0
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 9,297/1,289 Given: 26,310/1,078 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 37,281/1,387 Given: 39,691/2,455 |
Who is rich? He who is happy with what he has - Simeon ben Zoma, Ethics of the Fathers, Talmud, Avot 4:1
I live here. I also live here.
Europeans worldwide * Longbowman's family on 23andme * Classify Longbowman * Ask Longbowman anything
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,138/362 Given: 337/30 |
Yeah when I read that comment of his I LOL'd.
The true blame for the Holocaust lies with Britain. Again I must mention the book "from time immemorial" by Joan Peters. In it she shows(by looking at archives from the period) that the British local government largely ignored or covered Arab immigration to the land while enforcing strict immigration laws for the Jews. If the Brits would just fuck off in time = no Holocaust.
Last edited by Philo; 10-10-2018 at 06:07 PM.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 37,281/1,387 Given: 39,691/2,455 |
the true blame for the Holocaust lies with the Germans and their assistants you screamer.
Also whilst the UK didn't accept mass migration to Palestine of Jews for the obvious reason that that would feed the fires that were already burning in the form of the 1936-39 war, the UK *did* accept refugees in the UK itself. Did better than the US, anyway.
Also implying 9 million Jews (total European Jewish population at the time) would have immediately fucked off to Israel despite the fact the current Jewish population isn't even close to that is a joke on your part.
Who is rich? He who is happy with what he has - Simeon ben Zoma, Ethics of the Fathers, Talmud, Avot 4:1
I live here. I also live here.
Europeans worldwide * Longbowman's family on 23andme * Classify Longbowman * Ask Longbowman anything
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 10,344/1,676 Given: 10,638/1,213 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,138/362 Given: 337/30 |
Obviously, but after that it's Britain.
That's the logic behind it for some British officials, but in fact, having an approach of "if we do that it will anger the Arabs" is what brings more terrorism on the side of the Arabs. In contrast, some British officials like Sir Gilbert McCreth(if that's how u write his name), saw the Arabs that were coming from mandatory Syria for what they were, terrorists, and in turn got a letter threatening his life.Also whilst the UK didn't accept mass migration to Palestine of Jews for the obvious reason that that would feed the fires that were already burning in the form of the 1936-39 war
Thanks alot. I know about the kindertransport but that does'nt matter statistically., the UK *did* accept refugees in the UK itself. Did better than the US, anyway.
They would fuck off immediately after the Nazis conquered them, or at least if the Nutzis would allow it. But even if the Nutzis did'nt allow, Israel would provide more arms and men(which it did in the form of the "Jewish brigades" anyway) than mandtaory Palestine did. In any case, a good number of Jews would have gotten to Israel before the war would have even started.Also implying 9 million Jews (total European Jewish population at the time) would have immediately fucked off to Israel despite the fact the current Jewish population isn't even close to that is a joke on your part.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 37,281/1,387 Given: 39,691/2,455 |
Your typical Israeli Anglophobia is immaterial. The facts remain: Britain could not have foreseen the Holocaust either way and had very legitimate reasons for restricting immigration (and even so, Jewish immigration was literally thousands of times more prevalent than Arab immigration). The Kindertransport is just one of many examples, btw. And realistically Britain is a convenient Western scapegoat to allow Israeli kikes to forget that their best buddy America was virulently antisemitic for much of the 1930s, even specifically restricting Jewish immigration and THEN refusing to fill those limited quotas. Don't worry, those boats they turned away, most of them were accepted by the UK, so only about 25% of the passengers ended up dying in the Holocaust (by getting unlucky and ending up in France or the Low Countries, usually). Imagine that: being more anti-Semitic than France.
I would however take issue with Anthony Eden preventing migration during the war to Palestine - in his defence the migration was from Bulgaria, which didn't end up killing its Jews, but his logic was 'if we let you in, we let everyone in.'
Just a peaceful bit of ethnic cleansing, as you do. Then Hitler was all 'yo dudes what about gassing them seeing as we have nowhere to shift them?' and the Germans were all 'I don't know about this, Adie, doesn't seem very peaceful!' and he was all 'no no you guys don't know what you're talking about. Sad! True story.
Who is rich? He who is happy with what he has - Simeon ben Zoma, Ethics of the Fathers, Talmud, Avot 4:1
I live here. I also live here.
Europeans worldwide * Longbowman's family on 23andme * Classify Longbowman * Ask Longbowman anything
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 10,344/1,676 Given: 10,638/1,213 |
More people were killed under the communist regime historically than ever under the Third Reich. Saying the "6 million" is even accurate. 20 million people at least were killed by Communists. Mostly run by Jews.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,138/362 Given: 337/30 |
On the contrary, I quite adore Britain despite all the millions of people it enslaved and killed. Iron Maiden are British. That alone is huge.
Don't recall me saying otherwise.The facts remain: Britain could not have foreseen the Holocaust either way
Read my previous comment regarding those "reasons"and had very legitimate reasons for restricting immigrationA blatant lie. Read "from time immemorial". Arab immigration was prevelant during all of the mandate's years. The Brits themselves admit this in telegraphs and such.(and even so, Jewish immigration was literally thousands of times more prevalent than Arab immigration).
You being better than USA does not mean much.The Kindertransport is just one of many examples, btw.
I never defended America so don't know why you are bringing this up.And realistically Britain is a convenient Western scapegoat to allow Israeli kikes to forget that their best buddy America was virulently antisemitic for much of the 1930s, even specifically restricting Jewish immigration and THEN refusing to fill those limited quotas.
Still does'nt make up for their policies in Palestine. And I'm not even mentioning the fact they gave Transjordan to the Hashemites.Don't worry, those boats they turned away, most of them were accepted by the UK, so only about 25% of the passengers ended up dying in the Holocaust (by getting unlucky and ending up in France or the Low Countries, usually).
Also, regardless, you can't defend the allies not bombing Auschwitz.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks