Why are Serbs more Interesting than Boring Croats?

[Lemgrant]

[Pribislav]

Dude, we have nothing against idea of Yugoslavia ruled by Croats (more advanced people) with Zagreb as capital. It would be surely more sucessful.
It's not like you know anything about Croat and Serb culture anyway. Larpy would be if we pretended to be eastern, and Serbs western.

After WW2 communists took industrial plants from Serbia and taken away them to the Croatia and Slovenia. Because of that Croatia was more developed than Serbia in Yugoslavia.
Btw Serbia is richer in natural resources than Croatia. In Serbia exist mines of gold, silver, copper, platinum, lead, wolfram etc. And Serbia has more fertile land than Croatia (agriculture in Vojvodina is more developed than in Slavonia, and there is more planted space).

[Jana]

After WW2 communists took industrial plants from Serbia and taken away them to the Croatia and Slovenia. Because of that Croatia was more developed than Serbia in Yugoslavia.
Btw Serbia is richer in natural resources than Croatia. In Serbia exist mines of gold, silver, copper, platinum, lead, wolfram etc. And Serbia has more fertile land than Croatia (agriculture in Vojvodina is more developed than in Slavonia, and there is more planted space).

LOL no. Croatia and Slovenia entered Yugoslavia far richer because they were part of Austro-Hungary and Serbia was part of Ottoman Empire.
Difference was very large except for Vojvodina which was Hungarian and rich.

Congo is world's richest country when it comes to mineral resources and it is a hellhole.

[Dušan]

After WW2 communists took industrial plants from Serbia and taken away them to the Croatia and Slovenia. Because of that Croatia was more developed than Serbia in Yugoslavia.
Btw Serbia is richer in natural resources than Croatia. In Serbia exist mines of gold, silver, copper, platinum, lead, wolfram etc. And Serbia has more fertile land than Croatia (agriculture in Vojvodina is more developed than in Slavonia, and there is more planted space).

Croatia without tourism is worse than Burkina Faso.
Their fate as a society is to be miserable seasonal servants.

[Voyt]

No I don't unfortunately, I am closer to these. Hungarians should be thankful for Croatian blood they have, it's enough to see how they look like and how Dalmatian Croats look like.
Panonnians are generally very ugly bunch compared to dinaric Slavs like Dalmatians and Montenegrins. You are typical example of pig faced Panonnian midget.

Hungarian men are hot because mix of German and Uralic like traits, those pure Panonnian Alpinids (including northern Croats) are nothing to write home about.

[Pribislav]

LOL no. Croatia and Slovenia entered Yugoslavia far richer because they were part of Austro-Hungary and Serbia was part of Ottoman Empire.
Difference was very large except for Vojvodina which was Hungarian and rich.

Mine of gold in Majdanpek in eastern Serbia has higher value than whole Croatian tourism.

I talking about potentials, not about life standard.

[Jana]

Croatia without tourism is worse than Burkina Faso.
Their fate as a society is to be miserable seasonal servants.

So miserable that Serbs come here as seasonal workers. Seems your Serbia is the bottom, imagine if for Serbs Croatia is good.
I can't imagine in what kind of shithole you live if Croatia is improvement for you.

[Daos777]

Croatia without tourism is worse than Burkina Faso.
Their fate as a society is to be miserable seasonal servants.

Can Croatia even sustain itself agriculturally? Because I heard Croatia farming land is kaka.

[Insuperable]

Croatia without tourism is worse than Burkina Faso.
Their fate as a society is to be miserable seasonal servants.

Subtract tourism from GDP and per capita Croatia is still richer than Serbia. What does that make Serbia then?

[Jana]

Can Croatia even sustain itself agriculturally? Because I heard Croatia farming land is kaka.

Agricultural Land in Slavonia is of premmium quality in Europe, just like in Vojvodina and Ukraine.