R1a-z93 in Kyrgyz people. Explanation?

[aklifal]

Not really. Go and check every research. All they have found is mostly a caucasoid male lying besides a mongoloid female (and a horse).

Nope. Out of all samples gathered from the steppe coridor, none had a dominant mtDNA line. It's mixed as it goes.
http://open-genomes.org/analysis/Eur..._Gedmatch.html

Not to mention even westernmost scythians were morphologically mongoloids and had a significant mongoloid input in their aDNA. So your theory about handsome aryan men falls here. They were never cockasoids in first place.

Of course there are some mongoloid males with caucasoid females and other boring same type couples. But your "y-dna micronationalism" is just a
joke and has no chance to change the history.

I'm the one who tries to change history ? You're literally trying to whitewash turks here lmao.

"..and other boring same type couples" what kind of sick fetish is this

[eatensemn]

You're literally trying to whitewash turks here lmao.

Turks, or proto-turks horribly predate white concepts. And i strongly believe that important amount of mongoloid in early turks comes from actual mongolians, turks lived side by side with them.

[Bender1999]

Turks, or proto-turks horribly predate white concepts. And i strongly believe that important amount of mongoloid in early turks comes from actual mongolians, turks lived side by side with them.

Now thats wrong. I also think early turkics werent more than 50% east eurasian, except some cases, but they were at least 20-30% mongoloid. Even Xiognu were between 30-70%, they definitely played an important role of the ethnogenesis of early turkics.

[Bender1999]

double