0





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 46,299/1,221 Given: 47,332/2,168 |
Help support Apricity by making a donation



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 118/11 Given: 0/0 |
Dark Ages primarily refer to obscure periods for which written sources are patchy. In Britain it mostly means that between the departure of the Legions and the arrival of the Saxons.
I've never heard it used for the High Mediaeval period as you imply here.
And ignorance and fanaticism is pretty much the natural state of mankind. You and your cousin Marx notwithstanding.
Not a single actual European ethnic group has failed to violently refute that rather insolent claim at some time or other.Ashkenazis are a European ethnic group.
No. Just NO.I was born in England, so I could be called 'English',
Insulting Rumanians, French AND English now. Nice one.though I am not of English descent. I was simply born here. Neither my mother nor my father are English. My mother is Romanian and my father is French. Therefore I am of Romanian and French descent.![]()
They are a group of dual origins. As such, they show a 'pull' from both sides in the mix when placed on such a chart. The European blood that the Jews have absorbed is pulling them closer to us. The same could be said of many Blacks with some Euro ancestry from the slavery period.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 7/4 Given: 0/0 |
Were the Cypriots ever Europeans proper, or just natives of that island next-door to Israel who just happen to speak Greek? I heard many different things from the Greeks on the forum in that other thread, so I'm not really sure what they are.
(I also agree about the Sicilians, I've seen some very racially questionable half-Arab types among them.)
Indeed. I think the question here is: at what point do they stop being Semites and start being Europeans?Ashkenazi Jews - European admixed Semites
So that's pretty much my opinion - some Jews are more European, others are more Semitic.



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 263/12 Given: 0/0 |
I don't think its up for questioning at all. I think a person can not be considered truly European if they are not European in both genetic orientation, mode of conduct(Which includes traditions, cultural rituals and practices, and religious practices), mentality(Which is shaped by the former), and finally language.
Language probably plays the most essential role at a substratum level, but its mutually inclusive as being an important matter along with the previous criteria. If you are Muslim you are not submitting your mode of conduct to the nature of your genetic orientation, which should coincide in possessing a certain European mentality.
A mentality which is extremely hard to form when one acts, believes, and thinks like a Muslim. If anything it is contradictory in its very nature to adhere to Muslim beliefs, and to incorporate it in a European culture by European peoples. This is because Islam was a religion practiced by Non-European peoples in situ.
This means the mentality and language which shaped and constructed the mode of conduct relating to the Islam religion is not European whatsoever. I think that it is resonable enough to say that if a genetic European practices an Eastern religion can not be considered truly European.
A person who practices Christianity though, although it originally takes its root in a Semitic thought and mentality can be considered European. This is because Christianity was structured, integrated and grounded in European cultures going back for almost a 2 whole Milleniums.
It was used as a tool for political, militaristic, cultural, and social affairs. It was shaped by people of largely European descent, at least its core dogma, laws, and doctrine. Its mentality and mode of conduct reflects linguistic nature of the people, which coincides and arose with a people of a certain genetic orientation, namely the European peoples.
I think its quite simple when you think of it, and Pagans and Agnostic/Atheists/Pagans can be considered European as well if they are at least of European origins in a genetic sense. Its impossible to be Jewish, Islam, or Buddisht and to act and be a truly European person if you are one.
Just like its contradictory to be Jewish, and to not believe in the Jewish religion. That said this might be too conservative of a viewpoint, since definitions are expanding in response to the dynamic changes in the social and cultural orientation of European and Jewish peoples in the modern era.





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 46,299/1,221 Given: 47,332/2,168 |
You sure that plot is only for Ashkenazim?Not disagreeing, just checking. But of course Ashkenazim would be closer to Europeans genetically than other Jews, because of long intermixing and living besides Europeans.
Anyroad (Ossieism) good night and have fun. Loki out![]()
Help support Apricity by making a donation


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 56/11 Given: 7/3 |
I disagree with you. Ashkenazim are still the dominant force of Israel. Ashkenazi Jews are like 48% in terms of numbers while Mizrahi/Sephardic are 50% but Ashkenazim still are dominating the politics. However you are wrong cause in the beginning (in the 70's) when the Jews arrived in Israel , Ashkenazim didn't make the effort to distinct Jews by their religious rite , thus Jews from Greece who were Sephardic were counted as Ashkenazim because they came from Nazi occuped Europe and the chief Rabbi of Iraqi Jews was declared as Sephardic chief , despite the rite difference. Now , it has changed. The term Sephardic is only applied to Jews of North African and South European Jewish ancestry because of their clear connection with Spain and it has became a synonym of them. On the other hand Yemenite Jews are never considered as Sephardic , then you have Caucasian Jews who form a community and then all of from Iraq and neighbours areas.





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,616/108 Given: 356/9 |



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 388/22 Given: 59/0 |
Here are some other maps of where Ashkenazis cluster.
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_Ish7688voT.../s1600/pca.jpg
http://theoccidentalobserver.net/tooblog/?cat=36



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 388/22 Given: 59/0 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 391/29 Given: 482/72 |
To be honest, my knowledge about Cypriots is limited.
You mean like him:(I also agree about the Sicilians, I've seen some very racially questionable half-Arab types among them.)
I'd say that Sicilians are one very diverse bunch of people.
Good question: When did they become European? Did they ever become European? I don't know. I'm a bit ambiguous when it comes to the Juice.Indeed. I think the question here is: at what point do they stop being Semites and start being Europeans?
I agree.So that's pretty much my opinion - some Jews are more European, others are more Semitic.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks