0


Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 6,616/39 Given: 5,697/0 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 5,646/170 Given: 40/24 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 52,629/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 381/13 Given: 655/8 |
Don't bother, Croats can't do history because they can't read it
So they just dismiss it as non-existent
See no evil, hear no evil
:haha:
She probably doesn't even know that "White" Serbs and "White" Croats stands for "West" Serbs and "West" Croats, implying that they are not the source population, but a splitting off population. And yet, it's the "southern" serbs and croats that merely refer to themselves as...Serbs and Croats. Maybe because they were the original group from the east all along?
The notion that a small offshoot group from the north could just barge in and unite a bunch of disparate tribes spanning hundreds of kilometers because they had some unexplained authority is ludicrous
And yet, "White Croatia" doesn't exist at all today in the north, and "White Serbia" is reduced to a few tens of thousands of people.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 52,629/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 6,980/142 Given: 7,460/69 |
But the concept of Bosniaks being a distinct ethnicity was first brought up and promoted by Austria-Hungary (specifically Bani Kallay) to divide South Slavs. It may not have picked up momentum until later though.
https://books.google.com/books?id=Sm...osniak&f=false
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 52,629/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks