Page 24 of 30 FirstFirst ... 14202122232425262728 ... LastLast
Results 231 to 240 of 291

Thread: Who, genetically, are the least Slavic of the Slavs?

  1. #231
    Inactive KirillMazur's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2020
    Last Online
    03-30-2026 @ 07:20 PM
    Location
    Moscow/Sevastopol
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Eastern Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Russian
    Ancestry
    37,5% Russian/25% Belorussian/25% Jewish/12,5% Volga Finnic
    Country
    Russia
    Politics
    Sports&Spirits
    Relationship Status
    Married parent
    Gender
    Posts
    3,818
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 5,549/27
    Given: 6,371/0

    2 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stearsolina View Post
    And I think Ukrainians and south Russians have something more southern than that (obviously they don't plot between Belarus and Litwa), maybe of Iranic-Caucasus sort (not sure).
    Yes wild fields were re-settled from north and west but still, from what I saw, previous occupants are never truly erased from DNA, some people always remain and intermix.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stearsolina View Post
    Scyths and Sarmats were huge tribes in Ukraine area, I simply don't buy expanding Slavs absorbed none of such admixture but just steppe Turks did.
    So now I am not talking about Russo-Turkish wars but centuries before that.

    Iranic nomads were large mass of people who couldn't vanish just like that!
    And I think that sort of light substratum may explain why Ukrainians and southern Russians don't plot like early Slavic samples from Germany, Moravia and Hungary.
    True 100%. Since I am outside genetics, I have no numbers, but my eyes and brain for 20 years of life in the Crimea and 2 years in the Odessa region confirm this. Here is a different substrate compared to the Moscow region, not to mention the more northern regions. But there are also many "northern" settlers.
    Whatever one may say, multi-million people do not disappear without a trace.

  2. #232
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    10-25-2025 @ 02:00 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Indo-European, Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Russian (privately view myself as Aryan)
    Country
    Brunei
    Region
    Russian Turkestan General Governorship
    Y-DNA
    R1a-Z282-YP350
    Religion
    Orthodox Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    24,264
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 15,697/315
    Given: 8,913/358

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KirillMazur View Post
    True 100%. Since I am outside genetics, I have no numbers, but my eyes and brain for 20 years of life in the Crimea and 2 years in the Odessa region confirm this. Here is a different substrate compared to the Moscow region, not to mention the more northern regions. But there are also many "northern" settlers.
    Whatever one may say, multi-million people do not disappear without a trace.
    Those groups weren't "multi-million" though. It's not like a group of Slavs would have magically assimilated hordes of non-Slavs.
    Southern Russians and Ukrainians still do not score a lot of West Asian (not more than Poles or Slovaks for example) which means the supposed Iranic thing cannot have been massive.

    If you ever get to order a DNA test, my advice is not to go for Genotek which is the only officially allowed DNA testing company in Russia. Their raw data is shit (V5 chip). Choose FTDNA instead, it's not banned yet.

  3. #233
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Last Online
    Today @ 07:26 PM
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Serb
    Ethnicity
    Serb
    Ancestry
    Dalmatian hinterland
    Country
    Serbia
    Gender
    Posts
    10,918
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 8,460/336
    Given: 6,767/70

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stearsolina View Post
    Even native Balkanites in Serbia proper were between Croatian and Bulgarian IA, and not entirely Thracian like and they were actual Moesians which is a subset of Thracians.
    Your models show Serbs are not native in western Balkans at all, and than you should stop claiming that.

    Truth is though that most western Serbs are native to east Herzegovina and surrounding regions however. It's just that your modeling is very illogical and unrealistic.
    True.
    For example I1-FGC22045 and N-FGC28435 are strong in Krajina Serbs and both are founded in skeletons from Cernica near Gacko (East Herzegovina) from the late middle age https://hercegbosna.org/forum/post1638232.html#p1638232
    Krajina Serbs have tons of matches in East/Old Herzegovina among other haplos as well, and they are linguistically connected with East Herzegovina. There is no linguistic connection between Krajina Serbs and old shtokavian ijekavian ("Montenegrin"), old shtokavian ekavian of central Serbia, Torlakian etc.
    Last edited by Varda; 12-09-2021 at 02:35 PM.

  4. #234
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Dušan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Serb
    Ancestry
    Krajina Serb
    Country
    Serbia
    Y-DNA
    I2a1b-PH908
    Taxonomy
    DinaroPontid + bit BaltoCM influence
    Religion
    Orthodox Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    12,949
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 19,315/97
    Given: 15,034/51

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Varda View Post
    True.
    For example I1-FGC22045 and N-FGC28435 are strong in Krajina Serbs and both are founded in skeletons from Cernica near Gacko (East Herzegovina) from the late middle age https://hercegbosna.org/forum/post1638232.html#p1638232
    Krajina Serbs have tons of matches in East/Old Herzegovina among other haplos as well, and they are linguistically connected with East Herzegovina. There is no linguistic connection between Krajina Serbs and old shtokavian ijekavian ("Montenegrin"), old shtokavian ekavian of central Serbia, Torlakian etc.
    Yes.
    The fact is that "Illyrians" were not homogenous people, those in northwestern part are different, while those of southeast Illyricum is closer to "Thracians".
    In other words, autosomal genetics of pre-Slavic component of Serbs and Croats are different.
    That is fact proven by autosomal genetics.
    🔴
    🔵

  5. #235
    account terminated.
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Last Online
    09-18-2023 @ 03:11 PM
    Ethnicity
    N/A
    Country
    Abkhazia
    Gender
    Posts
    48,253
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 52,620/1,011
    Given: 43,526/788

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dušan View Post
    Yes.
    The fact is that "Illyrians" were not homogenous people, those in northwestern part are different, while those of southeast Illyricum is closer to "Thracians".
    Baseless claim without any proof. Croatian IA sample is from southern area. And IA Apulian is nothing like Thracian as well. Apulia is much more southern than majority of west Balkans.

    In other words, autosomal genetics of pre-Slavic component of Serbs and Croats are different.
    That is fact proven by autosomal genetics.
    Not really. Depends on the region.

  6. #236
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    Dušan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Last Online
    @
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Serb
    Ancestry
    Krajina Serb
    Country
    Serbia
    Y-DNA
    I2a1b-PH908
    Taxonomy
    DinaroPontid + bit BaltoCM influence
    Religion
    Orthodox Christian
    Gender
    Posts
    12,949
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 19,315/97
    Given: 15,034/51

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stearsolina View Post
    Baseless claim without any proof. Croatian IA sample is from southern area. And IA Apulian is nothing like Thracian as well. Apulia is much more southern than majority of west Balkans.
    What about Apulia?
    Are you talking about influence of Roman colonisation?
    Yes, and there is different situation, it was stronger in areas settled with Serbs, than areas with Croats, in area of nortern Croats, no occured at all.


    Not really. Depends on the region.
    Only southern Croats are a bit closer, the rest are not at all.
    Varda would say they are catholicized Serbs.
    Well by genetics it could be.
    🔴
    🔵

  7. #237
    account terminated.
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Last Online
    09-18-2023 @ 03:11 PM
    Ethnicity
    N/A
    Country
    Abkhazia
    Gender
    Posts
    48,253
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 52,620/1,011
    Given: 43,526/788

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dušan View Post
    What about Apulia?
    Are you talking about influence of Roman colonisation?
    Yes, and there is different situation, it was stronger in areas settled with Serbs, than areas with Croats, in area of nortern Croats, no occured at all.
    Apulia sample is from Illyrian tribe that came to Apulia from Dalmatia.
    Northern Croatia had Celts, does not mean there were no Romans there (there were even in Hungary). There is also later Hungarian-German influence.

    Only southern Croats are a bit closer, the rest are not at all.
    Slavonian Croats pre-Slavic is very southern, they just have high Baltic. Outside of Kajkavian area most Illyrian-shifted pre-Slavic seems to be on the Islands.

    Varda would say they are catholicized Serbs.
    Well by genetics it could be.
    Keep dreaming. Here is my 100% north Čakavian friend and he plots like Slavonian and Bosnian Croats (bad raw tho)

    1.89230633 24.40% Ashkenazi + 75.60% South_Polish
    1.91501174 65.60% Southwest_Russian + 34.40% Tuscan
    2.05197081 41.00% Central_Greek + 59.00% Estonian
    2.06836817 40.80% Belorussian + 59.20% Romanian
    2.11068372 63.40% Belorussian + 36.60% Italian_Abruzzo
    2.14019503 62.20% Estonian + 37.80% South_Italian
    2.19374833 64.80% Serbian + 35.20% Southwest_Russian
    2.20844427 60.40% Bulgarian + 39.60% Estonian
    2.20928916 20.60% Italian_Jewish + 79.40% South_Polish
    2.24241227 52.00% Estonian + 48.00% Greek_Thessaly
    2.29117001 60.00% Bulgarian + 40.00% Finnish
    2.36317668 31.00% Belorussian + 69.00% Serbian
    2.37149409 80.60% South_Polish + 19.40% Tunisian_Jewish
    2.38392837 40.20% East_Sicilian + 59.80% Estonian
    2.39902963 20.60% Algerian_Jewish + 79.40% South_Polish
    2.41382230 64.00% Estonian_Polish + 36.00% Italian_Abruzzo
    2.41477149 20.60% Sephardic_Jewish + 79.40% South_Polish
    2.41830483 64.60% Belorussian + 35.40% West_Sicilian
    2.45086013 31.40% Estonian_Polish + 68.60% Serbian
    2.56697423 41.20% Estonian_Polish + 58.80% Romanian
    2.56813092 35.40% Estonian + 64.60% Romanian
    2.63051570 19.20% Libyan_Jewish + 80.80% South_Polish
    2.66311259 67.40% Belorussian + 32.60% South_Italian
    2.69938095 25.60% Lithuanian + 74.40% Serbian
    2.74221854 45.00% Belorussian + 55.00% Bulgarian

    My other Čakavian Croat friend plots like north-western Croats.

    It's not back and white.

  8. #238
    account terminated.
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Last Online
    09-18-2023 @ 03:11 PM
    Ethnicity
    N/A
    Country
    Abkhazia
    Gender
    Posts
    48,253
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 52,620/1,011
    Given: 43,526/788

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Neither all Serbs score tha same, ofc. This Dalmatian Serb pre-Slavic part is more northern than Dušan's.

    Distance to: Nausevar(Serb)

    2.76075908 11.00% Sardinian + 89.00% Serbian
    3.11056430 60.40% Moldavian + 39.60% North_Italian
    3.36782865 58.80% Croatian + 41.20% Tuscan
    3.43118799 52.40% Tuscan + 47.60% Ukrainian_Lviv
    3.56702628 63.80% Moldavian + 36.20% Tuscan
    3.64875643 54.20% Tuscan + 45.80% Ukrainian
    4.09252394 79.60% Moldavian + 20.40% Sardinian
    4.13079957 39.80% Russian_Smolensk + 60.20% Tuscan
    4.21926988 64.60% Croatian + 35.40% West_Sicilian
    4.22393558 55.60% Croatian + 44.40% North_Italian
    4.29585245 35.00% Lithuanian + 65.00% Tuscan
    4.34773798 42.20% Polish + 57.80% Tuscan
    4.36481097 39.40% Estonian_Polish + 60.60% Tuscan
    4.39390138 33.40% Erzya + 66.60% North_Italian
    4.49906036 59.20% Tuscan + 40.80% Ukrainian_Belgorod
    4.57083715 41.20% Southwest_Russian + 58.80% Tuscan
    4.59185750 62.40% North_Italian + 37.60% Ukrainian_Belgorod
    4.62386591 17.80% North_Italian + 82.20% Serbian
    4.66633945 53.40% Ukrainian_Lviv + 46.60% West_Sicilian
    4.73525856 88.00% Serbian + 12.00% Southwest_French
    4.75427856 87.80% Serbian + 12.20% Spanish_Andalucia
    4.76225177 62.20% North_Italian + 37.80% Southwest_Russian
    4.76863779 37.80% Kargopol_Russian + 62.20% Tuscan
    4.77508605 51.60% Ukrainian + 48.40% West_Sicilian
    4.78417356 46.40% South_Polish + 53.60% Tuscan

  9. #239
    Veteran Member Ajeje Brazorf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Last Online
    12-05-2025 @ 01:44 PM
    Ethnicity
    Italian‏‏‎
    Country
    Italy
    Gender
    Posts
    2,495
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 2,786/35
    Given: 9/0

    4 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    There is a possibility that actually the Balkans before the arrival of the Slavs were more west-shifted than modern-day southern Italians, this could also be why Albanians have virtually the same EEF amount as southern Italians despite also having received Slavic input. And there is also the possibility that proto-Slavs had already mixed before reaching the Balkans, and would therefore look more something like Poles with 42 or 43% Baltic rather than Belarusians.

    Spoiler!

  10. #240
    Voskos
    Guest

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Medieval Greeks and their modern descendants.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •