Was Haplogroup R originally mongoloid?

[Dibran]

You do know that Saamis are something like 40-50% y-dna I, which is much higher I than most Finnish groups. So according to your theory Saamis are more European looking than Finns.

You'll have to excuse the Slavs. They think they have the answer to everything. 😂

[Proto-Shaman]

ATTENTION PLEASE: FINGOLIA ALARM

[Proto-Shaman]

I hope R1a and other Slavic y-haplogroups were originally mongoloid.
Mongoloid people are cool, smart and strong.

I invite you for dinner sweetheart

[cosmoo]

Dude I'm a Karelian and I look spot on like the Oase man, my ancient ancestor

When I was traveling Europe I was twice the size of the natives and felt like those giant goblins from game of thrones.

Oase was just K and lived cca. 37800 ybp, while NO was formed cca. 41500 ybp, so no, nothing descends from him. Also, you cleverly omitted Ust-Ishim man, which was K2a, much older than Oase 1 (45000 ybp), and he lived in Siberia.
So no- N is not native to Europe by any means, as all ancient DNA suggests (no Finnic N1c whatsoever in Mesolithic northern Europe, plus, its ancestral clades today live in Siberia).

Nah this reco is crap. But in anycase even this one looks more Finnish than Chinese, looks like Jarkko Ruutu. Google the guy. And he was a huge bitch for sure.

They have no resemblance whatsoever, niggerish nose means nothing compared to overall morphology.

[Kelmendasi]

Oase was just K and lived cca. 37800 ybp, while NO was formed cca. 41500 ybp, so no, nothing descends from him. Also, you cleverly omitted Ust-Ishim man, which was K2a, much older than Oase 1 (45000 ybp), and he lived in Siberia.
So no- N is not native to Europe by any means, as all ancient DNA suggests (no Finnic N1c whatsoever in Mesolithic northern Europe, plus, its ancestral clades today live in Siberia).


They have no resemblance whatsoever, niggerish nose means nothing compared to overall morphology.

According to this http://www.ancestraljourneys.org/palaeolithicdna.shtml, the Oase male was K2a. Still though I do agree with the eastern origin of N1c

[Vlatko Vukovic]

You do know that Saamis are something like 40-50% y-dna I, which is much higher I than most Finnish groups. So according to your theory Saamis are more European looking than Finns.

No. Finns are more European then Samiis.

Becouse Finnish DNA is influenced different from Samii.

Look it:

https://www.eupedia.com/europe/europ...logroups.shtml

you have 61% N (who originate in Asia, deal with it), but western Finland is more influenced with I (Or R1a or R1b who already mutated into a European group), so this N is not very visible.

I am sorry if you are N by haplogroup, but this haplogroup is not a factor of your European looking. That is I. That is your grandfather !

[Vlatko Vukovic]

I hope R1a and other Slavic y-haplogroups were originally mongoloid.
Mongoloid people are cool, smart and strong.

You don't think it really

Anyways i hope that i am I2 Balkanite then R ancient Mongoloid.

[Peterski]

Slavic y-haplogroups

Here is the list of Slavic Y-haplogroups (various branches of R1a and I2a):

http://www.historycy.org/index.php?s...post&p=1685377

Michał estimates, that in year 1 AD Proto-Slavs numbered just 6000 men!:

http://www.historycy.org/index.php?s...post&p=1683001

Can you imagine? From 6000 to hundreds of millions during just 2000 years!

[Ülev]

one of this two was Slavicised, but if Russians and Poles want be "Slavic as fuck" then I2a1 can be Celtic (like Bosnensis claim) or Persian (another one theory from all those "porjeklo Hrvata, Srbina etc.)

[Vlatko Vukovic]

one of this two was Slavicised, but if Russians and Poles want be "Slavic as fuck" then I2a1 can be Celtic (like Bosnensis claim) or Persian (another one theory from all those "porjeklo Hrvata, Srbina etc.)

Srba*