1
He's shooting himslef in the foot at 1:44. And though he's probably right, we can't make statements like that if we follow the scientific rigour. He's a biologist, not a physicist. And we know next to shit about physics right now. Dawkins isn't qualified to speak abot such things. Valée pointed that out. Hynek pointed that out. At best we can say that we don't know and that's a perfectly reasonable answer when we actually don't. Both hardcorce darwinist like Dawkins and religionists commit to this fallacy to know all the answers.
Bookmarks