Gedmatch calculators on Vahaduo

[IrisSelene]

Distance: 0.2400% / 0.23997508
13.6 Kivutkalns19_Kivutkalns19_Latvia_730_400_y_old
10.8 Kura_Araxes
9.6 I1658_ArmeniaEBA
8.6 Chalcolithic_Age_Anatolian_Barcinhoyuk._Turkey_394 3_BC
7.4 Kretuonas2_Lithuania_5300_2900_y_old
6.6 KLEI10_KLEI10_Kleitos_Greece_4230_3995calBCE_years _old_g2a_k1a2
5.6 JK1968_Levaluhta
5.2 I0054_LBK
3.6 Motala012_Östergötland._Sweden_5000_BC
3.2 SA6003_ANCIENT_Sharakhalsun6_Catacomb_culture_4292
3.0 kal006_Sigtuna_10_12_century
2.6 CO1_Apc_Berekalja_I_Hungary_2700_2900_cal_BC
2.6 kal009_Sigtuna_10_12_century_f_t2f1
2.4 I0124_Samara_EHG
2.4 ZVEJ25_latvia_HG2_narva_7791_7586_BC5841_5636_calB C
1.8 scy192_scythian_2863_2503bce
1.6 RISE254_Szazhalombatta_Foldvar_Hungary_3631_years_ GHIJK_Z12203_J1c9
1.4 North_Norwegian_Hunter0Gatherer0STG001_Steigen._No rway_400003800_BC
1.4 scy301_scythian_Moldova_390_205bce
1.0 DA191_Hungary_Scythian_550_BC_550_bc
1.0 IA_Castel_di_Decima_R1016
1.0 kzb005_srubno_alakulskaya_1881_1692bce
0.8 HGDP00945_Yakut_Male_HGDP00945
0.4 Glz_Bai_Glz_Bai
0.4 VEK009_Velikent_Kura_Araxes_4850_J1_z1842_U4a2
0.2 Andronovo_RISE503_Russia_174601298_BC
0.2 I2477_Beaker_No_Steppe_Italy_4kya
0.2 KO1_Tiszaszolos_Domahaza_Hungary_5650_5780_cal_BC
0.2 MK3003_Marinskaya_3_Catacomb_4476_U4a2
0.2 RISE479_Erd_4_Hungary_2000_years_M_I_L1228_T2b
0.2 RISE548_Temrta_IV_Russia_2000_years_M_R_L23_U4
0.2 RISE550_PeshanyV_Russia_4312_years_M_R_M520_U5a1
0.2 RISE569_Early_Medieval_Czech_Brandysek_other_versi on_2000_years_H1af2
0.2 RK4002_Rasshevatskiy_4_4610_R1b1_U4d3
0.2 ZVEJ31_Latvia_MN2_6179_5750_BC4229_3800_cal_BC

[Carpatz]

[vbnetkhio]

It is not close to modern Hungarians.
At least according to K13.

one Hungarian Scythian sample was like a modern Hungarian, i guess it was another one.
this one is a pseudo South Slav, so South Slavs should try modelling without it

also this is just the beta version of the k13 ancient oracle, 100s of new samples will be added in the following days

[Dick]

one Hungarian Scythian sample was like a modern Hungarian, i guess it was another one.
this one is a pseudo South Slav, so South Slavs should try modelling without it

I think it's the outlier

[Moje ime]

yeah, kind of like modern Hungarians. but it's some Corded Ware influence, distantly related to Slavs

But it's no surprise. In MyTrueAncestry I have Gauls as first match.

[Ford]

Without the 195 Hungarian Scythian sample I get a slightly better fit

Target: Ford
Distance: 1.7658% / 1.76577184 | ADC: 0.25x
33.6 MJ12_Thraco_Kimmerian
26.8 Sungir6_Early_Medieval_Russian_I2a_I2a
22.8 DA191_Hungary_Scythian_550_BC_550_bc
13.4 RISE569_Early_Medieval_Czech_2000_years_F_H1af2
3.4 SZ1_SZ1

[WeirdLookingFellow]

Hello, fellow Scythians.

Distance to:	Fellow
4.40285135	DA195_Hungary_Scythian
12.08553681	SZ1_SZ1
12.63951344	DA199_Late_Medieval_Hungary
12.82664804	Halton
12.91634623	IA_Protovillanovan_Martinsicuro_R1
14.37973922	BR2_Hungary_1200_BC
14.80146277	SZ31_Longobard_M_T1a1a_PF5620_U4c2a_6-th_century
15.18022068	SZ31_Longobard_M_T1a1a_PF5620_U4c2a_6-th_century
15.34946253	RISE254_Szazhalombatta_Foldvar_Hungary_3631_years_GHIJK_Z12203_J1c9
15.75336155	scy301_scythian_Moldova_390_205bce

Distance to:	FellowGF
8.52195400	DA195_Hungary_Scythian
13.28682806	SZ1_SZ1
14.66846959	MJ12_Thraco_Kimmerian
15.05933597	IA_Protovillanovan_Martinsicuro_R1
15.90149993	DA199_Late_Medieval_Hungary
16.45845983	Halton
16.73367563	SZ31_Longobard_M_T1a1a_PF5620_U4c2a_6-th_century
16.76727766	scy301_scythian_Moldova_390_205bce
17.49465347	SZ31_Longobard_M_T1a1a_PF5620_U4c2a_6-th_century
18.00496598	sz31_szo029_Longobard_F_H74

Without the DA195

Target: FellowGF
Distance: 2.2142% / 2.21420240 | ADC: 0.25x
54.8	MJ12_Thraco_Kimmerian
18.8	DA191_Hungary_Scythian_550_BC_550_bc
18.6	Sungir6_Early_Medieval_Russian_I2a_I2a
4.4	SZ1_SZ1
3.0	XyH3_XyH3
0.4	K2_52_vengr_lider

Target: Fellow
Distance: 2.3794% / 2.37943519 | ADC: 0.25x
42.4	DA191_Hungary_Scythian_550_BC_550_bc
28.2	MJ12_Thraco_Kimmerian
23.6	SZ1_SZ1
5.8	SZ31_Longobard_M_T1a1a_PF5620_U4c2a_6-th_century

[Dušan]

one Hungarian Scythian sample was like a modern Hungarian, i guess it was another one.
this one is a pseudo South Slav, so South Slavs should try modelling without it

If I exclude that sample, I got this:










.

[IrisSelene]

19.02820801 Bavaria_STR310
20.30412027 Sunghir6
21.90382158 MedievalHungarian_DA199
21.98236111 Scythian_I0247
22.94500599 IA_Protovillanovan_Martinsicuro_R1
23.07837299 BR2_Hungary
23.56990454 Scythian_SCY311
23.65171030 Srubnaya_I0232
23.67258119 Sarmatian_Pokrovka_I0575
24.29578564 Andronovo_RISE505
24.36381128 HallstattCelt_DA112
24.41404923 EarlyBA_PL_N17
24.65777159 Ostuni1
24.80047177 EarlyCzechSlav_RISE569
25.35840689 Tagar_DA2
25.79716651 TianShanHun_DA81
25.80861872 BeakerBritain_I2443
26.00677989 Andronovo_DA231
26.25224181 Kipchak_DA179
26.34672845 BronzeAgeDalmatian_I4332
26.74383667 Andronovo_RISE500
26.87211938 IA_Civitavecchia_R474
26.95471202 BronzAgeBalkan
27.07037310 BronzAgeBulgarian
27.90608177 ArmeniaCA_I1631




Distance: 1.8126% / 1.81264331
49.8 Sunghir6
21.0 MakoCultureHungary_BR1
19.0 KurdistanChalcolithic_I1662
3.0 KurdistanChalcolithic_I1674
3.0 MesolithicNeolithicSerbia_I4871
2.0 ChalcolithicIranian
1.2 GoldenHorde_DA28
0.6 Kotias
0.4 Minoan_Lasithi_I0073

[bained]

Without DA195

Distance: 2.2469% / 2.24688061 | ADC: 0.25x
64.6 SZ31_Longobard_M_T1a1a_PF5620_U4c2a_6-th_century
16.0 MJ12_Thraco_Kimmerian
6.2 DA191_Hungary_Scythian_550_BC_550_bc
5.4 Kivutkalns164_Ancient_Inflanty
4.0 I0124_Samara_EHG
3.8 SZ1_SZ1