My true ancestry.com

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

Proto-Serbs were I2-PH908, R1a and probably some other haplogroups in small %.

Your wishful thinking won't make it reality. They had type of R1a modern Sorbs have and parhaps some DinN, I1. That's about it.

[dosas]

Ahem, my father has done an autosomal test but it cost over $100. Let's see how gedmatch interprets his data. Eg. Eurogenes k13 he gets Romanian first @ 2.83 [emoji23]

Good thing for your dad is that he can relocate to his homeland of Romania so easily, since both countries are in the EU, where he can reunite with his people, instead of lamenting his butthurt over the intrawebz via a representative.

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

Yes, same happened imn Slavonia, Dalmatia and Lika. Northwestern Croatia have full population which is there since middle age, as Torlaks in Serbia.
Zagorians and Međimurci are different from other Croatians in same level as Torlaks than other Serbs maybe even more.

That is because we North Croats have Panonnian Slav and Hallstat Celtic origin. But we have been incorporated with southern (White) Croats and Illyrians since 925, and that's quite long time.

[Bosniensis]

Proto-Serbs were I2-PH908, R1a and probably some other haplogroups in small %.

There is no such thing as Proto-Serbs, Serbs were created around 1000 A.D. when Scythian Slavic ruler Stefan Vojislav removed Roman governor of Singidunum (Belgrade) Theophilos Erotikos.

First Serbian King who assimilated Romans (Vlachs) is called King Mihajlo Vojisavljević who became King 1050 A.D.

All others before him were Princes who ruled as Archons along with Romans as direct Vassals to Roman Governors.

From 1050 - 1900+ there was a process called: Slavicization of the Romans on Balkans.

There was no particular issues since Both Serbs and Vlachs were loyal to Roman Empire after Schism and Roman Religion later known as Orthodox Christianity.

That's why we see Serbs as Vlachs.

Do you know that even Romans called themselves Vlachs on Balkans?

Blachernae (Greek: Βλαχέρναι) was a suburb in the northwestern section of Constantinople, the capital city of the Byzantine Empire. It is the site of a water source and a number of prominent churches were built there, most notably the great Church of St. Mary of Blachernae (Panagia Blacherniotissa).

The Romanian philologist Ilie Gherghel, wrote a study about Blachernae and concluded that it possibly derived from the name of a Vlach (sometimes written as Blach or Blasi), who came to Constantinople from the lower Danube, a region named today Dobruja.[2] Gherghel compared data from old historians like Genesios and from the Greek lexicon Suidas and mentioned the existence of a small colony of Vlachs in the area of today Blachernae. Similar opinions were sustained by Lisseanu[3]. The name Blachernae appeared in a work of Theophanes Confessor in connection with a revolt of Flavius Vitalianus against Anastasius Emperor in 513

So NO.

Serbs are More Vlachs than they are Western Slavic Serbian People how they identify.

[Ayetooey]

Your wishful thinking won't make it reality. They had type of R1a modern Sorbs have and parhaps some DinN, I1. That's about it.

Sorbs obviously have nothing to do with Serbs. Their clade of R1a doesn't even match Serbs and I2a is non existant in them. Sorbs have as much to do with Serbs as Caucasus Albania has to do with Albanians.

There's no consensus on the Serb Ethnonym but the Serboi Sarmatian theory is more likely.

[Hrvoje Vukčić Hrvatinić]

Sorbs obviously have nothing to do with Serbs. Their clade of R1a doesn't even match Serbs and I2a is non existant in them. Sorbs have as much to do with Serbs as Caucasus Albania has to do with Albanians.

There's no consensus on Serb ethnology but the Serboi Sarmatian theory is more likely.

Wrong. R1a M458 exist in Serbs, Tesla had it. It is true however you have not much genetic continuity with them.

It isn't disputed White Serbs came from East Germany where Dervan's Serbia was located, whoever denies that has agenda. And that Sorbs (Lužički Srbi) are their descendants.

So look at proto-Serb genetics among them.

[Carpatz]

Good thing for your dad is that he can relocate to his homeland of Romania so easily, since both countries are in the EU, where he can reunite with his people, instead of lamenting his butthurt over the intrawebz via a representative.

Aren't you an Anatolian? Vlachs are more native to Macedonia than you are.

[Pribislav]

There is no such thing as Proto-Serbs, Serbs were created around 1000 A.D. when Scythian Slavic ruler Stefan Vojislav removed Roman governor of Singidunum (Belgrade) Theophilos Erotikos.

First Serbian King who assimilated Romans (Vlachs) is called King Mihajlo Vojisavljević who became King 1050 A.D.

All others before him were Princes who ruled as Archons along with Romans as direct Vassals to Roman Governors.

From 1050 - 1900+ there was a process called: Slavicization of the Romans on Balkans.

There was no particular issues since Both Serbs and Vlachs were loyal to Roman Empire after Schism and Roman Religion later known as Orthodox Christianity.

That's why we see Serbs as Vlachs.

Do you know that even Romans called themselves Vlachs on Balkans?

Blachernae (Greek: Βλαχέρναι) was a suburb in the northwestern section of Constantinople, the capital city of the Byzantine Empire. It is the site of a water source and a number of prominent churches were built there, most notably the great Church of St. Mary of Blachernae (Panagia Blacherniotissa).

The Romanian philologist Ilie Gherghel, wrote a study about Blachernae and concluded that it possibly derived from the name of a Vlach (sometimes written as Blach or Blasi), who came to Constantinople from the lower Danube, a region named today Dobruja.[2] Gherghel compared data from old historians like Genesios and from the Greek lexicon Suidas and mentioned the existence of a small colony of Vlachs in the area of today Blachernae. Similar opinions were sustained by Lisseanu[3]. The name Blachernae appeared in a work of Theophanes Confessor in connection with a revolt of Flavius Vitalianus against Anastasius Emperor in 513

So NO.

Serbs are More Vlachs than they are Western Slavic Serbian People how they identify.

You are boring with your Vlachic propaganda.

Vlachs are not Romans, they are East Romance speakers. Vlachs were created as mix of many people which were present in Balkans in the last few thousands years including Slavs.

[dosas]

Aren't you an Anatolian, you sandnigger piece of shit? Vlachs are more native to Macedonia than you are.

Sorry, white knights are not graced with responses. Your ad homs are hysterical, though. Carry on, boy.

[Grace O'Malley]

This is my result. It does line up with my usual affinities.













I'v just upgraded to footman but I wouldn't advise it unless you're stupid like me because the only extra appears to be this list.

It is interesting that my no 1 match is the Celtic/Viking from Iceland as my no 1 match on the G25 is also Iceland.

I didn't mean to do a second post but to add onto my original post.