Eurogenes Biogeographic Ancestry Project

[poiuytrewq0987]

Alabamaman, could you run my results and post the chart? Thanks in advance.

[Grumpy Cat]

How did you do that chart? Can you make one for me? CA21?

[Rochefaton]

Alabamaman, could you run my results and post the chart? Thanks in advance.

Ask and you shall receive.





If I would have known "RS" stood for Serbia, I would have added another group to my calculator when designing it, but alas, I did not.

[Rochefaton]

How did you do that chart? Can you make one for me? CA21?

I put together a spreadsheet that works as a RMSD calculator for the EU7b and NEU6g runs. Give me about 15 minutes and I'll post your charts.

[Rochefaton]

Here are your charts, Acadian:





The NEU6g run looks to be more accurate for you.

[Loki]

The NEU6g run looks to be more accurate for you.

That run does not look more accurate for me, especially this:

North + Central European 38.7%
South + West European 40.75%

Totally out of whack with my ancestry, the latter run describes it much better.

[Barreldriver]

I'm curious for any of the Aprician UK citizens here which run NEU6g or NEU7b was more accurate?

It had already been stated by Alabama that the NEU6g run seems to be more accurate for Scandinavians and those of Scandinavian descent as is seen with Pallantides and perhaps AcadianDriftwood maybe as she's half Faroer if I'm not mistaken.

I can only go off my results as someone with majority ancestry being from the UK that the NEU7b run was more accurate, but I'm not sure if that goes others with ancestry predominantly from or exclusively from the UK.

[Graham]

Ran the NEU6g, changed a bit. The Irish is closer, norwegian further now. With Dutch in third place.

[Rochefaton]

That run does not look more accurate for me, especially this:

North + Central European 38.7%
South + West European 40.75%

Totally out of whack with my ancestry, the latter run describes it much better.

I'm almost finished with a calculator for the NEU5e run. I'm running some tests right now. I think making these charts for each run helps to see which runs are accurate and which are not.

Here is your chart for the NEU5e run, Loki:



Your results seem to get distorted when the South/Western Euro cluster is not broken down further.

[poiuytrewq0987]

That run does not look more accurate for me, especially this:

North + Central European 38.7%
South + West European 40.75%

Totally out of whack with my ancestry, the latter run describes it much better.

I agree, on the NEU6 chart I am just as similar to Spain as I am to Hungary which is bit farfetched since both countries are pretty far away from each others and I have no Spanish ancestry.

However on the other chart Eu7b it shows I am similar to Romania and Hungary. I think is correct considering the geographic closeness of both countries to my region.

It's interesting how I am similar to Hungarians and Romanians considering the linguistic differences between three groups (Slavic, Romance and Ugrian). I think it's just more evidence that the Balkan sprachbund goes beyond language.