My true ancestry.com

[Mortimer]

Your closest Ancient populations...

Roman

RomansScythiansGauls
Scythian + Roman (15.35)
Scythian + Gaul (20.04)
Roman (20.61)
Scythian (23.18)
Gaul (23.2)

Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...
(Smaller numbers mean closer matches to you)

1. Central Roman (590 AD) (20.61) (Click for more info)
2. Visigoth Mixed Slav Girona (550 AD) (21.01) (Click for more info)
3. Medieval Tyrolian (670 AD) (22.52) (Click for more info)
4. Scythian Ukraine (235 BC) (23.18) (Click for more info)
5. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) (23.2) (Click for more info)
6. Central Roman (590 AD) (23.26) (Click for more info)
7. Scythian Moldova (300 BC) (23.61) (Click for more info)
8. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (23.64) (Click for more info)
9. Hellenic Roman (590 AD) (24.15) (Click for more info)
10. Hellenic Seleucid Anatolia (165 BC) (24.19) (Click for more info)
11. Gepid / Goth (450 AD) (24.24) (Click for more info)
12. Central Roman (670 AD) (24.44) (Click for more info)
13. Cimmerian Odessa (900 BC) (24.55) (Click for more info)
14. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 AD) (24.56) (Click for more info)
15. Central Roman (590 AD) (24.59) (Click for more info)
16. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (25.07) (Click for more info)
17. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1600 BC) (25.11) (Click for more info)
18. Thracian Bulgaria (450 BC) (25.11) (Click for more info)
19. Mycenaean (1350 BC) (25.52) (Click for more info)
20. Swiss Germanic (670 AD) (25.61) (Click for more info)

Your closest genetic modern populations...

1. Greek_Thessaly (16.97)
2. Macedonian (17.26)
3. Romanian (17.78)
4. Gypsy (18.01)
5. Bulgarian (18.35)
6. Serbian (19.67)
7. Bosnian (20.16)
8. Kosovan (20.75)

[PaleoEuropean]

@PaleoEuropean
Congrats you're the direct descendant of this 1400BC individual!
These cM results are so way off it's not funny.
One of the Sigtuna "Vikings" 1100AD. That term bugs me and I will get to that later, is my mothers 4th cousin according to her results at almost 50 cM
If she is this individuals "4th Cousin" then why don't I have a match to the same DNA sample with my results?
Very funky stuff.

Getting back to the "Viking" thing this site is using, Viking is not an ethnicity is an occupation, it's what the Norse did.
Norsemen or Norse would be a more appropriate term to use.

I'll be sticking to Gedmatch and the calculators there for the time being, and checking out my"not quite so true"ancestry for a bit of a fun diversion and taking it all in with a grain of salt, there are certainly a number of things that do make sense.
I've found a paper trail of records with a connection to the 1650 Coffin DNA sample on my mothers side through a material line, but that deep dive? hmmmmmm.

Yea only the original settlers of Iceland were actually like Pirate/Outlaw types, I hate that label too when it really doesn't apply to 60-70% of Norse history. I don't put much faith in autosomal dna, just found it weird because my haplgroup is from that area , it is like absurdly high though. They have a lot of work to do, DNA land is also wonky like that.

[firemonkey]

I think , whether it be 'My true ancestry' 23andMe etc or a DIY calculator , that there's a lot of ifs and buts involved when it comes to interpreting the data.

[Gallop]

Zeus

[Gallop]

[firemonkey]

I see you've got a Zeus account. I'm at the Caesar level. $100 for the upgrade is far too much . It gives me the impression the owners see it as being a cash cow.

[Gallop]

I spend twice as much on tobacco.

[Pater Patota]

These are my results without upgrade

IMG_4377.jpg
IMG_4379.jpg
IMG_4381.jpg
IMG_4382.jpg
IMG_4383.jpg
IMG_4384.jpg
IMG_4385.jpg

[Gallop]

Your relatives from Ancient Times (you share identified DNA segments)

[**JC**]

I see you've got a Zeus account. I'm at the Caesar level. $100 for the upgrade is far too much . It gives me the impression the owners see it as being a cash cow.

I'll wait for a sale, at that level $100 is too steep for 40 extra samples.
Also as a test I converted my Ancestry data to 23andme using DND Kit Studio, and uploaded the data to mytrueancestry and got differing cM results in the deep dive section. I picked up over 80cM on a completely different 'Viking' sample.
Not sure if it's the conversion skewing the results, but interesting and somewhat confusing none the less.