New improved World Medieval G25 unscaled calculator

**Lucas** · 04-18-2019, 08:50 AM

It is better than all paid ancient calculators

Not to mention mytruancestry lol

Bosnian:Bosnian_10

SLAVIC,55.4
ILLYRIAN-THRACIAN,14.2
GRECO-ROMAN,10.2
BALTIC,5.2
TARTESSIAN,4
IBERIAN,2.6
GERMANIC,1.6
ALANIC,1.4
AVARIC,1.4
CELTIBERIAN,1.2
ANATOLIAN,0.8
LEVANTINE,0.8
VIKING-RUS,0.6
BERBER,0.4
CELTIC,0.2

Brahmin_Gujarat:GBR-5

ARIAN,76.6
DRAVIDIAN,19.2
BALTIC,0.8
CELTIC,0.8
ANDAMAN,0.6
GERMANIC,0.6
AFRICAN,0.4
CELTIBERIAN,0.2
GRECO-ROMAN,0.2
IBERIAN,0.2
SLAVIC,0.2
SOUTHEAST-ASIA,0.2

Bulgarian:BulgarianD6

ILLYRIAN-THRACIAN,50.4
SLAVIC,22.4
GRECO-ROMAN,16
ANATOLIAN,5.6
BALTIC,2.6
CELTIBERIAN,0.8
ALANIC,0.6
IBERIAN,0.6
HIMALAYAN,0.4
HUNNIC,0.2
NORTH_URALIC,0.2
VIKING-RUS,0.2

Burmese:bumaBR50

SOUTHEAST-ASIA,50.4
HIMALAYAN,35.6
ANDAMAN,6.2
ARIAN,4.6
TURKIC,1.4
TARTESSIAN,0.8
LEVANTINE,0.4
GRECO-ROMAN,0.2
HUNNIC,0.2
SLAVIC,0.2

Burusho:HGDP00444

ARIAN,88
HUNNIC,7.4
PERSIAN,1.4
TURKIC,1.4
ALANIC,0.4
ANATOLIAN,0.4
SOUTHEAST-ASIA,0.4
BALTIC,0.2
CELTIC,0.2
GERMANIC,0.2

Cambodian:HGDP00712

SOUTHEAST-ASIA,77.6
HIMALAYAN,21.2
JAPANESE,0.6
DRAVIDIAN,0.4
AFRICAN,0.2

Chuvash:544_R02C01

NORTH_URALIC,65.2
HUNNIC,24.6
BALTIC,4.2
ALANIC,2.4
AVARIC,1.8
SLAVIC,1
LEVANTINE,0.6
PACIFIC,0.2

Cossack_Ukrainian:GS000035238

SLAVIC,60
BALTIC,22
VIKING-RUS,4.2
ILLYRIAN-THRACIAN,2.8
ANATOLIAN,1.6
CELTIC,1.6
GRECO-ROMAN,1.6
GERMANIC,1.2
VIKING-FINN,1.2
TURKIC,1
HUNNIC,0.8
AFRICAN,0.6
AVARIC,0.4
CELTIBERIAN,0.2
HIMALAYAN,0.2
IBERIAN,0.2
PERSIAN,0.2
TARTESSIAN,0.2

Cypriot:Cyprus2AJ19

LEVANTINE,47
GRECO-ROMAN,38.2
PERSIAN,9.2
ILLYRIAN-THRACIAN,4.8
ANATOLIAN,0.4
AFRICAN,0.2
SOUTHEAST-ASIA,0.2

Czech:NA15724

VIKING-RUS,39.6
SLAVIC,17.2
BALTIC,11.4
CELTIC,9.8
GERMANIC,9.8
ARIAN,1.8
IBERIAN,1.8
TARTESSIAN,1.8
HUNNIC,1.6
AQUITANIAN,1
ILLYRIAN-THRACIAN,1
GRECO-ROMAN,0.8
CELTIBERIAN,0.6
AVARIC,0.4
BERBER,0.4
LUSITANIAN,0.4
ANATOLIAN,0.2
SOUTHEAST-ASIA,0.2
TURKIC,0.2

Dutch:Netherlands14

GERMANIC,51.6
CELTIC,30.4
VIKING-FINN,6.4
CELTIBERIAN,5.6
IBERIAN,2.2
ILLYRIAN-THRACIAN,1.4
AQUITANIAN,0.6
JAPANESE,0.6
SLAVIC,0.4
ALANIC,0.2
BALTIC,0.2
GRECO-ROMAN,0.2
NORTH_URALIC,0.2

English:England12

CELTIC,82
VIKING-BRIT,11
CELTIBERIAN,3.6
GERMANIC,1
AQUITANIAN,0.8
BERBER,0.8
AFRICAN,0.6
LEVANTINE,0.2

**firemonkey** · 04-18-2019, 09:22 AM

Originally Posted by ph2ter

[1] "distance%=0.9609"

Tim_G

CELTIC,46.8
GERMANIC,42.8
VIKING-BRIT,6.8
AQUITANIAN,2
CELTIBERIAN,1.2
NORTH-AMERICA,0.2
SOUTHEAST-ASIA,0.2

[1] "distance%=0.816"

Tim_G_father

CELTIC,47.8
GERMANIC,40.4
CELTIBERIAN,3.4
AQUITANIAN,2.8
VIKING-BRIT,2.4
VIKING-FINN,2
IBERIAN,0.6
BALTIC,0.4
LEVANTINE,0.2

Thanks , it seems this is a revised version of a test you gave me the results of on Anthrogenica . With the first the amount of Germanic was greater than the Celtic, and the amount of Viking was less. Whether Celtic or Germanic is the primary population for my father and I seems to fluctuate with the various tests.
See https://anthrogenica.com/showthread....nic#post547339 #61
https://anthrogenica.com/showthread....nic#post330109 #683
https://anthrogenica.com/showthread....light=germanic #169
https://anthrogenica.com/showthread....nic#post294785 #270
https://anthrogenica.com/showthread....nic#post294551 #233 with 23andMe data

That is not to disparage any particular test more or less than another , I am not qualified to do so. However much may have to do with the reference populations used.

**Grace O'Malley** · 04-18-2019, 09:50 AM

"sample": "Test1:Sweden_Viking_Age_Sigtuna_-_vik_kls001",
"fit": 2.2263,
"Dutch": 28.33,
"Scottish": 16.67,
"Irish": 15,
"German": 11.67,
"Icelandic": 6.67,
"English": 5.83,
"Swedish": 5.83,
"Belgian": 5,
"English_Cornwall": 1.67,
"Biaka": 0.83,
"Ethiopian_Anuak": 0.83,
"French": 0.83,
"Welsh": 0.83,

"sample": "Test1:Sweden_Viking_Age_Sigtuna_-_vik_grt035",
"fit": 0.4927,
"Irish": 37.5,
"German": 13.33,
"Scottish": 8.33,
"Dutch": 5.83,
"English": 5,
"Belgian": 4.17,
"Orcadian": 4.17,
"Swedish": 4.17,
"Welsh": 3.33,
"French": 2.5,
"Icelandic": 2.5,
"Finnish_East": 1.67,
"Norwegian": 1.67,
"Spanish_Cantabria": 1.67,
"Ethiopian_Anuak": 0.83,
"Finnish": 0.83,
"French_South": 0.83,
"Ingrian": 0.83,
"Portuguese": 0.83,

This is what I get as a fully Irish person.

"sample": "Test1:_unscaled",
"fit": 0.5817,
"Irish": 25.83,
"Dutch": 23.33,
"Scottish": 13.33,
"Icelandic": 12.5,
"German": 5,
"English": 4.17,
"Norwegian": 4.17,
"Orcadian": 4.17,
"Swedish": 2.5,
"English_Cornwall": 1.67,
"French": 0.83,
"Masai": 0.83,
"Tubalar": 0.83,
"Welsh": 0.83,

Could these two possibly be Gall-Ghaeil i.e. Norse-Gaels? Who really knows? These Sigtuna Vikings were obviously quite varied.

One of the Viking-Rus.

"sample": "Test1:Sweden_Viking_Age_Sigtuna_-_vik_urm035",
"fit": 1.3741,
"Dutch": 18.33,
"Karelian": 13.33,
"German": 12.5,
"Finnish_East": 7.5,
"Latvian": 7.5,
"Swedish": 6.67,
"Czech": 4.17,
"Icelandic": 3.33,
"Irish": 3.33,
"Estonian": 2.5,
"Finnish": 2.5,
"Russian_Kostroma": 2.5,
"Scottish": 2.5,
"Chuvash": 1.67,
"Orcadian": 1.67,
"Ukrainian": 1.67,
"Vepsian": 1.67,
"BedouinB": 0.83,
"Cossack_Kuban": 0.83,
"English_Cornwall": 0.83,
"Ethiopian_Oromo": 0.83,
"Ingrian": 0.83,
"Mordovian": 0.83,
"Norwegian": 0.83,
"Polish": 0.83,

One of the Viking-Finns

"sample": "Test1:Sweden_Viking_Age_Sigtuna_-_vik_gtm021",
"fit": 0.6874,
"Swedish": 18.33,
"Icelandic": 15.83,
"Finnish": 12.5,
"Dutch": 10.83,
"Finnish_East": 9.17,
"Karelian": 8.33,
"German": 7.5,
"Estonian": 5.83,
"Scottish": 4.17,
"Irish": 3.33,
"Ingrian": 1.67,
"Norwegian": 0.83,
"Orcadian": 0.83,
"Saami": 0.83,

The above models are most likely not the best because I just used the FreeForm with all the modern populations so it just picked all these overlapping populations. Someone could do a much better model which would be good to see.

**Lucas** · 04-18-2019, 09:52 AM

Originally Posted by Grace O'Malley

"sample": "Test1:Sweden_Viking_Age_Sigtuna_-_vik_kls001",
"fit": 2.2263,
"Dutch": 28.33,
"Scottish": 16.67,
"Irish": 15,
"German": 11.67,
"Icelandic": 6.67,
"English": 5.83,
"Swedish": 5.83,
"Belgian": 5,
"English_Cornwall": 1.67,
"Biaka": 0.83,
"Ethiopian_Anuak": 0.83,
"French": 0.83,
"Welsh": 0.83,

"sample": "Test1:Sweden_Viking_Age_Sigtuna_-_vik_grt035",
"fit": 0.4927,
"Irish": 37.5,
"German": 13.33,
"Scottish": 8.33,
"Dutch": 5.83,
"English": 5,
"Belgian": 4.17,
"Orcadian": 4.17,
"Swedish": 4.17,
"Welsh": 3.33,
"French": 2.5,
"Icelandic": 2.5,
"Finnish_East": 1.67,
"Norwegian": 1.67,
"Spanish_Cantabria": 1.67,
"Ethiopian_Anuak": 0.83,
"Finnish": 0.83,
"French_South": 0.83,
"Ingrian": 0.83,
"Portuguese": 0.83,

This is what I get as a fully Irish person.

"sample": "Test1:_unscaled",
"fit": 0.5817,
"Irish": 25.83,
"Dutch": 23.33,
"Scottish": 13.33,
"Icelandic": 12.5,
"German": 5,
"English": 4.17,
"Norwegian": 4.17,
"Orcadian": 4.17,
"Swedish": 2.5,
"English_Cornwall": 1.67,
"French": 0.83,
"Masai": 0.83,
"Tubalar": 0.83,
"Welsh": 0.83,

Could these two possibly be Gall-Ghaeil i.e. Norse-Gaels? Who really knows? These Sigtuna Vikings were obviously quite varied.

One of the Viking-Rus.

