0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 9,048/383 Given: 14,230/1,009 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 9,048/383 Given: 14,230/1,009 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 9,048/383 Given: 14,230/1,009 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,225/268 Given: 3,479/195 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,225/268 Given: 3,479/195 |




| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 7,416/225 Given: 5,561/96 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 139/0 Given: 166/0 |
I have no idea how that user came up with the stats so it's not very scientific is it? It seems he posted some 'data he collected' but didn't give sources, so this data is honestly useless, since we have no idea how or where he collected it. Now, I read through that thread and people were saying things that were proven completely false since now we have a few samples (hopefully way more in future), so thanks for the read and laugh.
Here is results from real scientific study (https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article/24/6/1300/984002):
Again, it don't say which Aegean islands, but the amounts on the sites you are giving are obviously inflated compared to real numbers.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,225/268 Given: 3,479/195 |
In your "scientific" source the difference between Crete, islands and mainland Greece in terms of ev13 is even smaller than in my source, which means you technically confirm my claims (that ev13 is lower in dodecanese mainly becauze of assimilated levantines) and debunk your own better than i did, but regardless from if we agree or disagree the irony in your speech (thanks for laugh etc) shows that you're what in Greece we call "malakas" and don't worth any attention
You were completely clueless about "Aegean islands that were vastly repopulated by mainlanders" with zero sources supporting your claims, when we know that even of this is true for medieval times it technically is even more true for the classical period, resulting further levantine admixture in dodecanese.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks