0

| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 27/4 Given: 0/0 |
2nd Wave: 1.4%
Siberian: 1.21%
Basque: 38.5%
Chuvash: 58.89%
Amerindian: 0%
___________________-


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 0/0 Given: 0/0 |
Data sent !
Very interesting project.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,538/309 Given: 1,428/181 |
He didn't elaborate any further. Wonder what will be different.I will include your results in today's or tomorrow's run. It will be a different analysis from previous ones though.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,538/309 Given: 1,428/181 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 46,299/1,221 Given: 47,332/2,168 |
Restricted Pole Run: Part IV- experiments, conjectures
My results:
Siberian1 - 0.00%
WMPC - 40.73%
NMPC - 46.58%
WMPC+NC - 6.25%
EMPC - 1.94%
WMPC+NWAf - 1.85%
Siberian1 - 1.51%
Siberian3 - 1.15%
Help support Apricity by making a donation

| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2/0 Given: 0/0 |
Populations highest with the components
WMPC: Basque/Sardinian
NMPC: peaks in Chuvash and high in Lithuanian and Belorussian
EMPC: Georgian, Urkarah, Lezgin, Kurd, Adygei, Brahmin, etc. (no order)
WMPC+NC: Palestinian, Druze
WMPC+NWAf: Tunisian
Siberian1: Nganassan
Siberian2: Yakut followed by Buryat
Siberian3: Mongolian, Koryak, Chukchi


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 438/31 Given: 0/0 |
Norway2
Siberian1 - 0.61%
WMPC - 31.24%
NMPC - 66.80%
WMPC+NWAf - 0.81%
Siberian3 0.54%




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,828/89 Given: 1,086/83 |
He blogged about me, how nice of him
http://dioegenesartemis.blogspot.com...-run-part.htmlPonticCaspian, a participant represented in the main graph above, with Moldavian Gagauz and some Ossetian ancestry presents much the same pattern except with higher WMPC (possibly due to proximity to Balkan/West Caucasus populations). Much of the same pattern can be observed in Altaians and Buryats, in a much smaller FC element.
I really don't see population changes after the initial invention/introduction of advanced pastoralism producing such an homogeneous pattern (bear in mind some of these are small components, indeed all of these in the Mongolian case are small, since they're mostly an Eastern population and can be overinflated by the exclusion of major "Siberian" ancestry). Certainly not from Mongolia to the far west. These patterns I think most likely roughly correspond to the original Kurgan pastoralist people, and possibly also to the ancient Tocharian peoples.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 15/6 Given: 0/0 |
Russia2
WMPC-29.56%
NMPC-70.43%


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 438/31 Given: 0/0 |
Norway1
WMPC -38.13%
NMPC - 57.71%
WMPC+NC - 1.87%
EMPC - 0.07%
Siberian3 - 2.21%
Norway2
Siberian2 - 0.61% *
WMPC - 31.24%
NMPC - 66.80%
WMPC+NWAf - 0.81%
Siberian3 0.54%
Norway3
WMPC - 37.93%
NMPC - 59.11%
WMPC+NC - 1.64%
Siberian1 - 1.31%
Sweden1
WMPC - 34.22%
NMPC - 55.99%
WMPC+NC - 2.03%
EMPC - 3.41%
WMPC+NWAf - 1.76%
Siberian1 - 2.08%
Siberian3 - 0.50%
Sweden2
WMPC - 32.80%
NMPC - 67.09%
WMPC+NC - 0.05%
Siberian3 - 0.05%
SwedenNorway1
WMPC - 32.87%
NMPC - 58.69%
EMPC - 8.26%
Siberian3 - 0.18%
SwedenNorway2
WMPC - 34.50%
NMPC - 60.60%
EMPC - 4.21%
Siberian1 - 0.51%
Siberian 3 - 0.18%
SwedenNorway3
Siberian2 - 2.68%
WMPC - 30.60%
NMPC - 59.16%
EMPC - 7.55%
WNorway1
WMPC - 41.15%
NMPC - 58.84%
* I made an error, I'm 0.61% in Siberian2 and not Siberian1.
Last edited by Pallantides; 05-15-2011 at 03:18 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks