0
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,805 Given: 4,573 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,805 Given: 4,573 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,492 Given: 13,022 |
Assad is only short term solution as it was pointed by Georgia which I am impressed, most people do resent him to be honest, the majority. He is only good because he will hold Syria, otherwise their should be true transformation to democracy, but this will not happen any time soon, perhaps he will be more inclusive in his government which would be the right step. In the rural areas he has no supporters, in the southeast neither as most tribal/region dislike him, but they also dislike Turks and Iranians even more to be honest. Kurds don't really like him to, and they only changed their tunes when they saw no one is going to help them like what happened in Iraq. However he is better in, than having a chaos unleashed like what happened in Libya.
My genetic results
1 50% Azeri_Dagestan +50% BedouinA @ 2.879975
One nation and one destiny
Thumbs Up |
Received: 45,100 Given: 45,137 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 13,492 Given: 13,022 |
Not at all. I think Assad is better to be there, then to let chaos ensues. I was naive to think that democracy can work there, as there is to many factions fighting for power. I said that Assad should be more inclusive and represent people from all ethnic groups in government.
My genetic results
1 50% Azeri_Dagestan +50% BedouinA @ 2.879975
One nation and one destiny
Thumbs Up |
Received: 346 Given: 196 |
What happened in Lybia is just a necessary stage on the way of building the future successful state, the more Assad regime holds the power the longer this problem solution is going to be postponed.
It'd be certain death for regime, socialistic type of dictatorship by definition doesn't emply decentralization of power.
DE OPPRESSO LIBER
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,220 Given: 2,355 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks