Classify Spaniard far-right activist Isabel Peralta

[JamesBond007]

She is actually very smart and not an ignorant at all. This article from her proves it quite well: https://elcorreodeespana.com/politic...l-Peralta.html

Not really , you don't have to be far right to be philosophically against feminism. One can be a classical liberal like John Locke or what is known as a libertarian in the USA. I believe men are so superior to women that under a free society (non-tyrannical) that men will outcompete women , which will put them in a superior position, thus solving problems of female hypergamy etc... also , under a libetarianism the government will be too small to be a surrogate father for women and will not be able to strip men in court of their riches at the behest of a digruntled wife (alimony etc..)

The free society will always eclipse the unfree one; for while totalitarianism may forbid the bad, it can never compel the good -- something which arises spontaneously among free men.

^ Notice they don't have libertarian atheists on there and if they did they might outscore everyone else perhaps.

[Suinthila]

Bro are you really a Senegalese, a Jew and a Gypsy and Moor or is that just trolling and how does Cristiano Viejo perceives you?

I don't know, Morti. Ask him...

Are you lutheran or catholic, Morti?

[Mortimer]

I don't know, Morti. Ask him...

Are you lutheran or catholic, Morti?

Orthodox but Im in the process to become Catholic officially. I want to convert.

[Suinthila]

Orthodox but Im in the process to become Catholic officially. I want to convert.

I was given my ancestry that I show through a very sofisticated DNA analyse, Morti (I forgot to tell you)

And what's really the difference between catholic and orthodox, they're closer than to lutheranism, I think. Is it true?

[Mortimer]

I was given my ancestry that I show through a very sofisticated DNA analyse, Morti (I forgot to tell you)

And what's really the difference between catholic and orthodox, they're closer than to lutheranism, I think. Is it true?

Yes I agree orthodox and catholics are closer in my opinion

[Zeno]

Not really , you don't have to be far right to be philosophically against feminism. One can be a classical liberal like John Locke or what is known as a libertarian in the USA. I believe men are so superior to women that under a free society (non-tyrannical) that men will outcompete women , which will put them in a superior position, thus solving problems of female hypergamy etc... also , under a libetarianism the government will be too small to be a surrogate father for women and will not be able to strip men in court of their riches at the behest of a digruntled wife (alimony etc..)

The free society will always eclipse the unfree one; for while totalitarianism may forbid the bad, it can never compel the good -- something which arises spontaneously among free men.

^ Notice they don't have libertarian atheists on there and if they did they might outscore everyone else perhaps.

I've seen this chart again and again used by the clearly """""""intellectual"""""" far left, and suffice to say, it is absolute bogus and clearly biased, I mean it was conducted by Kazanawa, who is biased towards the left but got controversy when in only one of his studies concluded that the low African intelligence quotient leads to their absolute poverty.

A critical analysis written by psychologist Shawn T. Smith shows how this study has an atrocious methodology (I unironically wonder how it's still circulating) and how it just proves a pet theory:

https://docsmith.co/2010/04/are-libe...says-it-is-so/

[Universe]

In the speech she said that it was all the fault of the jew "el judio", but after the criticism she clarified that she was referring only to a jew (George Soros)

I think far right people should just stop bringing up jews. It doesn't help their situation.

[Centurion]

I think far right people should just stop bringing up jews. It doesn't help their situation.

It doesn't help very much either when the far-right don't bring up the jews. For example there was that far right group Génération Identitaire in France which has always engaged itself to not talk about the jews, to not attack them. Yet they have recently been forcefully dissolved by the French state by jewish politicians and at the demand of jewish "anti-racist" organisations.

Trump have spent the whole past 5 years sucking jews's cocks and accomplish most of the zionist agenda, all of this to be constantly attacked by jews, lost a fraudulent election, being betrayed by most of his camp, not receiving any help from the "right-wing" jews and be replaced by Biden whom 50% at least of the government is composed of jews.

There's often that feeling among white goyim that if they turn the other cheek to the jews, they will act more fairly toward them or they will be less attacked by the system and by the medias. Nothing is further from the truth.

That girl denounce the ZOG and she is right to do it. It's very telling to see how all the Spaniard press get hysterical toward her and denounce her, from the far-left to the cuckold falafel "far-right". When the ZOG is named for what it is, it get panicked, it's even more true there since as a teenage girl she will be harder to censor than an older man. Trying to sugarcoat truths about the ZOG has very limited benefits, if it has any. It's a strategy which will always have to stop sooner or later, and the sooner is often the better.

[Suinthila]

I think far right people should just stop bringing up jews. It doesn't help their situation.

She didn't say "los judíos", but "el judío", it's quite different

[Creoda]

I think far right people should just stop bringing up jews. It doesn't help their situation.

IMO the far right should stop talking about immigration and race, lest we be called racist.

Our main target needs to be identity politics, Ezra Levant, Ben Shapiro etc have shown the way here.