3
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 10 Given: 0 |
This is a older study I made. The genotype was "haploid" meaning the researcher couldnt at that time get the diploid genotype from the remains meaning if the remains had at one location AG the researchers would only managed to get A or G but not both AG in most cases. I have made a new study based on the latest diploid genotype of La Braña 1. The earlier published ancient Gotlanders and ancient Swedish farmers from Skoglund 2012 suffered from the same problem but new genotypes have been released in Skoglund 2014.
http://fennoscandia.blogspot.cz/2014...ardinians.html
Thumbs Up |
Received: 4,537 Given: 3,021 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,764 Given: 294 |
In an very simplistic way which modern populations would you say generally shares the most genetic similarity with La Braña 1?
I've thought that it's as a whole pretty much Samis, Finns, Estonians and Northern/Central-Swedes/Norwegians in pretty much that order. Is this not correct? Which groups lined up in a similar way would say were more correct?
Thumbs Up |
Received: 21,069 Given: 39,632 |
If you want to be techincal all of the Norse/Balkan/Continental Germanic archaic types like Baltid (less than most), Boreby and Brunn are all Cro-Magnid. Cro-Magnid= Medium-Tall, Robust Mammoth hunters.
![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 21,069 Given: 39,632 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks