5


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,465/7 Given: 1,535/1 |
a new version of ADMIXTOOLS is out:
https://uqrmaie1.github.io/admixtools/index.html
it's faster and more user friendly.
has anybody tried it out yet?


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,465/7 Given: 1,535/1 |
I'm getting this error, i'm trying to figure out what's causing it.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,465/7 Given: 1,535/1 |
this is when I filter out the missing SNPs (By default, extract_f2() will be very cautious and exclude all SNPs which are missing in any population):
![]()


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,465/7 Given: 1,535/1 |
populations used:
left
Russia_Sunghir6.SG
Greece_BA_Mycenaean
right
Russia_Afanasievo
Luxembourg_Loschbour
Russia_HG_Karelia
Anatolia_N
Poland_Globular_Amphora
Iran_GanjDareh_N
Kazakhstan_Eneolithic_Botai
Georgia_Kotias.SG
Morocco_Iberomaurusian
Nganasan
Papuan
Ami
ONG.SG
South_Africa_400BP.SG
Kenya_PastoralN
target
Serb
any recommendation is welcome.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,102/27 Given: 3,278/4 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 15,697/315 Given: 8,913/358 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,102/27 Given: 3,278/4 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,465/7 Given: 1,535/1 |
according to this, Estonia BA passes as a Slavic proxy for Serbs (p-value 0.1) and the Hungarian Slavs don't (0.02 and 0.0006)
am I doing something wrong?
edit: I mixed up Estonia_IA and Estonia_BA. Estonia IA was Uralic admixed, Estonia BA was still purely Balto-Slavic, so it makes some sense after all.Code:pat wt dof chisq p f4rank Greece_BA_Mycenaean Estonia_BA.SG feasible best dofdiff chisqdiff p_nested1 00 0 15 20.6 1.50e- 1 1 0.480 0.520 TRUE NA NA NA NA 2 01 1 16 341. 7.57e-63 0 1 NA TRUE TRUE 0 36.2 0 3 10 1 16 305. 2.54e-55 0 NA 1 TRUE TRUE NA NA NA pat wt dof chisq p f4rank Greece_BA_Mycenaean Hungary_AvarPeriod feasible best dofdiff chisqdiff p_nested 1 00 0 15 27.5 2.52e- 2 1 0.255 0.745 TRUE NA NA NA NA 2 01 1 16 333. 3.24e-61 0 1 NA TRUE TRUE 0 292. 0 3 10 1 16 41.6 4.52e- 4 0 NA 1 TRUE TRUE NA NA NA pat wt dof chisq p f4rank Russia_Sunghir6.SG Greece_BA_Mycenaean Hungary_Avar_daughter.or.mother.AV1 feasible best dofdiff chisqdiff p_nested 1 000 0 14 15.5 3.43e- 1 2 0.670 0.347 -0.0176 FALSE NA NA NA NA 2 001 1 15 16.2 3.70e- 1 1 0.654 0.346 NA TRUE TRUE 0 -12.2 1 3 010 1 15 28.4 1.93e- 2 1 2.71 NA -1.71 FALSE TRUE 0 -10.7 1 4 100 1 15 39.1 6.19e- 4 1 NA 0.368 0.632 TRUE TRUE NA NA NA 5 011 2 16 50.0 2.29e- 5 0 1 NA NA TRUE NA NA NA NA 6 101 2 16 314. 3.55e-57 0 NA 1 NA TRUE NA NA NA NA 7 110 2 16 74.4 1.70e- 9 0 NA NA 1 TRUE NA NA NA NA
Last edited by vbnetkhio; 01-06-2021 at 07:28 PM.





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,250/11 Given: 524/7 |
I think the outgroup set EurasianDNA used is good because they are high quality and have high SNP overlap with your test subjects plus they can differentiate streams of ancestry well
For Serbs you can start out with higher quality neolithic farmer samples + Iron gates Whg + relevant MLBA steppe + Iron age steppe/turkic
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks