Dodecad Ancestry Project

[Hussar]

(Unsupervised)

I reported just the two principal components.


ME :

EUROP. CAUCASOID : 59,92

ASIAN CAUCASOID : 39,7



(for comparison )

centre-south italian average (the belt from Rome to Sicily) :



EUROP. CAUCASOID = - 33,54

ASIAN CAUCASOID = - 65,58

[Olavsson]

The spreadsheet was a bit confusing this time, but "Supervised" is starting at "B", right?

(Roughly)

97.91% European
2.07% Amerindian
0% Palaeoafrican
0% East Asian
0.01% Papuan

In this run, I am 2% Skraeling - oh the horror!

Where is this "Asian caucasoid" some of you mention? I couldn't find it in the spreadsheet...

[Pallantides]

The spreadsheet was a bit confusing this time, but "Supervised" is starting at "B", right?

(Roughly)

97.91% European
2.07% Amerindian
0% Palaeoafrican
0% East Asian
0% Papuan

In this run, I am 2% Skraeling - oh the horror!

Where is this "Asian caucasoid" some of you mention? I couldn't find it in the spreadsheet...

Norwegians - Unsupervised(with the screen names of ABF and Apricity forumites):

Amerindian

0.89 (Olavsson)
0.39(DOD329)
0.32 (Calamus)
0.11 (Nordmann)
0.02(Pallantides)
0 (Evon)
0(DOD279)

Palaeoafrican - 0 for everyone

Papuan

0.52 (Calamus)
0.36 (Evon)
0.3(DOD279)
0.28(Olavsson)
0.26 (Nordmann)
0(DOD329
0(Pallantides)

European Caucasoid:

96.92(Pallantides)
95.02 (Calamus)
94.12(Olavsson)
92.5(DOD329)
92.1(DOD279)
90.87 (Evon)
90.12 (Nordmann)

Asian Caucasoid:

7.8 (Evon)
7.67 (Nordmann)
6.42(DOD279)
5.71(DOD329)
3.92(Olavsson)
3.29 (Calamus)
1.71(Pallantides)

East Asian:

1.84 (Nordmann)
1.39(DOD329)
1.35(Pallantides)
1.18(DOD279)
0.96 (Evon)
0.85 (Calamus)
0.82(Olavsson)

Evon - Western Norwegian from Bergen with ancestry from Sogn og Fjordane
Calamus - Eastern Norwegian
DOD279 - Western Norwegian with ancestry mainly from Møre og Romsdal
DOD329 - 3/4 Norwegian, 1/4 Swedish with some Forest Finn ancestry
Nordmann - not sure where in Norway he is from.

[Aino]

My parents' results.

Supervised

Father
European 92,71
East_Asian 4,31
Amerindian 2,24
Papuan 0,75
Palaeoafrican 0

Mother
European 90,62
East_Asian 6,62
Amerindian 2,76
Papuan 0
Palaeoafrican 0

Unsupervised

Father
European Caucasoid 92,67
East Asian 5,54
Papuan 0,95
Amerindian 0,84
Palaeoafrican 0
Asian Caucasoid 0

Mother
European Caucasoid 90,81
East Asian 7,79
Amerindian 1,23
Papuan 0,16
Palaeoafrican 0
Asian Caucasoid 0

[Efim45]

My supervised results:
.38% Papuan
1.17% Amerindian
3.48% East Asian
.14% Palaeoafrican
94.83% European
-----------
These results aren't definitive, are they?

[Graham]

Supervised


European 99.4
East_Asian 0
Amerindian 0.60
Papuan 0
Palaeoafrican 0


Unsupervised

European Caucasoid 88.39
East Asian 0
Amerindian 0
Papuan 0.03
Palaeoafrican 0
Asian Caucasoid 11.57

[d3cimat3d]

My supervised results:
.38% Papuan
1.17% Amerindian
3.48% East Asian
.14% Palaeoafrican
94.83% European
-----------
These results aren't definitive, are they?

Well considering that both of us are east-Europeans and we got a decent amount of East Asian and west-Europeans did not, I'd say it's pretty accurate.

[Franz]

Submission opportunity open: http://dodecad.blogspot.com/2011/05/...unity-for.html

23andMe or FamilyTreeDNA's "Family Finder" data

[Olavsson]

Wow, check out DOD655 from the latest results: 96.8% Northern European! It's not many people with such a high "Northern European" element in the spreadsheet. I wonder which country he/she might be from?




Btw, I haven't posted my personal results for the standard Dodecad-analysis yet, so here we go:

(DOD620)

68.9% 'Northern European'
19.6% 'Southern European'
10% 'West Asian'
1.5% 'Northeast Asian'

What exactly is the "West Asian"? I've seen that most Europeans get this as well, so it shouldn't be anything "suspicious" I guess.

[Ibericus]

Btw, I haven't posted my personal results for the standard Dodecad-analysis yet, so here we go:

(DOD620)

68.9% 'Northern European'
19.6% 'Southern European'
10% 'West Asian'
1.5% 'Northeast Asian'

What exactly is the "West Asian"? I've seen that most Europeans get this as well, so it shouldn't be anything "suspicious" I guess.

The west-asian component peaks in Georgians and other caucasians, and it's presence in Europe probably has to do with neolithic migrations.