Ashkenazi VS Sephardic IQ gap

[Rethel]

Are those villages the sources of great geniuses?

In the past, who knows... it is enaugh for them to be 85 for geniusness, when all around have 70...

East Asians have higher IQs than Europeans. You are #3 on a rather short list. Italians score higher than most Northern Europeans too.

Today.
But still higher IQ happened here, not anywhere elswhere...

Pls explain Chinese superiority.

Rather explain China's and jewish inferiority having higher IQ...
IQ it is not enaugh...

Not blue - not IE.

Did you read too much this scandish freak?

Green are IE as well as blue.
You have hazel - some greenish in it.
You are contaminated

True jewish eyes...

[Danaan]

Maybe Hitler helped. Because those who were smarter (and richer) were more likely to survive the Holocaust.

[TEUTORIGOS]

Pls explain Chinese superiority.

IQ is not the best measure of intelligence possible. Chinese superiority how ? Superiority on a test ? France, Britain, Germany and Italy all have more human accomplishments in the arts and sciences than the Chinese and the population of China (average 'IQ' 106) dwarfs that of these populations. Obviously, the culture is important too and Western culture is superior to Eastern culture that is perhaps an explanation. However, the scientist Michio Kaku in his book "The Future of the Mind" does a pretty good job of eviscerating the concept of IQ as a valid measure of intelligence. Just like genetics went through a Golden age in in the 90s, with the human genome project, neuroscience is now in a golden age with the BRAIN project etc... and in the future we are likely to have better measures of intelligence than the flawed concept of IQ.


You rest too much on your laurels based on your IQ score. Rest instead on real world accomplishments then I might start to listen to you. Your IQ score gives you no authority with me. It might with other fools, though.

[Rethel]

Obviously, the culture is important too

And culture is based on religion which people belive in.
If you belive in fictional gods or demons having wrong
ideas and laws, then you will fail. If you belive in the
best religion, and in the Only True God, having and
observing right ideas and laws, then you will prosper.

And europeans did it (even with couple of
theological errors) - others did not at all.

[TEUTORIGOS]

IQ is a myth study says :

http://www.cell.com/neuron/abstract/...273(12)00584-3

The idea that intelligence can be measured by a single number — your IQ — is wrong, according to a recent study led by researchers at the University of Western Ontario (abstract). The study, published in the journal Neuron on Wednesday, involved 100,000 participants around the world taking 12 cognitive tests, with a smaller sample of the group undergoing simultaneous brain-scan testing. 'When we looked at the data, the bottom line is the whole concept of IQ — or of you having a higher IQ than me — is a myth,' said Dr. Adrian Owen, the study’s senior investigator... 'There is no such thing as a single measure of IQ or a measure of general intelligence'.

Now, this study by itself might not prove anything but when we take into consideration books like Michio Kaku's "Future of the Mind" and other studies like this we start to see IQ is at worst a myth and at best obsolete :

Goodbye, IQ Tests: Brain Imaging Predicts Intelligence Levels :

http://www.jneurosci.org/content/32/26/8988


Research from Washington University in St. Louis has identified variations in brain scans that they believe identify portions of the brain that are responsible for intelligence. As suspected (and as explained by cartoons) brain size does play a small role; they said that brain size accounts for 6.7 percent of variance in intelligence. Recent research has placed the brain's prefrontal cortex, a region just behind the forehead, as providing for 5 percent of the variation in intelligence between people. The research from Washington University targets the left prefrontal cortex, and the strength of neural connections that it has to the rest of the brain. They think these differences account for 10 percent of differences in intelligence among people. The study is the first to connect those differences to intelligence in people.

[TEUTORIGOS]

Q.E.D

RIP (rest in peace) IQ
RIP Longbowman

We shall soon have a wake and funeral for Longbowman and his so called superior "IQ". Neuroscience has made the concept of IQ obsolete.

[Harkonnen]

And culture is based on religion which people belive in.
If you belive in fictional gods or demons having wrong
ideas and laws, then you will fail. If you belive in the
best religion, and in the Only True God, having and
observing right ideas and laws, then you will prosper.

And europeans did it (even with couple of
theological errors) - others did not at all.

Your R1a1-Christian culture is a culture of whores and uneducated alcoholics. I could right now walk 500 metres and go fuck some R1a1-bitch for 50 bucks.

Your god has failed you.

[Rethel]

Your god has failed you.

No! Rather christians faild him

But soon, these apostatic christians
the same as you pagans, will be judge
by the God Allmighty and his Son.

[Harkonnen]

No! Rather christians faild him

R1a1 Christian-patriarchy in action:



SLAVA STRONK

[Petalpusher]

IQ is not the best measure of intelligence possible. Chinese superiority how ? Superiority on a test ? France, Britain, Germany and Italy all have more human accomplishments in the arts and sciences than the Chinese and the population of China (average 'IQ' 106) dwarfs that of these populations. Obviously, the culture is important too and Western culture is superior to Eastern culture that is perhaps an explanation. However, the scientist Michio Kaku in his book "The Future of the Mind" does a pretty good job of eviscerating the concept of IQ as a valid measure of intelligence. Just like genetics went through a Golden age in in the 90s, with the human genome project, neuroscience is now in a golden age with the BRAIN project etc... and in the future we are likely to have better measures of intelligence than the flawed concept of IQ.

I don't think it's the culture. Averages are irelevant for "achievements", the 110/120 while very useful won't revolutionize anything, having a high average makes good functionning societies but it's the top 10/20/30 percentile that matters, although you can argue maybe in a way a high average enables the top percentile to function better in a safer, stable environement. Most of the economy is driven and controlled by top percentiles, while the 1/2% brings home nobels and generally fundamental advancements. East Asians only have higher averages but peak lower.