Gedmatch calculators on Vahaduo

[Leto]

@Lucas please remove Kyrgyz_Bishkek from Dodecad, it's crap and I don't know who added it. One Kyrgyz would suffice.

[Lucas]

@Lucas please remove Kyrgyz_Bishkek from Dodecad, it's crap and I don't know who added it. One Kyrgyz would suffice.

OK

[Lucas]

@Lucas please remove Kyrgyz_Bishkek from Dodecad, it's crap and I don't know who added it. One Kyrgyz would suffice.

OK

[Leto]

Nepali averages for Dodecad K12b

Kiranti_Rai = 3 kits
Gurung = 3 kits
Newar_Shrestha = 5kits
Khas_Kshatriya = 8kits
Khas_Brahmin = 34 kits (1 duplicate removed)

Nepali_Kirant_Rai,1.06,9.20,0.00,18.58,0.00,0.06,7.66,0.02,0.00,62.67,0.22,0.54
Nepali_Gurung,3.76,9.38,0.08,16.33,0.05,0.25,13.91,0.15,0.00,55.76,0.10,0.22
Nepali_Newar_Shrestha,17.21,5.85,0.25,9.54,0.79,3.12,29.01,0.27,0.00,32.71,1.21,0.05
Nepali_Khas_Kshatriya,26.86,3.64,0.06,5.07,1.07,8.55,33.68,0.09,0.58,16.62,3.79,0.01
Nepali_Khas_Brahmin,33.65,1.83,0.09,1.39,2.44,13.76,35.33,0.06,0.54,4.38,6.47,0.05

[vbnetkhio]

most of the current Serb regional averages have way too little samples, less than 10. And they are all very similar to each other, so they can easily overflood one's oracles.
I merged regions that are identical or very similar into these 4 simplified averages:

Serb_north,25.11,30.70,16.57,9.04,14.65,1.53,0.53,0.32,0.57,0.43,0.43,0.06,0.04
Serb_central,25.13,29.35,17.05,8.71,15.72,1.62,0.57,0.26,0.66,0.50,0.28,0.10,0.05
Serb_south,23.36,27.16,17.57,9.33,18.39,1.96,0.44,0.18,0.84,0.35,0.28,0.00,0.15
Montenegrin,24.61,25.37,18.18,10.20,17.36,2.35,0.13,0.25,0.75,0.43,0.27,0.02,0.06

Serb,24.71,29.16,17.05,9.00,16.03,1.69,0.51,0.26,0.67,0.44,0.33,0.07,0.07

the approximate geographic distribution of these averages:


i think these should replace the current averages, if everybody agrees. but then the averages for other ethnicities should be simplified too.

[Jana]

most of the current Serb regional averages have way too little samples, less than 10. And they are all very similar to each other, so they can easily overflood one's oracles.
I merged regions that are identical or very similar into these 4 simplified averages:

Serb_north,25.11,30.70,16.57,9.04,14.65,1.53,0.53,0.32,0.57,0.43,0.43,0.06,0.04
Serb_central,25.13,29.35,17.05,8.71,15.72,1.62,0.57,0.26,0.66,0.50,0.28,0.10,0.05
Serb_south,23.36,27.16,17.57,9.33,18.39,1.96,0.44,0.18,0.84,0.35,0.28,0.00,0.15
Montenegrin,24.61,25.37,18.18,10.20,17.36,2.35,0.13,0.25,0.75,0.43,0.27,0.02,0.06

Serb,24.71,29.16,17.05,9.00,16.03,1.69,0.51,0.26,0.67,0.44,0.33,0.07,0.07

the approximate geographic distribution of these averages:


i think these should replace the current averages, if everybody agrees. but then the averages for other ethnicities should be simplified too.

Excellent idea, I want to do same for Croatian averages but am unable to do so myself.

My idea is as following:

Southern (Dalmatia, Lika, all of BiH)
North and Central (Zagorje, central)
Eastern (Slavonia)
Western (Istria and Primorje, Gorski kotar)

+ one general average

If you wish, you can do them. I posted few results recently in south Slav (Commonsense did too) thread that need to be added as well (from page 46 to the end)

[Lucas]

most of the current Serb regional averages have way too little samples, less than 10. And they are all very similar to each other, so they can easily overflood one's oracles.
I merged regions that are identical or very similar into these 4 simplified averages:

Serb_north,25.11,30.70,16.57,9.04,14.65,1.53,0.53,0.32,0.57,0.43,0.43,0.06,0.04
Serb_central,25.13,29.35,17.05,8.71,15.72,1.62,0.57,0.26,0.66,0.50,0.28,0.10,0.05
Serb_south,23.36,27.16,17.57,9.33,18.39,1.96,0.44,0.18,0.84,0.35,0.28,0.00,0.15
Montenegrin,24.61,25.37,18.18,10.20,17.36,2.35,0.13,0.25,0.75,0.43,0.27,0.02,0.06

Serb,24.71,29.16,17.05,9.00,16.03,1.69,0.51,0.26,0.67,0.44,0.33,0.07,0.07

the approximate geographic distribution of these averages:


i think these should replace the current averages, if everybody agrees. but then the averages for other ethnicities should be simplified too.

If they exist Romanian/Vlach samples form NE Serbia?

[Lucas]

most of the current Serb regional averages have way too little samples, less than 10. And they are all very similar to each other, so they can easily overflood one's oracles.
I merged regions that are identical or very similar into these 4 simplified averages:

Serb_north,25.11,30.70,16.57,9.04,14.65,1.53,0.53,0.32,0.57,0.43,0.43,0.06,0.04
Serb_central,25.13,29.35,17.05,8.71,15.72,1.62,0.57,0.26,0.66,0.50,0.28,0.10,0.05
Serb_south,23.36,27.16,17.57,9.33,18.39,1.96,0.44,0.18,0.84,0.35,0.28,0.00,0.15
Montenegrin,24.61,25.37,18.18,10.20,17.36,2.35,0.13,0.25,0.75,0.43,0.27,0.02,0.06

Serb,24.71,29.16,17.05,9.00,16.03,1.69,0.51,0.26,0.67,0.44,0.33,0.07,0.07

the approximate geographic distribution of these averages:


i think these should replace the current averages, if everybody agrees. but then the averages for other ethnicities should be simplified too.

Add it instead of what is now or leave old regional too?

[Leto]

Lukasz, please finish the latest Creoda update

[Dušan]

most of the current Serb regional averages have way too little samples, less than 10. And they are all very similar to each other, so they can easily overflood one's oracles.
I merged regions that are identical or very similar into these 4 simplified averages:

Serb_north,25.11,30.70,16.57,9.04,14.65,1.53,0.53,0.32,0.57,0.43,0.43,0.06,0.04
Serb_central,25.13,29.35,17.05,8.71,15.72,1.62,0.57,0.26,0.66,0.50,0.28,0.10,0.05
Serb_south,23.36,27.16,17.57,9.33,18.39,1.96,0.44,0.18,0.84,0.35,0.28,0.00,0.15
Montenegrin,24.61,25.37,18.18,10.20,17.36,2.35,0.13,0.25,0.75,0.43,0.27,0.02,0.06

Serb,24.71,29.16,17.05,9.00,16.03,1.69,0.51,0.26,0.67,0.44,0.33,0.07,0.07

the approximate geographic distribution of these averages:


i think these should replace the current averages, if everybody agrees. but then the averages for other ethnicities should be simplified too.

Ok, but why is general Serb average changed?

This one seems correct

Serb,24.72,29.47,17.13,9.20,15.42,1.55,0.55,0.27,0.72,0.53,0.30,0.08,0.05