1


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 7,370/127 Given: 2,702/43 |
You can't reject hypothesis with Global25. G25 is meant to reproduce models deemed feasible by Admixtools (quoting Davidski here). But you can get good fits with these samples:
Not only the fits are good, but the models also make a lot of sense. A lot of Germanic in Swiss Germans, and more Celtic and Italic in Frenchies. By the way, i used all of the Iron Age Swiss samples for Celtic and all of the Iron Age Italian samples for Italic_IA.Code:Target: Swiss_French Distance: 1.2019% / 0.01201917 56.6 Italic_IA 26.8 Celtic 10.6 DEU_MA 6.0 ITA_Rome_Imperial Target: Swiss_German Distance: 0.9720% / 0.00972016 42.0 Italic_IA 40.2 DEU_MA 15.4 Celtic 2.4 ITA_Rome_Imperial


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 200/7 Given: 13/1 |
I believe the "pre-Celtic" label(the "proto-Celtic" one is erroneous, you can't have "proto-Cetls" and Celts in the same place at the same time, that's contradictory to the meaning of a "proto-language") is given to Lusitanians and some others to indicate that they are IE but came before Celts.





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 16,973/189 Given: 8,000/116 |
The Constance and St Gallen samples here look a lot more realistic for authentic Celts or Proto-Celts, especially coupled with the Lech EBA/MBA samples. The picture is becoming clearer.
![]()


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 200/7 Given: 13/1 |
There are still many >50% Steppe samples and only few ~30% Steppe samples, they were not like Basques.






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 29,760/1,198 Given: 24,478/603 |
They do indeed cluster the closest to Northern Europeans, Germanic and Insular Celtic peoples. Maybe they're of Bell Beaker culture of Central Europe when they got assimilated by the Celtic migrants coming from Western Europe without changing much of their genes? I guess the Romans did indeed changed their genes due to heavy admixture and so on.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 200/7 Given: 13/1 |






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 29,760/1,198 Given: 24,478/603 |
Hmm, then they could be mostly of Bell Beaker origins rather than coming from assimilated natives or mixed with the natives. I mean, the fact that the Swiss and others are genetically distinct from the late La Tene culture tells us that there had been admixtures and migrations to the region in Roman and early middle age periods. The Celts of Western Europe like France and Iberia seem genetically more or less distinct from these Celts, no?





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 16,973/189 Given: 8,000/116 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 200/7 Given: 13/1 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 11/0 Given: 8/0 |
At first, the Romans couldn't tell the Celts and Germanic people apart and often confused them for each other. Only later they found out that Celts and Germanic people were distinct ethnic groups and they started to differentiate between the two. The fact is that both were described as tall, very pale, light-haired and- blue-eyed people. Anyways, who would have thought that the Celts originated in Germany/Austria while ALL Germanic tribes originated in Scandivanivia to move from there to Germany?
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Bookmarks