1


Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,250/11 Given: 524/7 |
I've yet to see an actual Russian spend 99% of their time on W. and S. Asians. I wouldn't be surprised if someone told me he's from that part of AsiaAs far as Kyp he hasn't given me any reason to believe he's other than German-Azeri but to me he seems like he likes to Turkify Azeris as much as possible where everything I've read indicates that Iranian Azeris are probably descended from the same genetic pool as Kurds. You can see it in the calculator oracles where Kurds sometimes get Azeri in 1st or 2nd position.
Having said this they do seem to both have a good interest in genetics but they need to expand their sphere of knowledge outside of Gedmatch and G25 and start reading more papers if they want to gain a better understanding of genetics.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,096/184 Given: 1,505/100 |
And before you start to cite Wikipedia again.
Wikipedia does not consider itself as a reliable source. Even the founder says so.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPa0vxC6NA0&t=240s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0YDn7wbwh-k&t=6s
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipe...l%20the%20time.
Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Wikipedia can be edited by anyone at any time. This means that any information it contains at any particular time could be vandalism, a work in progress, or just plain wrong. Biographies of living persons, subjects that happen to be in the news, and politically or culturally contentious topics are especially vulnerable to these issues. Edits on Wikipedia that are in error may eventually be fixed. However, because Wikipedia is a volunteer-run project, it cannot monitor every contribution all the time. There are many errors that remain unnoticed for days, weeks, months, or even years. Therefore, Wikipedia should not be considered a definitive source in and of itself.
I have seen this quite allot. A website being used as source that quotes Wikipedia itself. To create the image that many sources agree with it lol.Sources accepted as reliable for Wikipedia may in fact rely on Wikipedia as a reference source, sometimes indirectly. If the original information in Wikipedia was false, once it has been reported in sources considered reliable, Wikipedia may use them to reference the false information, giving an apparent respectability to a falsehood. This in turn increases the likelihood of the false information being reported in other media.[109] A known example is the Sacha Baron Cohen article, where false information added in Wikipedia was apparently used by two newspapers, leading to it being treated as reliable in Wikipedia.[110] This process of creating reliable sources for false facts has been termed "citogenesis" by webcomic artist Randall Munroe.[111][112][113]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reliability_of_WikipediaSomewhat related to the "information loop", but perhaps more worrisome, is the propagation of misinformation to other websites (Answers.com is just one of many) which will often quote misinformation from Wikipedia verbatim, and without mentioning that it has come from Wikipedia. A piece of misinformation originally taken from a Wikipedia article will live on in perhaps dozens of other websites, even if Wikipedia itself has deleted the unreliable material.[114]
Next time think twice before you cite Wikipedia.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,096/184 Given: 1,505/100 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,250/11 Given: 524/7 |
Ok I did indicate which ones were genetically Kurds and which were borderline Kurd-Azeri based on the IBD formal stats and other analysis however, the one I thought were Kurds didn't have the averages you posted which is why I thought it best for the authors to supply that type of info.
Wrt to Dodecad K12 who removed the Dodecad K12 creater Kurd averages because those averages where the ones consistent with Iraqi Kurds and the Soranis and Feylis posted on Palisto's Kurdish DNA blog ?
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,699/66 Given: 8,957/110 |
I added some confirmed Iranian Kurds too from my spreadsheet (but not many) that's why the average is a bit different I think.
The problem with the samples is, that it could probably include 1 or 2 Azeris while missing Kurds who were closer to the Central Iranian cluster, that's why I said it should not be added. I thought it would be interesting to see nonetheless.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
I am Russian but a lot of those ethnicities are/were under Russian or Soviet rule. I grew up seeing a lot of Armenians, Azerbaijanis, later on Central Asians and other migrants joined them. I don't know why I have to explain this. TA doesn't have many West or Central Asians. How many Uzbeks, Tajiks, Kyrgyz, Dagestanis, Georgians, etc. are there on this forum? And how many of them are interested in Dodecad or genetics in general?
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
MOST of the original Dodecad spreadsheet is seriously inaccurate, largely due to the calculator effect. That was the reason why we started to update it.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,699/66 Given: 8,957/110 |
Tajik:
Gedrosian: 28.19
Siberian: 5.17
Northwest_African: 0.11
Southeast_Asian: 1.37
Atlantic_Med: 3.88
North_European: 18.72
South_Asian: 8.52
East_African: 0.00
Southwest_Asian: 3.87
East_Asian: 6.89
Caucasian: 23.37
Sub_Saharan: 0.00
Distance to: Tajik
3.19859344 Tajik_Tajikistan
8.08600643 Yagnobi
8.11810939 Tajiks
9.50598759 Tajik_Herat
10.20771277 Turkmen_TM
10.31474188 Pamiri_Shughnan
10.49900471 Pamiri_Rushan
10.92007784 Tajik_Balkh
11.24976889 Pamiri_Ishkashim
12.37387571 Turkmen_Iran
13.37516729 Pashtun_Kandahar
13.99586725 Tajik_Kabul
15.31454537 Iran_Khorasan
16.19692255 Turkmen_Uzbekistan
16.86333893 Tajik_Panjshir&Kapisa
17.81501052 Tabasaran
17.84757406 Lezgin
17.89149239 Qumuq
18.16337799 Avar
18.88724173 Kho
18.91562582 Dargin
18.98190454 Pashtun_Tarkalani
18.99687869 Uzbek
18.99698924 Lak2
Target: Tajik_Dushanbe
Distance: 2.1082% / 2.10819410 | ADC: 0.5x RC
72.9 Tajik_Tajikistan
14.5 Tajik_Herat
10.4 Tabasaran
2.2 Turkmen_TM
Last edited by Kyp; 01-07-2021 at 09:52 AM.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
FINALLY something worthwhile in this sea of bullshit! Guys, if you don't like this calc, you are free to fucking LEAVE! Don't spam the thread with lengthy posts that do not contain actual Dodecad results. Otherwise we'll have to close this shit down.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
He is most likely from elsewhere, or his parents were. Dushanbe was a majority Russian and Russian-speaking city until the 1980s. Russian, Tatars, Jews, Koreans and a minority of Uzbeks and Tajiks (educated in Russian-medium schools).
Y-DNA?
I have changed the Tajik references, it should be Tajik_Lowland (Hisar and Kulob) and Tajik_Mountain (Ayni). Luke hasn't updated them.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks