Was Haplogroup R originally mongoloid?

[Harkonnen]

No I was referencing wikipedia:

The highest percentages of P are found in Eastern Russia

35.4% among Tuvan males;
35% among Nivkh and;
28.3% among Altai-Kizhi.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplog...n_distribution

Omg you were referencing wikipedia. Well you are wrong, there is no P in Siberia. Those Tuvans are likely Q or something.

[Vlatko Vukovic]

There is no P in Siberia. It is only found in South East Asia. If your info is based on some older studies, it is actually just some undefined Q.

N is originally mongoloid. Look today's N people.

Pure asians and Mongoloids. You cant deny it.

Just Finns different from all others.

[Harkonnen]

on EgyptSearch forum there was something that R1b V88 is the oldest of R1b and came from Africa indeed



more here ---> http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ul...c;f=8;t=009271

and eventually:
http://egyptsearchreloaded.proboards...ion-theory-r1b

That pic actually shows a equal split between V88 and P297. Neither is descendent from the other. For some reason folk have very hard time understanding this concept. I notice this same phenom when discussing haplogroup N matters.

[Harkonnen]

N is originally mongoloid. Look today's N people.

Pure asians and Mongoloids. You cant deny it.

Just Finns different from all others.

East Asians don't have any autosomal ancestry from their N ancestors, they have just the y-dna.

[Messier 67]

Aryan tribes = indian tribes

Stop compare aryan to white skin, this is Hitler's bullshit

You can't call R "Indo-European" because Indo-Europeans came from R, you can't call it "Proto-Indo-European", because again, the Proto-Indo-European came from R. R predated even the Proto-Indo-European. What it is... is aryan. That is the only ethnic label I can think of. And genetics have proven about half of Indians, the Indo-Aryans are R. So the R tribe is aryan. And aryan means the exact opposite of whiteness, it is mongoloid ancestry.

[Vlatko Vukovic]

East Asians don't have any autosomal ancestry from their N ancestors, they have just the y-dna.

Not east asians. See your Sami partners today, and Karelians.

They are massivly Mongoloids.

They are a proof of N mongoloid roots. You look more European becouse of I from Vikings. All Europe know that N is asian marker. Just you are trying to proove a different.

[Harkonnen]

Not east asians. See your Sami partners today, and Karelians.

They are massivly Mongoloids.

They are a proof of N mongoloid roots. You look more European becouse of I from Vikings. All Europe know that N is asian marker. Just you are trying to proove a different.

Dude I'm a Karelian and I look spot on like the Oase man, my ancient ancestor



When I was traveling Europe I was twice the size of the natives and felt like those giant goblins from game of thrones.

[Vlatko Vukovic]

Dude I'm a Karelian and I look spot on like the Oase man, my ancient ancestor



When I was traveling Europe I was twice the size of the natives and felt like those giant goblins from game of thrones.

Actually, that is characteristic for I1 people. That mean you have autosomal contact with I1 proto-Nordics.

Also some Russians was of I1 descent.

Like Lav Nikolayevich Tolstoy.

[Kelmendasi]

Dude I'm a Karelian and I look spot on like the Oase man, my ancient ancestor

[vieo=youtube;5wIXCiYCiiw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5wIXCiYCiiw[/video]

When I was traveling Europe I was twice the size of the natives and felt like those giant goblins from game of thrones.

Oase actually looked like this:

[Kazimiera]

Dude I'm a Karelian and I look spot on like the Oase man, my ancient ancestor

You should invest in some skin.................