Pazyryk Scythian aDNA results (mtDNA)

[Sora]

Hint-Avrupacılar, her boku kendilerine bağlayanlar K U D U R U N!

[Austrvegr]

%40-50 East Eurasian.

So much more East Eurasian than Anatolia's Turkified Kurdo-Armenians.

[Leto]

%40-50 East Eurasian.

Scythians wuz Indo-Yuropeen n shieet.

The Pazyryk were obviously mixed. Western Scythians were much less East Eurasian.

Population
Ancestral_North_Eurasian 32.02
Ancestral_South_Eurasian 0.13
East_Asian 12.73
West_European_Hunter_Gartherer 29.80
Natufian 25.33
Sub_Saharan -

[Leto]

So much more East Eurasian than Anatolia's Turkified Kurdo-Armenians.

Bro, no Turkic nation is 100% mongoloid, maybe only some Yakuts are. I bet Cumans, Khazars and Huns were not even 50% East Eurasian. I used to think like yourself until I saw some actual Turkish samples. They are clearly a mix of Anatolian peoples and Turkmen-like and/or Nogai-like tribes.

[Peterski]

%40-50 East Eurasian.

Scythians wuz Indo-Yuropeen n shieet.

Mexicans speak Spanish, an Indo-European language? Yes they do. But they are only 40-50% Spanish.

[Pennywise]

So much more East Eurasian than Anatolia's Turkified Kurdo-Armenians.

Exactly you gopnik Slav subhuman. Because they are not like any modern populations genetically. The fact that Scythians had nothing to do with your swamp nigger ancestors is inflicting so much pain in your ass that you screech like a whore.

Besides, check out the Y-Search site and look at the matches of Pazyryk sample. Probably half of them are Anatolian Turks. Even 2 Turkish members on this forum are matching with the Pazyryk sample. The results are becoming too thick even for your ruined Slavic ass hole, I must say.

[Leto]

Karakalpak GEDmatch kit numbers. They are only 50-55% mongoloid.
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...ght=karakalpak

Admix Results (sorted):

# Population Percent
1 East_Asian 27.53
2 Siberian 25.2
3 North_European 16.83
4 Caucasus 11.08
5 Gedrosia 8.33
6 Atlantic_Med 5.32
7 Southeast_Asian 3.25
8 South_Asian 2.09
9 Southwest_Asian 0.35

~55% Mongoloid.

[Sora]

So much more East Eurasian than Anatolia's Turkified Kurdo-Armenians.

Bro, you didn't wise up? Or you still insist? Didn't you see my post to you on this thread?
https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post4901702

I'm leaving this here, If you still didn't wise up


Also this

[Pennywise]

The Pazyryk were obviously mixed. Western Scythians were much less East Eurasian.

Population
Ancestral_North_Eurasian 32.02
Ancestral_South_Eurasian 0.13
East_Asian 12.73
West_European_Hunter_Gartherer 29.80
Natufian 25.33
Sub_Saharan -

I'm aware of that, the thing I am againt is that people use "Scythian" word as an umbrella term to lumb all the semi-nomadic steppe people from Eastern Europe to Siberia together and identify them as "Indo-European" by ignoring all the differences.

[Böri]

Who made this?
And that's based on what data?
Since when Armenians are 100% European?
They are closest to Assyrians, even more than they are to the West Asiatic Georgians.

Armenians are less than 10% European/North Euro genetically.
Turks are more than them for example.