1


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 13,563/250 Given: 34,210/232 |
exact - in Romania nu a existat ucrainizare a numelor (cine sa le ucrainizeze, nu a fost niciodata teritoriul sub administratie ucraineana, din contra, sint constant rominizate), asa ca numele de familie ucrainiene indica descendenta din satele de ruteni si hutuli din nordul Moldovei


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,633/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,633/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 13,563/250 Given: 34,210/232 |
eu ziceam altceva - daca la voi e normal, pt ca ati avut administratie rusa, in Romania nu a existat niciodata o politica de ucrainizare a numelor, adica cele ucrainiene sint pur si simplu pt ca persoana are o mai apropiata sau mai departata origine ruteana sau hutula (judetele Maramures, Suceava si putin Botosani). la voi inteleg ca e normal, ca s-au pus terminatii -iuc si -ov asa la nume moldovenesti, aici nu s-a intimplat insa




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,514/44 Given: 1,505/11 |
Dude, perhaps you haven't looked at what has been posted here. You can't just ignore all the samples posted here.
We have breakdowns by district and those Moldovans are pretty typical for the South. Cahul Moldovans (also South) are similar to those from G25. My mom is 1/2 Southern (Cahul) and 1/2 Ukrainian. Her Moldovan/Romanian part seems to coincide with theirs.
There is a big difference here.
Your situation with the Macedonians not being accurate is similar to those of the old Moldavians (p2hter also used them because they are from Eurogenes). Davidski himself deleted them and messaged me that they are not representative, as he found that they are mixed with Russians. The G25 Moldovans on the other hand are collected by the Reich laboratory. Those are fully verified and handpicked as opposed to the unverified Macedonians and old Moldavians. For example, all the G25 Moldovans are recorded in the Reich lab, while your Macedonians are not on that list. Hence, I'm not surprised that their data is dubious.
https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/downlo...blished-papers




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 5,514/44 Given: 1,505/11 |
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Bookmarks