"sample": "Test1:Sweden_Viking_Age_Sigtuna_-_vik_urm035",
"fit": 1.3741,
"Dutch": 18.33,
"Karelian": 13.33,
"German": 12.5,
"Finnish_East": 7.5,
"Latvian": 7.5,
"Swedish": 6.67,
"Czech": 4.17,
"Icelandic": 3.33,
"Irish": 3.33,
"Estonian": 2.5,
"Finnish": 2.5,
"Russian_Kostroma": 2.5,
"Scottish": 2.5,
"Chuvash": 1.67,
"Orcadian": 1.67,
"Ukrainian": 1.67,
"Vepsian": 1.67,
"BedouinB": 0.83,
"Cossack_Kuban": 0.83,
"English_Cornwall": 0.83,
"Ethiopian_Oromo": 0.83,
"Ingrian": 0.83,
"Mordovian": 0.83,
"Norwegian": 0.83,
"Polish": 0.83,

One of the Viking-Finns

"sample": "Test1:Sweden_Viking_Age_Sigtuna_-_vik_gtm021",
"fit": 0.6874,
"Swedish": 18.33,
"Icelandic": 15.83,
"Finnish": 12.5,
"Dutch": 10.83,
"Finnish_East": 9.17,
"Karelian": 8.33,
"German": 7.5,
"Estonian": 5.83,
"Scottish": 4.17,
"Irish": 3.33,
"Ingrian": 1.67,
"Norwegian": 0.83,
"Orcadian": 0.83,
"Saami": 0.83,

Thanks. So ph2ter named them correctly.

**Grace O'Malley** · 04-18-2019, 09:57 AM

Originally Posted by LukaszM

Thanks. So ph2ter named them correctly.

Yes looking at the populations that they get but I would like to see what some get using nMonte with R.

**ph2ter** · 04-18-2019, 10:48 AM

Originally Posted by LukaszM

Soem academic samples

Adyg...

These samples results look very logical to me.

karakartal · 04-18-2019, 10:55 AM

Do you have a any Greek user using this calculator? I want to see their results and compare it.

**ph2ter** · 04-18-2019, 10:57 AM

Originally Posted by LukaszM

It is better than all paid ancient calculators

Not to mention mytruancestry lol

....
Czech:NA15724

VIKING-RUS,39.6
SLAVIC,17.2
BALTIC,11.4
CELTIC,9.8
GERMANIC,9.8
ARIAN,1.8
IBERIAN,1.8
TARTESSIAN,1.8
HUNNIC,1.6
AQUITANIAN,1
ILLYRIAN-THRACIAN,1
GRECO-ROMAN,0.8
CELTIBERIAN,0.6
AVARIC,0.4
BERBER,0.4
LUSITANIAN,0.4
ANATOLIAN,0.2
SOUTHEAST-ASIA,0.2
TURKIC,0.2
...

It is obvoius that German-Slavic mixed persons are overtaken by Viking-Rus component.
Maybe these Viking samples can be removed, but calc with them looks more interesting.

**ph2ter** · 04-18-2019, 11:00 AM

Originally Posted by karakartal

Do you have a any Greek user using this calculator? I want to see their results and compare it.

Average Greek:

[1] "distance%=0.8798"

Greek

ILLYRIAN-THRACIAN,53.8
GRECO-ROMAN,25.4
SLAVIC,8.8
ANATOLIAN,5.2
BALTIC,3.2
LEVANTINE,1
AVARIC,0.6
IBERIAN,0.6
ALANIC,0.4
PERSIAN,0.4
TARTESSIAN,0.4
NORTH_URALIC,0.2

**Grace O'Malley** · 04-18-2019, 11:00 AM

Originally Posted by ph2ter

It is obvoius that German-Slavic mixed persons are overtaken by Viking-Rus component.
Maybe these Viking samples can be removed, but calc with them looks more interesting.

I don't think they should be removed but they are obviously not all the same ethnicity which is interesting in itself.