Gedmatch calculators on Vahaduo

[andre]

That's not my problem. My concern is about potentially unrepresentative samples being used as such.

Yes that's true, if you don't like tell to Lukasz to not upload it, no problem.

[Leto]

Good point, agree. I think this sample is good though, seems similar mix in modeling like one you describe is prevalent in Siberia.

Yeah, that sample is ok. For example I also posted another Siberian Russian, he is a genealogist (runs a web page about Siberian ancestry) and has a pretty good genealogical tree but he scores something like 4% South_Asian on Eurogenes which is very unusual. I wouldn't use one like that for example, although he might be a true Sibiryak personally.

[Leto]

With unrepresentative samples you'll end up having another Dodecad spreadsheet. Literally no Polish person gets a close distance to the "Polish" reference (according to Peterski). Totally off

[RyoHazuki]

Apparently I'm not closer to a half Frenchman and just 1/8 Morrocan Jew

Eurogenes K13 updated

Distance: 2.9820% / 2.98197995
85.6 West_Scottish
9.6 Moroccan_Jew
4.0 Southeast_English
0.4 Ethiopian_Ari_cultivator
0.2 Chamar
0.2 Ethiopian_Gumuz

[RyoHazuki]

PuntDNAL K15 works much better for me.

Modeling w. Germany and France

Distance: 3.0460% / 3.04599898
55.6 French
44.4 North_German

Modeling w. England and France

Distance: 3.6835% / 3.68349143
54.8 English
45.2 French

[Coastal Elite]

23andMe K13 Updated

Target: DacoCeltic
Distance: 2.7466% / 2.74661608 | ADC: 0.5x
66.4	West_German
19.8	Swiss_German
13.8	Bulgarian_Southwest

Target: DacoCeltic
Distance: 2.1017% / 2.10173211 | ADC: 0.25x
81.6	West_German
16.8	Bulgarian_Southwest
1.0	Lebanese_Druze
0.6	Velamas

Target: DacoCeltic
Distance: 1.1949% / 1.19486939
60.4	Southeast_English
19.8	Greek_Northern-Thrace
8.0	North-Dutch
4.2	Lebanese_Druze
3.6	Greek_Western-Macedonia
2.0	Torbeshi_North-Macedonia-Central
1.4	Velamas
0.4	Greek_Trabzon
0.2	Bulgarian_Southwest

Distance to:	DacoCeltic
4.40719866	Swiss_German
5.05291005	West_German
6.20721355	Swiss_French
7.10368918	South_Dutch
8.36893661	French
8.81395484	Hungarian_Transdanubia
9.20002174	German_West
9.50097363	Austrian
10.13219621	AostaValley
12.17303578	East_German
12.67016574	North_German
13.05168571	Southeast_English
13.11366463	Trentino
13.36306851	Friuli-VG
13.55240938	Hungarian_New
13.57464917	English
14.10908927	Danish
14.11596968	Swiss-Italian
14.38768918	HungarianTA
14.42687076	Swiss_Italian
14.83491153	Bulgarian_Dupnitsa
14.88455575	Hungarian_East
15.40259718	Veneto
15.40487910	Orcadian
15.40593717	Szekely

AncestryDNA K13 Updated

Target: DacoCeltic
Distance: 3.1515% / 3.15146685 | ADC: 0.5x
59.4	West_German
24.0	Swiss_French
12.2	AostaValley
3.6	Turk_Burgas
0.8	Kurd_Iran

Target: DacoCeltic
Distance: 2.1640% / 2.16399089 | ADC: 0.25x
75.8	West_German
18.2	AostaValley
4.0	Turk_East_Black_Sea
2.0	Lebanese_Druze

Target: DacoCeltic
Distance: 1.0798% / 1.07980737
67.6	Southeast_English
10.4	Greek_Western-Thrace
9.6	Turk_East_Black_Sea
8.6	Bulgarian_Southwest
3.6	Spanish_Valencia
0.2	Karitiana

Distance to:	DacoCeltic
4.92461166	Swiss_German
5.55372848	Swiss_French
5.94655362	West_German
7.29870536	French
7.66045691	South_Dutch
8.19735323	AostaValley
10.34178901	German_West
11.35629341	Hungarian_Transdanubia
11.93291666	Austrian
12.42264867	Trentino
12.56745002	Friuli-VG
13.00593711	Swiss-Italian
13.60425669	Swiss_Italian
13.64607270	Southeast_English
14.14187753	North_German
14.16175483	English
14.20691381	Veneto
14.22238377	Spanish_Cataluna
14.70344858	East_German
14.99103065	Piedmont
15.21182764	Portuguese
15.62553679	Southwest_English
15.68274211	Danish
15.77931557	Hungarian_New
15.81534065	Spanish_Galicia

[Lucas]

I will upload tomorrow those new refs.

Also I don't understand why some people on other forum have problem with 'updated' calc versions. For everyone such calc, original oracle version is preserved too.

They simply don't have to use it.

[Kyp]

With unrepresentative samples you'll end up having another Dodecad spreadsheet. Literally no Polish person gets a close distance to the "Polish" reference (according to Peterski). Totally off

What's wrong with the Dodecad spreadsheet? All samples I have added on there are averages of +7 kits at the very least. Same can't be said for other spreadsheets. It's the best for West Asia by far.

Eurogenes on the other hand at the moment has a lot of n=1 samples.

[Leto]

What's wrong with the Dodecad spreadsheet? All samples I have added on there are averages of +7 kits at the very least. Same can't be said for other spreadsheets. It's the best for West Asia by far.

Eurogenes on the other hand at the moment has a lot of n=1 samples.

I was talking about the original one. It's quite infamously bad.

[Kyp]

I was talking about the original one. It's quite infamously bad.

Yeah, I was going to mention, the samples that are bad and nonsensical are mostly the default ones