Haplogroup profile of Indigenous(Proto)Europeans - Identified and Unidentified.

[Scandal]

It is wrong. Too old. Maybe counting parially some EHG as WHG. Even logically not possible, if for example SHG had allready 50% of it, Neolithic Balkans 2%, Cucuteni 20%, GAC 25%. And then Indoeuropeans arrived, and surelly did not bring with themselves so much whg, to make this even higher than in neolithic local community. Quite opposite, not only this dropped because of the huge new population, but was yet additionaly decimated by wars, gnocides and diseases.

That study in the picture is also quite old, I remember seeing it around 2015 or 2016. EHG was ANE+WHG. WHG is older component than EHG and ANE.

There are yamaya results at the bottom of the study I linked, WHG score is bolded :

Yamnaya (Russia/Ukraine, 3000BC) (n=6)
34.69% 4.76% 23.94% 0 35.86% 0.53% 0.14% 0.07%

[Defcon2]

It is wrong. Too old. Maybe counting parially some EHG as WHG. Even logically not possible, if for example SHG had allready 50% of it, Neolithic Balkans 2%, Cucuteni 20%, GAC 25%. And then Indoeuropeans arrived, and surelly did not bring with themselves so much whg, to make this even higher than in neolithic local community. Quite opposite, not only this dropped because of the huge new population, but was yet additionaly decimated by wars, gnocides and diseases.

Spoiler!

Modern Spaniards don't have WHG?