0




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 315/10 Given: 110/0 |
Ζήτα και ότι ζητάς θα σου δοθεί
Ψάξε και ότι ψάχνεις θα το βρεις
Χτύπα την πόρτα κι αυτή θα σου ανοίξει




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 315/10 Given: 110/0 |
I see the Slavic agenda is well underway. Excellent. Of course noone cares to explain the complete lack of linguistic and cultural traces of Slavs in Greeks. Neither the simple fact that Greeks look clearly distinguishable from Bulgarians let alone Poles or Ukrainians. People know everything with almost no samples. Genetics means shit if they don`t allign with facts. Don`t forget Icelanders: they are much different than their ancestors because genetic drift.
Rant over.
Ζήτα και ότι ζητάς θα σου δοθεί
Ψάξε και ότι ψάχνεις θα το βρεις
Χτύπα την πόρτα κι αυτή θα σου ανοίξει


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,347/34 Given: 721/12 |
You guys need to pick one: either he is what he says he is - Pontic mixed with Russian or he's what his genetic results show - Pontic mixed with mainlander/west Anatolian Greek. Currently, you're picking and choosing details from each narrative without a proper justification.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 139/0 Given: 166/0 |
The problem is that you keep insinuating that ancient Greeks were more 'northern' shifted than they actually were. You do realize they came from Anatolia, right? And, their admixture was mostly Early Farmer mixed with some Kura-Araxes. Their steppe admixture was extremely minminal, so if we actually got Indo-European language from Yamnaya they didn't effect the admixture much of Greek or Anatolian cultures that picked up IE languages much at all.
Now, modern mainlanders except for Cretans and Greek islanders have completely lost the Kura-Araxes admixture and gained more Yamnaya admixture. When do you think this event occured? I know there is a big lack of ancient Greek samples, and if we have some from even the early AD period we'd be able to confirm or deny certain theories. But I don't know why you would be ashamed to have some slight South Slavic admixture anyways. Many Greeks have Albanian and Bulgarian ancestry, why do you not like the idea of that?
About language and culture - the people who moved into Greece were not 100% Slavs. They were our northern neighbours who already had some Slavic admixture, AKA south Slavs. You seem to think they are the same as a Ukrainian or something, but they're not. The admixture is similar to ours but lacking the Kura-Araxes as I showed before, now you need to stop coming up with conspiracy theories - mainland Greece was never isolated like Iceland so I'm not sure why you're making a comparison.
Honest question here, do you think Greek admixture remained the same during these events?
I doubt it, but I'm open to hear why you don't believe admixture did not change when there is so much evidence it did.




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 9,278/530 Given: 4,892/356 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 9,278/530 Given: 4,892/356 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,597/1,010 Given: 43,509/788 |
https://www.google.hr/search?q=slavi...EHr3XDUd9dMm6M
I really don't understand why some Greeks deny well documented Slavic settlement in Greece.
Even to this day there are slavophone villages in northern Greece, after all that assimilation.




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 9,278/530 Given: 4,892/356 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 9,048/383 Given: 14,230/1,009 |
Yeah and only in Northern Greece realy ,there were no slavophone regions in the rest of Greece
Slavs left some admixture in Mainland Greece but they didn't have a massive impact everywhere neither did they invade or dominate whole of Greece for a long time if they would there would be no Greece today but it would be just another Balkan Slavic country like Croatia,Serbia or Bulgaria but its not
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks