1


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,083/175 Given: 1,712/89 |
NW Euros being more steppe than NE Euros. I can get on board with that.
Listen, NW Euros cannot have more steppe than NE Euros if NE Euros have more ANE on everything else. MDLP K16 also has NE Euros with unusually high Caucasian, which too is wrong, but also contradicts NW Euros being more steppe. Fyi, your southern England and France have more steppe than every single Balto-Slavic ethnicity on this calc.
NW Euros are not more steppe admixed or closer to Indo-Europeans than NE Euros are, you and me both know this. I used to claim this and you even rightfully debunked me with pointing out the flaws of using K15 on ancient samples.
Look Litvin, I like you, but Jesus..
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.divided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpineoldschool anthropology




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,146/718 Given: 20,224/1,181 |
Maybe. But NE Euros are largely descended from WHG survivors such as Kunda-Narva. On the other hand, there were no any WHG survivors in NW Europe. Steppe people just rammed into Neolithic populations in those regions (see GEDmatch results of Neolithic Swedes - they were ENF as fuck, more than Sicilians).
My DNA Origin analysis for 16 EUR (you get 2 reports examining ancestry from 2114 regions, 190 countries): https://www.exploreyourdna.com/DNAOrigin.aspx
This analysis is not based on G25 but on ADMIXTURE. And it has more regions than any other DNA test!


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,083/175 Given: 1,712/89 |
Yet NW Euros have more WHG(save for Balts) once you break up neolithic farmers into WHG/Basal Eurasian or Bedouin.Even if you don't break up neolithic farmer, Scandos but not British Isles people still have more than NE Slavs on every calculator, Eurasia K6, any Davidski calculator, puntdnal ancient, Eurasia CHG, etc.
I guess we have more WHG than you guys AND steppe now too. Again, this is music to my ears, keep it coming.
When are you going to tell your new discovery that NW Europeans are closer to steppe Indo-Europeans to Davidski(after just 1 month ago or so you were trying to argue Bell Beakers were closer to Slavs -_-)?
Litvin, you're all over the place. A few months ago the roles were reversed(me arguing NW Euros were closest to Indo-Europeans before I was proven wrong, now you're doing it).
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9o...VFYWp0WlE/view
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.divided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpineoldschool anthropology




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 23,146/718 Given: 20,224/1,181 |
In fact I just said that Scandinavians have more Steppe, not all of NW Euros.
I don't even count Scandinavians as NW Euros proper. I counted them as N Euros.
English people are NW Europeans, and they are much less Steppe than Scandos.
My DNA Origin analysis for 16 EUR (you get 2 reports examining ancestry from 2114 regions, 190 countries): https://www.exploreyourdna.com/DNAOrigin.aspx
This analysis is not based on G25 but on ADMIXTURE. And it has more regions than any other DNA test!


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,083/175 Given: 1,712/89 |
Okay, I see now you only quoted "Steppe peaking in Orcadians, Icelandic, Norwegians", but you also thumbed down my post, which implies that everything or mostly everything I said was wrong.
Again, Spaniards had as much steppe as NE Euros according to this calc. It's a useless calc, which was my main point. I still disagree that Scandos have more steppe than NE Euros.
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.divided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpineoldschool anthropology


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,083/175 Given: 1,712/89 |
I suppose NE Euros could have more ANE that came independently from IEs/Corded Ware, like from the Latva_MN2 EHG, but the Haak graph on Yamnaya admixture is dodgy.
Czechs more steppe than Belarusians, Orcadian lower than English/Scottish, etc.
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.divided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpineoldschool anthropology




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 11,260/52 Given: 6,741/3 |
It's wrong to add Steppe + Caucasian here. Steppe is just Steppe, there might be a part of "Caucasian" that comes from the steppe and other more minor things, but clearly not most of it. Easy to see with just a few results, Iranians or Levantines for examples are not like 2 times more steppe than Europeans because they score high "Caucasian", it's mostly basal.
For example two Yamnaya:
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 Steppe 61.85
2 NorthEastEuropean 17.86
3 Indian 8.83
4 Caucasian 8.62
5 Amerindian 1.57
6 Neolithic 0.97
7 Subsaharian 0.3
Admix Results (sorted):
# Population Percent
1 Steppe 65
2 NorthEastEuropean 15.73
3 Indian 8.65
4 Caucasian 8.07
5 NearEast 0.88
6 Amerindian 0.84
7 Neolithic 0.62
8 Subsaharian 0.21
Very low Caucasian. And yes that's where the Indian comes from too in Europe. As for any calculator, certain labels can be deceptive.
You ran the calculator in "Oracle4" mode, and the first time in "Oracle" mode. Anecdotic differences in most cases, it just dodges the components under 1% when running the algo.
Last edited by Petalpusher; 02-25-2017 at 01:24 PM.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 7,817/25 Given: 11,069/52 |
Does anyone have results of Rise 595 Montenegro?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks