1
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,658 Given: 44,154 |
You constantly imply that Whites are superior to other races and are endlessly denigrating Blacks, Mestizos, South Asians and even your Arabian brothers. And like I said, in intelligence as in most facets of life, individual variation is rather greater than group variation.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 689 Given: 1,396 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,581 Given: 20,431 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,658 Given: 44,154 |
As for eugenics, its origins were through White leftists and progressives who saw it as a way of improving society by shrinking the populations of non-whites and the poor, and it was taken to its most hideous extreme by German National Socialists.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,658 Given: 44,154 |
And randomguy, Jews are if anything rather more prominent in global capitalism than they ever were in global communism.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,581 Given: 20,431 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 26,658 Given: 44,154 |
I accept that there are real group disparities, but the key operative phrase is on average, i.e. it doesn't apply to every individual. And since when were Ashkenazim not White? They actually have a higher percentage of light hair and light eyes than do Iberians, Southern Italians, Albanians and Greeks - all of whom are definitely White.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 929 Given: 144 |
The real Jewish Question may be explained as follows: If there is so much emerging from the Jewish Quarter which is threatening to Western culture
and to the white race which founded that culture, then how can the West allow itself the luxury of retaining the Jews in its midst? This is not, ofcourse, to say that all Jews are bad, or even most of them; it is rather
to say that -- to use an unfortunate but apt analogy -- if a swamp keeps breeding malaria, then no matter how many innocent beings the swamp may contain, are we not justified in draining it? There is, of course, no
denying that Jews have made great contributions to the West, and no denying that their contributions are significantly out of proportion to their numbers, as is their intelligence. But there is also no denying that
Jewish good must be balanced against Jewish evil, and that if Jewish evil is so profound as to be threatening the demise of Western civilization, thenthe amount of Jewish good -- however great it might be -- may not
really matter. But in speaking of Jewish good and Jewish evil, we seem to be engaging in the morally dubious act of judging Jews as collectively responsible for
this good or evil, rather than judging them on their individual behavior. But while it is all very well to aspire to judge people by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin -- or in the case of Jews, by their ethnicity -- it is another thing entirely to be able to
knowthe content of an individual's character. Thus while skin color, ethnic origin, or other group designator is a highly imperfect vehicle for judging character, it nevertheless gives some information, and thus makes possible a probability judgment. Accordingly, if we cannot determine the indvidual's character, we would be as foolish to refuse to make a probability judgment based on ethnicity as we would be to refuse to ignore
the likelihood that a visitor to a casino is going to leave with his wallet lightened, or that playing Russian roulette is likely to get you killed.Thus in spite of a moral preference for judging the individual rather than the collective, the fact remains that, to some degree or another, Jews will be held collectively responsible for the acts of Jewish individuals. The matter does not rest purely on probability considerations, however, but on
the fact of what philosophers call emergent properties, ie, the fact that the group may exhibit properties which are not manifest in individuals.The classic example of emergent properties is salt, which is composed of
sodium and chlorine: While both of these substances are poisonous separately, their combination as sodium chloride is essential to life; hence the life-giving properties of salt are 'emergent'. Likewise, while isolated individual Jews are, by and large, good citizens, their combination as part of the 'Jewish nation' may give that nation an
'emergent' character which is lethal to the West.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,581 Given: 20,431 |
Prior to its denigration almost exclusively by Jewish anti-intellectuals in the post WWII era, Eugenics was practiced in over 30 countries. If Eugenics was an inherently violent philosophy, then why haven't we seen an additional 29 "holocausts" in other countries?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,152 Given: 2,395 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks