Page 62 of 83 FirstFirst ... 125258596061626364656672 ... LastLast
Results 611 to 620 of 825

Thread: German GEDmatch results

  1. #611
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:11 PM
    Location
    Pole position
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Country
    Poland
    Y-DNA
    R1b-BY194358
    mtDNA
    W6a
    Gender
    Posts
    23,847
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 23,113/717
    Given: 20,206/1,181

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stearsolina View Post
    (...)
    You don't know shit but post arrogant comments.

    My goal when looking for kits from Stolp/Lauenburg/Butow etc. was to find such Slavic-descended people.

    I even invested some money into this research, I sponsored two DNA test kits for Klucken Museum in 2019.

    Klucken is where a Slavic group known as Slovincians lived (and in some of neighbouring villages as well).

    Because of the pandemic, they have not tested yet (because they visit Klucken every Summer, but not in 2020 and 2021).

    If Klucken villagers test and turn out to be noticeably more Slavic-shifted than these GEDmatch kits, I'll change my mind.
    Last edited by Peterski; 01-24-2022 at 01:37 AM.

  2. #612
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    rothaer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Eastern German
    Country
    Germany
    Gender
    Posts
    7,743
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 8,341/42
    Given: 8,640/5

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Piotraschke View Post
    "Wenden und Kassuben" from eastern parts of Pommern are clearly a distinct population of their own.
    Yes, they were due to their language when they existed.

    Quote Originally Posted by Piotraschke View Post
    My goal when looking for kits from Stolp/Lauenburg/Butow etc. was to find such Slavic-descended people.
    I know your obsession. You seem not to really have understood that you find Slavic-descended people in roughly half of the German people emeregence area and that the late Germanisation of the Slavs in Eastern Hinterpommern is nothing special but just one later step of what happened continously since abt. 700 years in the frame of the German Ostsiedlung. Now, depending on the exact settlememt history these areas are not homogenous in the aspect of proportion of Slavic ancestry in the population. But the process of ethnic conversion in the Lauenburg-Stolp-Bütow area is not isolated, but has happened in a number of places. If there would be visible a genetically distict population, I would gladly make them a region of their own. Now, the kits from Eastern Hinterpommern are more Slavic-like than these from Western Hinterpommern. The "problem" is, that Central Hinterpommern seems to be intermediate between these two parts, which means that Hinterpommern as for now looks like a section of a cline. In such a case you could always make three (or five or ten) parts with different averages and this is possible here too. Currently we have the province Pommern already split up in Vorpommern and Hinterpommern and the comparably high number of German regions have been criticized as too fine grained. In this context I'm not sure if it's meaningful to split Hinterpommern up in three regions. We have smaller regions, f. i. in Thuringia, but just because we don't know the genetic in Western Thuringia and we want to be careful. But in Hinterpommern it looks like a "normal" cline. More kits are appreciated and they can be re-grouped at any time if there seem to be a factual cause for that. As you know I've no problem with having genetically different regions with visible genetic borders separate, like Upper Silesia and Masuria, which both have very Slavic-like genetics. So I would gladly do the same for Lauenburg-Bütow-Stolp if it turns out to be anything else than a sole continuation of the cline.

    Quote Originally Posted by Piotraschke View Post
    In such case I will discard these kits and I'll use Klucken villagers as a reference for Hinterpommern Slavs.
    Why don't you just use them for what they are, Leba-Kaschuben or Slowinzen? I don't understand why you in a MyTrueAncestry-manner want to project your imaginations to things that you don't know for sure and hence mix facts with educated guesses.
    Target: rothaer_scaled
    Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085

    39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
    39.0 Germanic
    19.2 Celtic-like
    1.8 Graeco-Roman
    0.2 Finnic-like

  3. #613
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:11 PM
    Location
    Pole position
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Country
    Poland
    Y-DNA
    R1b-BY194358
    mtDNA
    W6a
    Gender
    Posts
    23,847
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 23,113/717
    Given: 20,206/1,181

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rothaer View Post
    Yes, they were due to their language when they existed.
    Not only language, also genetics (do you think there was no difference, really?). And they were not the same reproductive community (at least as long as they maintained their Slavic language they married with other Slavic-speakers from neighbouring villages, not with Germans).

    You once said that Germans in West Prussia & Poles in West Prussia differed genetically (I think that was when we discussed my Ancestry.com results when I scored "Pomorze" genetic community, and you wondered what it means, as in your opinion there were two different communities).

    Do you seriously think that Wends/Kashubs and Germans in Pommern were not two different communities, but one?

    Why this difference compared to West Prussian situation?

    Quote Originally Posted by rothaer View Post
    I know your obsession.
    Why an obsession and not a hobby?

    Your search for kits from every small German sub-group is also an obsession, I don't see any difference between our obsessions.

    The difference is maybe that I'm also interested in other ethnicities/populations than my own.

  4. #614
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:11 PM
    Location
    Pole position
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Country
    Poland
    Y-DNA
    R1b-BY194358
    mtDNA
    W6a
    Gender
    Posts
    23,847
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 23,113/717
    Given: 20,206/1,181

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rothaer View Post
    You seem not to really have understood that you find Slavic-descended people in roughly half of the German people emeregence area and that the late Germanisation of the Slavs in Eastern Hinterpommern is nothing special but just one later step of what happened continously since abt. 700 years in the frame of the German Ostsiedlung.
    Maybe I should have been more precise - my goal was to find 100% Wendish-descended people, untouched by the Ostsiedlung.

    I know that all East Germans have West Slavic ancestry, but this is usually around 25-65% admixture, not even close to 100%.

    But in Eastern Hinterpommern as you know there was no any rural Ostsiedlung - just like in case of Latvia & Estonia (Livonia).

    No German peasants settled there. At least not during the Middle Ages.

    So these people should be "living fossils" of Early Medieval Pomeranians.

    Quote Originally Posted by rothaer View Post
    Now, the kits from Eastern Hinterpommern are more Slavic-like than these from Western Hinterpommern. The "problem" is, that Central Hinterpommern seems to be intermediate between these two parts, which means that Hinterpommern as for now looks like a section of a cline.
    That's maybe because in Central Hinterpommern the number of German peasants was about half of that in West Hinterpommern.

    But, as I wrote above, in Eastern Hinterpommern this number was actually zero, as far as I know.

    BTW what do you count as Central Hinterpommern & how do these results look like (how many kits)?

    Quote Originally Posted by rothaer View Post
    In such a case you could always make three (or five or ten) parts with different averages and this is possible here too. Currently we have the province Pommern already split up in Vorpommern and Hinterpommern and the comparably high number of German regions have been criticized as too fine grained. In this context I'm not sure if it's meaningful to split Hinterpommern up in three regions. We have smaller regions, f. i. in Thuringia, but just because we don't know the genetic in Western Thuringia and we want to be careful. But in Hinterpommern it looks like a "normal" cline. More kits are appreciated and they can be re-grouped at any time if there seem to be a factual cause for that. As you know I've no problem with having genetically different regions with visible genetic borders separate, like Upper Silesia and Masuria, which both have very Slavic-like genetics. So I would gladly do the same for Lauenburg-Bütow-Stolp if it turns out to be anything else than a sole continuation of the cline.
    BTW, Draheim Land had no impact on genetics in Pommern? It almost cut Pommern into two parts:

    https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post6370870

    Quote Originally Posted by rothaer View Post
    Why don't you just use them for what they are, Leba-Kaschuben or Slowinzen? I don't understand why you in a MyTrueAncestry-manner want to project your imaginations to things that you don't know for sure and hence mix facts with educated guesses.
    OK, I agree, Leba-Kaschuben/Slowinzen designation is fine. But it is also well-known that they are a remnant of a larger population.
    Last edited by Peterski; 01-24-2022 at 03:33 AM.

  5. #615
    Veteran Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2015
    Last Online
    08-25-2024 @ 01:39 AM
    Ethnicity
    American
    Country
    United States
    Gender
    Posts
    4,886
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 3,872/27
    Given: 7,342/28

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Piotraschke View Post
    And maybe that's why geneticists do not use the category of "ethnicity", but the category of "population".

    And these "Wenden und Kassuben" are not the same population as other Germans from Hinterpommern.

    They are descended from 65,000 "Wenden und Kassuben" who lived in eastern Pommern in 1819 (according to Georg Hassel). Also they did not all magically start to consider themselves German 200 years ago, many of them preserved their Slavicness until the end of Hinterpommern's existence (1945).

    Among these who preserved their Slavic language & identity until post-WW2 times, are Klucken villagers (see below).
    11% of County Stolp, 8.5% of County Lauenburg (according to the data you sent me, and a grand total of about 13,000 people, a good number of whom weren't even native to these counties but to Danzig, Koeslin, and East Prussia) were natives who remained post-WWII. Clearly the vast majority of these areas had come to consider themselves German, either because they actually had German ancestry or because they had "converted."

  6. #616
    account terminated.
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Last Online
    09-18-2023 @ 03:11 PM
    Ethnicity
    N/A
    Country
    Abkhazia
    Gender
    Posts
    48,274
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 52,631/1,011
    Given: 43,539/788

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Piotraschke View Post
    In such case I will discard these kits and I'll use Klucken villagers as a reference for Hinterpommern Slavs.
    No, you don't get to decide. Sample with 38 North Atlantic is certainly not Polish but eastern German. And guess what, it's geneaology says the same.
    Your fantasies and imaginations play no part.

    And you won't get any kind of information about the samples. None.

  7. #617
    Veteran Member Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"

    rothaer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Last Online
    @
    Ethnicity
    German
    Ancestry
    Eastern German
    Country
    Germany
    Gender
    Posts
    7,743
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 8,341/42
    Given: 8,640/5

    3 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Piotraschke View Post
    Not only language, also genetics (do you think there was no difference, really?). And they were not the same reproductive community (at least as long as they maintained their Slavic language they married with other Slavic-speakers from neighbouring villages, not with Germans).

    You once said that Germans in West Prussia & Poles in West Prussia differed genetically (I think that was when we discussed my Ancestry.com results when I scored "Pomorze" genetic community, and you wondered what it means, as in your opinion there were two different communities).

    Do you seriously think that Wends/Kashubs and Germans in Pommern were not two different communities, but one?

    Why this difference compared to West Prussian situation?
    The main difference is that there is a division into Protestants and Catholics in West Prussia, while in Eastern Farther Pomerania basically both groups are Protestants (I know there are exceptions from this).

    Nevertheless the Slavic speakers in Eastern Hinterpommern will have been a separate reproduction community. But due to the continous Germanisation within the frame of Ostsiedlung the nearby Germans will not long ago have been within the same reproduction community as the Protestant Kashubs, because they themselves descend from Slavic speaking Pomeranians. The German Pomeranians will have some old-German admixture, but I assume the same for the Slavic speaking Protestant Kashubs. Protestant Kashubs and nearby German Pomeranians will have been basically the same genetically.

    Based on the current data I have, the population of Lauenburg-Bütow-Stolp looks like a part of the cline just. But I'm open to deviating finds. If they are just a part of the cline you could cut out an arbitrary area, that then would have a deviating average and would look like something of it's own. But without actually being it.

    More data for farther insights is welcomed, of course.
    Last edited by rothaer; 01-24-2022 at 11:25 AM.
    Target: rothaer_scaled
    Distance: 1.0091% / 0.01009085

    39.8 (Balto-)Slavic
    39.0 Germanic
    19.2 Celtic-like
    1.8 Graeco-Roman
    0.2 Finnic-like

  8. #618
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:11 PM
    Location
    Pole position
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Country
    Poland
    Y-DNA
    R1b-BY194358
    mtDNA
    W6a
    Gender
    Posts
    23,847
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 23,113/717
    Given: 20,206/1,181

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stearsolina View Post
    No, you don't get to decide.
    I wasn't talking about Vahaduo, you can label them as you want in Vahaduo.

    I was talking about my own purposes.

    Quote Originally Posted by Stearsolina View Post
    38 North Atlantic is certainly not Polish but eastern German
    Not true, 38 is low for Germans, but Kashubians can have 38 North Atlantic.

    Quote Originally Posted by rothaer View Post
    The German Pomeranians will have some old-German admixture, but I assume the same for the Slavic speaking Protestant Kashubs.
    Based on what do you assume this ??? And what do you mean by old-German, something like from the 1200s ???

    Or German from Altdeutschland?

    Quote Originally Posted by rothaer View Post
    Protestant Kashubs and nearby German Pomeranians will have been basically the same genetically.
    I think this is debatable and I think you have no strong evidence that this is the case.

  9. #619
    account terminated.
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Last Online
    09-18-2023 @ 03:11 PM
    Ethnicity
    N/A
    Country
    Abkhazia
    Gender
    Posts
    48,274
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 52,631/1,011
    Given: 43,539/788

    1 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Piotraschke View Post
    I wasn't talking about Vahaduo, you can label them as you want in Vahaduo.

    I was talking about my own purposes.
    We labeled them what they are, ethnic Germans. Hopefully none will buy your fraudulent data.

    Not true, 38 is low for Germans
    False. It is normal score for Germans, not for for Poles.

    but Kashubians can have 38 North Atlantic.
    Guess what, they are mongrelized with German(ics). That's why only Kashubian member here looks like a stereotype of a German

  10. #620
    Veteran Member
    Apricity Funding Member
    "Friend of Apricity"


    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Last Online
    Today @ 01:11 PM
    Location
    Pole position
    Meta-Ethnicity
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Polish
    Country
    Poland
    Y-DNA
    R1b-BY194358
    mtDNA
    W6a
    Gender
    Posts
    23,847
    Thumbs Up/Down
    Received: 23,113/717
    Given: 20,206/1,181

    0 Not allowed! Not allowed!

    Default

    I use geographic labels not ethnic labels anyway. I will label them what they are, geographically.

    Guess what, they are mongrelized with German(ics).
    Most Poles have some Germanic admixture.

    What distinguishes Kashubians first of all is that they have low amounts of South European DNA.

    If you have low amount of Southern admixtures, your Baltic % and North Atlantic % both go up.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 35
    Last Post: 01-04-2018, 06:47 PM
  2. Replies: 59
    Last Post: 08-11-2017, 03:01 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •