but not Iranians I think. Also I don't have Iranic ancestry as I don't have any Kurdish, Zaza, Persian, Armenian ancestry. I am not even Anatolian so this couldn't happen in the last thousand year either way


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,833/1,047 Given: 1,720/1,162 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,154/1,071 Given: 10,212/98 |
It is widely known that both the Scythians and Massagataes were Iranian. The Iranic speaking ethnicities are all Indo-Iranians, likewise with the Scythians and Massagatae, they later split up into two language groups, West and East. All Iranic speaking groups have some connection to eachother, doesn't neccesarily mean they have to speak the same language, look the same or have 100% the same genetics. The Turks are a hybrid race of Iranian (most likely Scythian) and Mongol ancestry. This doesn't mean you can claim to be the rightful descendants of the Scythians. Your language, culture, appearance and even genetics prove this.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,833/1,047 Given: 1,720/1,162 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,154/1,071 Given: 10,212/98 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,154/1,071 Given: 10,212/98 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,833/1,047 Given: 1,720/1,162 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks