0


Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 18,280/95 Given: 14,328/51 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 52,629/1,011 Given: 43,539/788 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 18,280/95 Given: 14,328/51 |
It is surpisingly that one part of one same nation didnt mix with their countrymen from surrounding areas during centuries, and preserve such drastically different autosomal genetic.
Such drastically different autosomal genetic could be preserved between two ethnicities living next to each other, but hard among one same ethnicity.
🔴
🔵
⚪
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 2,868/149 Given: 444/392 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,303/36 Given: 8,600/5 |
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,303/36 Given: 8,600/5 |
Neither me. But this individual is deeply rooted in the surrounding villages of Beeskow city. This is why there is a notable indication for that also other local Germans score like that. Tomenable correctly showed that statistical likelyhood. We don't yet know this and also not the possible geographic extent of this. There are Sorbs nearby and we know that they score more Slavic-like too. In this context it would feel wrong to neglect this find. After Sorbs are a small number there could today even be more Germans than Sorbs scoring like that. Germans are sparsely tested, so we have to pay attention to those who are.
Target: rothaer_scaled
Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085
39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
39.0 Germanic
19.2 Celtic-like
1.8 Graeco-Roman
0.2 Finnic-like
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 23,005/717 Given: 20,151/1,181 |
My point was that we don't even know if they are Sorbs or Germans according to your definition. In academic datasets samples are often labelled based on self-identification. This is what for example Mait Metspalu of the Estonian Biocentre does.
So maybe among these Kamenz Sorbs there are people who said "I'm a Sorb from village XYZ located just west of Kamenz, but Sorbian culture in my village and surrounding villages was suppressed 200 years ago". Just like the Beeskow sample.
Kamenz samples might be Germans according to your criteria. We just don't know.
They got published as Sorbs, but could be German-speaking families for centuries.
Also an ethnic German spouse of a Sorb can be counted as a Sorb in many cases.
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 23,005/717 Given: 20,151/1,181 |
This sample represents not Beeskow alone, but entire region around it, a historic region which shares common demographic history. The region is known in German as Kurmärkisch-Wendischer Distrikt and has a territory of 2174 square kilometers, so it is about as big as Memelland (2828 square kilometers).
This Wendischer Distrikt was part of the Bohemian Crown (Lower Lusatia) until the 16th century - then it became part of Brandenburg.
This area has unique history because no other part of Brandenburg was ruled by Czechs until as late as the 1500s.
Maybe thanks to being ruled by fellow Slavs, Sorbs survived so long in this area, and without German admixture.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks