2
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
This Vlach keeps bitching about Dacian I2-dinaric but never presented any kind of evidence while he was given medieval Slav I2-din sample sand lot of scientific facts like lack of diversity in south slavs. It's getting fucking annyoing already.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 20,928 Given: 18,995 |
Slavic invasion of the Balkans was brutal by our modern standards, but back in the 500s Slavs were actually known for being kinder to their enemies than most of other barbarians of that time.
Maurice, "Strategikon", 11, 4:
"The Sclavenes and the Antes live in the same way and have the same customs. They are both independent, absolutely refusing to be enslaved or ruled by foreigners, least of all in their own land. They are populous and hardy, bearing readily heat, cold, rain, nakedness, and scarcity of provisions. They are kind and hospitable to travellers in their country and conduct them safely from one place to another, wherever they wish. (...) They, unlike other peoples, do not keep those who are in captivity among them in perpetual slavery, but they set a definite period of time for them, after which they give them the choice: either, when they so desire, to return to their own homes if they purchase their freedom, or to stay among them as free people and friends."
^^^
This explains why Slavs were successful in assimilating native Balkan people. Meanwhile, Germanic barbarians failed to assimilate the locals nearly everywhere, except England.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
There is. there are I2-din medieval Polish and Russian samples who are fully Slav. And the fact that in huge Balkan ydna ancient study no I2- din was found, only I2a2
Get over it already.
the most recent research by O.M. Utevska (2017) found the haplogroups STR haplotypes have the highest diversity in Ukraine, with ancestral STR marker result "DYS448=20" comprising "Dnieper-Carpathian" cluster, while younger derived result "DYS448=19" comprising the "Balkan cluster" which is predominant among the South Slavs. The clusters divergence and gradual expansion from the Carpathians in the direction of the Balkan peninsula happened approximately 2,860 ± 730 years ago, coinciding with the Slavic migration. The lack of diversity of "DYS448=19" haplotypes in the Western Balkan also indicate a founder effect.
Last edited by Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić; 02-26-2019 at 12:50 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 3,983 Given: 2,435 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
Procopius:
“(…) In Illyria and Thracia, from the Ionian Gulf to Byzantine surrounding cities, where Hellas and Chersonese regions are situated, (…) the Sclavenes and the Antes, penetrating practically every year since Justinian administering the Roman Empire, were inflicting irreversible damage to their inhabitants. In each invasion I estimate 200,000 Romans were either took as prisoners or killed (…)”
“(…) These people, as we started to say at the beginning of our account or catalogue of nations, though off-shoots from one stock, have now three names, that is, Venedi, Antes and Sclaveni. (…) they now rage in war far and wide, in punishment for our sins (…) Though their names are now dispersed amid various clans and places, yet they are chiefly called Sclaveni and Antes. (…)” ~ Jordanes about the three branches of early Slavic peoples.
John of Ephesus:
“(…) In third year after the death of Emperor Justin, during the reign of victorious Tiberius, the damned nation of the Slavs has risen, and marching through entire Hellas, through lands of Thessaly and Thrace, captured many cities and strongholds, plundered, burned and robbed, seized the land and settled there with full ease, without fear, like in their own land. (…) they were plundering the country, burning it and robbing, as far as the Great Walls [of Constantinople], and this is how they captured many thousands of cattle, as well as many other kinds of booty. (…) Until today, that is until year 584, they still continue to live in peace in lands of the Rhomaioi, without fear and concern, plundering, enslaving and burning, getting rich and highjacking gold and silver, capturing horses and plenty of weapons; and they have learned to fight better than the Rhomaioi. (…)”
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,114 Given: 10,158 |
All of I2a Din (North and South) is slavic and descends from the Polish/Belarus/Ukrainian triangle region. The only I2a in a Balkan context which isn't Slavic is I2a2 and I2a1a, the former is rare and usually found in south Albania and Greece only, the latter is Sardinian. The TMRCA values have long connected I2a-Din to the slavic migrations, and the direct ancestral clade of I2a has been found in Sweden and Norway. Nothing southern genetically about it as a Y dna. If you want to argue against well established science that's your decision, but don't act like your opinion is anything more than a unfounded conspiracy at this point.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 11,114 Given: 10,158 |
People often forget that while by percent I2a-din is highest in the Balkans, by shear numbers I2a Din in North Slavs dwarfs South Slavs. Anywayz copypasta.
"Nowadays, I2a1 is five to ten times more common than G2a in Southeast Europe, while during the Neolithic period G2a was approximately four times more common. What can explain this complete reversal? At one point in history, I2a1 lineages seem to have benefited from being on the winning side. Apart from a minor boost from (hypothetically) joining Yamna's westward expansion to Europe, the principal determining event that allowed I2a1b-L621 to become a major Eastern European lineage was probably the Slavic migrations from the 6th to the 9th century CE. Most modern Eastern Europeans belonging to I2a1b fit into the L147.2 (aka CTS10228, CTS2180 or Y3111) subclade, which is thought to have arisen 5,600 years ago (just before the Yamna period and the Trypillian expansion into the steppe), but has a TMRCA of only 2,300 years according to Yfull. The minority of I2a1b-L621 individuals negative for L147.2 are all found around eastern Poland, Belarus and western Ukraine, suggesting that this is where this lineage survived since the Chalcolithic. The I2a1b-L147.2 subclade seems to have expanded very fast from 1900 years ago, which is concordant with the timing of the Slavic ethnogenesis, considering that it takes a few centuries before one man can have enough male descendants to start having an impact at the scale of a population. This I2-L147.2 ancestor would have such an impact on the burgeoning Early Slavic population, still small 2,300 years ago, but booming.
After the Germanic tribes living in eastern Germany and Poland, like the Goths, the Vandals and the Burgundians, invaded the Roman Empire, the Slavs living further east filled the vacuum. Following the collapse of the Western Roman Empire in 476, the Slavs moved in the Dinaric Alps and the Balkans. By the 9th century, the Slavs occupied all modern Slavic-speaking territories, apart from the eastern Balkans under the control of the Turkic-speaking Bulgars.
Nowadays northern Slavic countries have between 9% (Poland, Czech republic) and 21% (Ukraine) of I2a-L621, while southern Slavs have between 20% (Bulgaria) and 50% (Bosnia). The higher percentage of I2a-Din in the south is probably just due to another founder effect due to the fact that the South Slavs originated in western Ukraine, where the ratio of I2a to R1a was higher. Virtually all Dinaric I2a falls under the L147.2 branch, and the majority to the S17250 ramification, who descend from a common patrilinear ancestor who lived only 1,800 years ago."
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,948 Given: 7,469 |
There was a period where Central-East Europe and Eastern Europe proper were Slavic but the Balkans still spoke Paleo-Balkan languages. Slavs from Central Europe later settled the Balkans with the latest migrants arriving in Thrace.
I don't know why I didn't think of this earlier, but if the Moldova Scythian is heavily Slavic-admixed (even the exotic ones are to a large degree), then I may as well just use another Scythian sample. Also, I used a 15% filter here and it managed to filter out some outliers and improve the fit.
(Reminder that Poles are not pure Slavic)
Fit 0.7754 Balkans IA 26.67 Greek Central Anatolia 20.83 Polish 51.67 Scythian Pazyryk 0.83
When trying "Saltovo-Mayaki" instead of "Scythian Pazyryk" then it becomes 0 and the overall fit is 0.8706.
Saltovo-Mayaki is probably the closest we have to an Old Bulgar sample and the Old Bulgars were probably genetically the same as this. A bit of info about Saltovo-Mayaki:
The Old Bulgars were Onogur Turks by the way.Saltovo-Mayaki or Saltovo-Majaki is the name given by archaeologists to the early medieval culture of the Pontic steppe region roughly between the Don and the Dnieper Rivers, flourishing roughly between the years of 700 and 950.[1]
Their culture was a melting pot of Onogur, Khazar, Pecheneg, Magyar, Alan, and Slavic influences. During the ninth century the Saltovo-Mayaki culture was closely associated with the Khazar Khaganate, and archaeological sites from this period are one way that historians track the geographic scope of Khazar influence.
The Saltovo-Maykaki material culture was "fairly uniform" across the various tribes.[2]
If modern Bulgars get 0 of Saltovo-Mayaki, that means their Old Bulgar genetics are insignificant or non-existent.
Also, I'd like to add that Hungarians get 0 of Saltovo-Mayaki as well.
Last edited by Mingle; 02-26-2019 at 03:51 PM.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 5,396 Given: 6,059 |
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks