0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 8,460/336 Given: 6,767/70 |
Yes, they are. Even Italians from Marche which is closer to Alps than to Calabria or Sicily have East Med as the strongest component. Calabria/Sicily are on the same latitude as Andalucia, and Andalucians are quite more northern shifted than Calabrians and Sicilians.
![]()



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 19,314/97 Given: 15,034/51 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 63,331/2,660 Given: 65,772/942 |
Macedonia and Bulgaria


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,620/1,011 Given: 43,526/788 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,620/1,011 Given: 43,526/788 |
It's not a deep south Italian and that was just a modern model which is irrelevant. I posted G25 models above with actual ancient samples.
Irrelevant, neither are north Slavs pure Slavs and neither were Paleo Balkanites like south Italians.We could be modeled as Northern Slavs and Southern Italians. Deal with it.
And btw, ancient samples like Sunghir aren't pure either.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 8,460/336 Given: 6,767/70 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,620/1,011 Given: 43,526/788 |
Pure Slavs were like this:
(Balto-)Slavic:HUN_Avar_Szolad_Av2,0.134311,0.126941,0.08 1458,0.065569,0.035391,0.033746,0.00987,0.005769,0 .004704,-0.02278,-0.002436,-0.005395,0.01219,0.020643,-0.015201,-0.003845,0.005867,0.004561,0.008673,5e-04,0.001497,-0.00272,0.013804,-0.007109,0.002634
(Balto-)SlavicEU_Krakauer_Berg_MA_KRA001,0.129758,0.125926,0.075 424,0.072029,0.046778,0.026774,0.011986,0.010384,-0.001636,-0.021322,-0.003085,-0.006294,0.008028,0.021194,-0.013843,0.013789,0.019036,-0.005701,0.00352,0.005378,0.004991,-0.008408,0.000986,-0.006145,0.001796
(Balto-)SlavicEU_Krakauer_Berg_MA_KRA009,0.126344,0.127957,0.067 127,0.070737,0.042162,0.02008,0.011281,0.014999,-0.001023,-0.032802,-0.001949,-0.01124,0.017542,0.01968,-0.012893,0.007558,0.011604,0.00114,0.005782,0.0115 06,-0.010357,0.003091,0.007765,-0.008796,-0.001676
(Balto-)SlavicEU_Krakauer_Berg_MA_KRA011,0.125205,0.129988,0.078 818,0.072675,0.047701,0.027889,0.013161,0.006692,0 .005522,-0.020593,-0.00065,-0.009292,0.018583,0.027249,-0.011672,-0.010342,-0.006389,0.00266,0.008045,0.002876,-0.011729,-0.008037,0.007272,-0.003494,0.003952
(Balto-)Slavic:Moravia_POH13,0.127482,0.132019,0.083721,0 .078489,0.050471,0.026495,0.00517,0.018922,0.00429 5,-0.028429,-0.004384,-0.006744,0.017988,0.043076,-0.008143,-0.011668,0.005346,0.000507,0.004022,0.012256,-0.012228,-0.008903,0.01368,-0.013496,-0.002395
(Balto-)Slavic:Moravia_POH28,0.141141,0.136081,0.087492,0 .081719,0.047086,0.027052,0.019976,0.023999,0.0106 35,-0.01385,-0.001299,-0.014537,0.027502,0.03647,-0.015065,-0.007425,-0.014473,-0.005954,-0.005531,0,-0.007237,-0.004204,0.000616,-0.00964,-0.002275
this is how they score on G25:
Spoiler!


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,620/1,011 Given: 43,526/788 |
They are not most southern Shifted Iberians at all if that is what you are implying.
Italy got heavily woggified with Imperial Romans but later got some additional northern input from migrating Germanics.You can compare every region of Italy and Iberia which are on the same latitude, and Iberians are always more northern shifted.
Iberians are most northern shifted southern Europeans.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,620/1,011 Given: 43,526/788 |
My results when using above mentioned ancient Slavs and Illyrians from Croatia and Hungary (I remove Thracian from source who would artificaly increase my Slavic because I have zero Thracian)
Target: Stearsolina_scaled
Distance: 2.2310% / 0.02230987
60.2 (Balto-)Slavic
39.8 Balkan


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 8,444/56 Given: 8,697/5 |
I guess Macedonians or Bulgarians or Pomaks; The latter could maybe get under the proto Slav level of Macedonians if they additionally assimilated some Anatolian Turks.
I agree.
If you have G25 coords I'd be curious about the result in the calculator in my signature. I regard that calculator good, especially also the tranparency where the single ancient source samples are visible.
Here's a pic I made some time ago for a number of ethnicities out of that mentioned calculator. Here Bulgarians do have the lowest level (38.2%) among Slavic speakers. Unfortunately Macedonians are not contained in the table.
EDIT: It seems not to be Macedonians as they seem to have more than Bulgarians:
Target: Macedonian
Distance: 0.7305% / 0.00730540
46.4 (Balto-)Slavic
37.0 Graeco-Roman
16.6 Balkan
Last edited by rothaer; 12-06-2021 at 10:45 AM.
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks