0


Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 4,102/27 Given: 3,278/4 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,319/30 Given: 2,681/16 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,319/30 Given: 2,681/16 |
If Creoda wants to add more German regions better to make for whole former West Germany north-west, central-west, south-west and south-east. If we follow the rule to not make too many small regions in K13 updated sheet.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 5,514/44 Given: 1,505/11 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
Here is the map
Alsace and Provence can remain, I think. Those are widely known regions. But the rest are less obvious except for Central of course.
Armorica = Northwest_French
Belgica = Northeast_French
Aquitania = Southwest_French
Languedoc = South_French
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 52,629/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Germany is at least most populous European country if Russia is excluded. But I agree. Italy, Spain and Greece have too many averages for example.
I am suprised there isn't western Polish average by the way, pretty sure Peterski can easily make one if he wants. Because from what I saw they are genetically distinct from you for example.
Such average would be an improvement.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 116/4 Given: 218/6 |
Hmm, Italy and Spain are incomparable to Greece with the size of the country and population. Italy and Spain, excluding Russia (and Turkey), are Top 5 European countries by population so it's fine if they have more than double 4-5 regional averages based on their administrative division. Greece (~10 million) has a population that is two times lower than Romania (~20 million), and almost the same thing is about their respective country area. Besides Italy and Spain, Germany, France, England, Ukraine, Poland, Romania, and the Netherlands statistically should or can have more than double 4-5 regional averages, perhaps according to their administrative division or else.
I'm not familiar with the administrative and historical/genetical division of Romania and Romanians and didn't check it now, but currently, there are 10 regional averages, perhaps should be lowered to 7, having averaged Romania_Moldavia and removing Muntenia and Oltenia if Wallachia is their average.
Last edited by MoroLP; 12-14-2020 at 07:31 PM.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
Let's keep in mind not all countries can be simply divided into North, South, etc. Some nations do have a more complex genetic history. Also many countries are unevenly populated. I know most people here are European but let's look at Egypt for example. Obviously the Nile valley would be the most important
Spoiler!
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 52,629/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Agree, but Greece has far more genetic diversity than Spain for example. Iberians are very homogenous considering how big and populous their peninsula is.
Greece has Anatolian Greeks, Pontics, Islanders, Mainlanders, Cypriots, they are all very different from each other. But even with that having almost 30 averages is simply far too much.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 7,319/30 Given: 2,681/16 |
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks