1
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 23 Given: 0 |
Disproportionate representation in corporate leadership and management roles, transnational "diplomatic" organisations (WEF, WHO, UN), early Communist revolutionary organisations and governments as well as other major drivers in the current trajectory towards a seemingly worsening situation of European civilization.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,496 Given: 731 |
It's nearly impossible to answer you correctly in few lines, because the Jewish Question requires lots of readings to understand the total social-economical-cultura-historical processes in West Eurasia for more than 3000 years
The best introduction I can give you is the 3 books of Kevin Macdonald, American academic, the serie named "Culture of Critiques"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cu...ritique_series
We do not drink Coca-Cola three hours before a match
Thumbs Up |
Received: 6,246 Given: 1,444 |
Ironically ,enough, Socialism in Russia failed because Germany attacked Russia instead aiding it.
"To go socialist, then, you need to be reasonably well-heeled, in both the literal and metaphorical senses of the term. No Marxist, from Marx and Engels to Lenin and Trotsky, ever dreamt of anything else. Or if you are not well-heeled yourself, then a sympathetic neighbour reasonably flush in material resources needs to spring to your aid. In the case of the Bolsheviks, this would have meant such neighbours (Germany in particular) having their own revolutions, too. If the working classes of these countries could overthrow their own capitalist masters and lay hands on their productive powers, they could use those resources to save the first workers’ state in history from sinking without trace. This was not as improbable a proposal as it might sound. Europe at the time was aflame with revolutionary hopes, as councils of workers’ and soldiers’ deputies (or soviets) sprang up in cities such as Berlin, Warsaw, Vienna, Munich and Riga. Once these insurrections were defeated, Lenin and Trotstky knew that their own revolution was in dire straits
.
It is not that the building of socialism cannot be begun in deprived conditions. It is rather that without material re-sources it will tend to twist into the monstrous caricature of socialism known as Stalinism..."--Professor Terry Eagleton
"Marx himself, as we shall see, was a critic of rigid dogma, military terror, political suppression and arbitrary state power. He believed that political representatives should be accountable to their electors, and castigated the German Social Democrats of his day for their statist politics. He insisted on free speech and civil liberties, was horrified by the forced creation of an urban proletariat (in his case in England rather than Russia), and held that common ownership in the countryside should be a voluntary rather than coercive process. Yet as one who recognised that socialism cannot thrive in poverty-stricken conditions, he would have understood perfectly how the Russian Revolution came to be lost."--Professor Terry Eagleton
Last edited by JamesBond007; 06-14-2022 at 11:25 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks