0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,816/15 Given: 1,621/4 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 333/10 Given: 233/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 421/0 Given: 606/0 |
Some ancient French samples show a signal of MAR_Taforalt component, etc. It's no big deal.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 4,083/175 Given: 1,712/89 |
The Guanche skulls as a whole are unlike those of modern European Mediterraneans, and resemble northern European series most closely, especially those in which a brachycephalic element is present, as in Burgundian and Alemanni series.divided them into clearly differentiated types, which include a Mediterranean, a Nordic, a "Guanche," and an Alpine. The "Guanche" accounts for 50 per cent of the whole on the four islands of Teneriffe, Gomera, Gran Canaria, and Hierro; the Nordic for 31 per cent, the Mediterranean for 13 per cent, and the Alpineoldschool anthropology


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 13,599/250 Given: 34,265/232 |
the calculator is experimental and, like any calc I've seen, needs improvements. I am happy to learn things I didn't know, so thank you to those that took the time to add such details to the thread


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 13,599/250 Given: 34,265/232 |
actually I think you are partially right: our specific traits come from specific genes, not genome-wide picture, so if genome-wide mapping can tell us sometimes with great precision where we are from or in case we are a mix, what are our macro-components in terms of ancestry, it doesn't tell us what we may look like, and in the future maybe some tests could look at that as well, to be able to group people on a plot based on similar traits, alone or combined



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 333/10 Given: 233/0 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,249/169 Given: 1,440/2 |
Wrong, it is just that commercial DNA tests are not scientific they don't want to contradict any potentially wrong preconceived notions about customers identity they might have and G25 is amateur mentally retatarded slavic science. Alright, I am being a little too harsh on G25 but the truth is that is too fine-grained especially for modern populations.
So, who is the master of physical anthropology here ? Arguably xenophobic Prussian. He puts me in Wales/Cornwall/Devonshire Britain . So, you don't want more generalized qpAdm/admix results because it's ultra nerdy ? Perfect is the enemy of good enough :
MyTrueAncestry :
1. Southwest_English (4.205)
2. Southeast_English (4.275)
3. North_Dutch (4.390)
4. Danish (4.722)
5. West_Scottish (4.930)
6. Irish (5.014)
7. Orcadian (5.114)
8. North_German (6.151)
Ok, so the average Englishman is probably about 21 percent Celtic/Irish or whatever. However, being from SouthWest England there can be more Celtic input. MTA FTW , again:
30 % Celtic with rest various Germanic tribes e.g. Saxons, Danish vikings, Franks, Norwegian vikings etc..
Is it telling me nerd shit like how much Steppe, WHG, and Baltic HG etc...I am ? No ! However, who cares if G25 is wrong ? Ok, G25 is flexible and nerdy but not always correct so fuck it ! MTA can tell me how much I match to some samples in ancient Britain it seems , as well , but I won't paste it here.
Also , phenotype is only a subset of genes of the underlying genotype so you can't rely solely on old-school anthropology.
The truth is out there my man !
*edit , yeah go ahead clowns continue looking down your noses at MyTrueAncestry ya'll niggers is sleeping on MTA and straight trippin' *


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 421/0 Given: 606/0 |
To be honest, i used an old datasheet with outdated coordinates. When i check the MAR_Taforalt signal in the ancient French samples using the official Eurogenes Global25 datasheet
the signal is very weak.
Capture d’écran 2021-05-16 à 10.18.33.png
nb: with Nurzat code/calculator


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 421/0 Given: 606/0 |
delete
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks