Is my negrito DNA noise?

[Loki]

I see a lot of Europeans get Indian, south asian etc. Calculators made by armchair scientists.

Which Europeans? Mostly colonials, which is real.

[CrazyDaisy]

Honestly, 1.5% is a lot actually. It can't be "noise".

I agree it's a lot to be noise. But it ultimately doesn't affect my phenotype. It would be interesting to see if it uncovers any Philippino or Roma ancestry.

[Peterski]

Honestly, 1.5% is a lot actually. It can't be "noise".

At least not if you get it consistently in 23andMe, DNA Land, GEDmatch and Ancestry DNA.

[Peterski]

I would be interested in getting gedmatch kits for indomestizos or Indios. Especially from Ecuador or Peru.

Some GEDmatch kits of people who seem to be unmixed Amerindians:

M174237
M192137
M637791
M051413
M283662
M221108 - Mayan

[Lek]

Which Europeans? Mostly colonials, which is real.

Swede:

# Population Percent
1 NorthEastEuropean 30.08
2 Neolithic 28.18
3 Steppe 23.18
4 Caucasian 15.02
5 Indian 3.08
6 Oceanic 0.46

British:

Me:
1 Neolithic 29.12
2 NorthEastEuropean 26.03
3 Steppe 24.4
4 Caucasian 18.11
5 NorthAfrican 1.16
6 Indian 1.09
7 Ancestor 0.08
8 EastAfrican 0.02

British:

Population Percent
1 Neolithic 28.13
2 NorthEastEuropean 27.12
3 Steppe 23.3
4 Caucasian 18.24
5 Amerindian 1.16
6 NorthAfrican 0.93
7 Indian 0.68
8 Australian 0.28
9 NearEast 0.15

Me:

Population Percent
1 Caucasian 34.42
2 Neolithic 31.47
3 NorthEastEuropean 15.86
4 Steppe 15.12
5 NearEast 2.12
6 NorthAfrican 0.39
7 Siberian 0.25
8 Arctic 0.18
9 Oceanic 0.15
10 Australian 0.03
11 SouthEastAsian 0.02

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...results!/page6

Brethrabian and most of these are not colonial. Brethrabian is a ethnic Swede.

I can show you more examples. From French to Irish in other calcs. A lot get some south asian. The ones who dont, usually get more near east or natufian and other components.

[Loki]

I agree it's a lot to be noise. But it ultimately doesn't affect my phenotype. It would be interesting to see if it uncovers any Philippino or Roma ancestry.

No, too small to affect phenotype visibly.

[Loki]

Swede:



British:



British:

Population Percent
1 Neolithic 28.13
2 NorthEastEuropean 27.12
3 Steppe 23.3
4 Caucasian 18.24
5 Amerindian 1.16
6 NorthAfrican 0.93
7 Indian 0.68
8 Australian 0.28
9 NearEast 0.15

Me:

Population Percent
1 Caucasian 34.42
2 Neolithic 31.47
3 NorthEastEuropean 15.86
4 Steppe 15.12
5 NearEast 2.12
6 NorthAfrican 0.39
7 Siberian 0.25
8 Arctic 0.18
9 Oceanic 0.15
10 Australian 0.03
11 SouthEastAsian 0.02

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...results!/page6

Brethrabian and most of these are not colonial. Brethrabian is a ethnic Swede.

I can show you more examples. From French to Irish in other calcs. A lot get some south asian. The ones who dont, usually get more near east or natufian and other components.

I see. But it's probably real then. My point is that such results would be a minority among non-colonials, not the rule.

[Peterski]

(...) I can show you more examples. (...)

The oldest Europeans - such Oase-1 from Romania - also scored Indian-like admixtures:

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...=1#post4221524

That population generally got extinct, but maybe contributed a bit to modern Europeans:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peștera_cu_Oase#Oase_1

the Oase 1 specimen likely did not factor significantly into the gene pool of later humans in Europe since he does not share a greater proportion of alleles with later Europeans than with East Asians.[6]

[CrazyDaisy]

Some GEDmatch kits of people who seem to be unmixed Amerindians:

M174237
M192137
M637791
M051413
M283662
M221108 - Mayan

The first kit you posted scored about 2% Indian, but no Australian. Me and my dad both scored no Indian, but about 1.5% Australian. He scored 1.25%, while I scored 1.88%

[Lek]

The oldest Europeans - such Oase-1 from Romania - also scored Indian-like admixtures:

http://www.theapricity.com/forum/sho...=1#post4221524

That population generally got extinct, but maybe contributed a bit to modern Europeans:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peștera_cu_Oase#Oase_1

Yeah, it is ancient
Not recent.its not to be taken as recent ancestry. Some calcs give me some south asian while others dont. Even you get some ive seen. It makes sense that its ancient.

The.Villager, an armchairchair scientist claims it is recent ancestry from gypsies. He's mad about scoring 7% Egyptian on Dna Land where I get 100% Balkan. Gypsies there score Dravidian. And most likely some even Egyptian.

I didn't choose the results to be so.