0


Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,250/11 Given: 524/7 |
Going off on tangents or telling people to shut up doesn’t make you look smarter.
Answer the fucking question. Do you or don’t you think the Dodecad k12 Caucasus references from the spreadsheet I posted carry E. Eurasian or not?? Or the the Gedrosian references?
If they do then you don’t have a say in the matter. Any sample scoring Caucasus or Gedrosian or S. Indian gets a cut of theirs
If Dilawer was so against Gedmatch why the fuck would he have a couple of calculators hosted there
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,699/66 Given: 8,957/110 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,699/66 Given: 8,957/110 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 15,693/315 Given: 8,913/358 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,699/66 Given: 8,957/110 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 8,699/66 Given: 8,957/110 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 1,250/11 Given: 524/7 |
You’re entitled to your opinion but the Caucasus, Gedrosian or S. Indian components are not entirely W. Eurasian because some of the Caucasus component references such as Balkars, Kumyks, Turks and Nogais do carry significant E. Eurasian.
Same thing for sone of the Gedrosian component S. Asian references they also carry significant E. Eurasian. Same for S. Indian.
Muzh ba staso la tyaro tsakha ra wubaasu
[IMG][/IMG]
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 250/0 Given: 140/0 |
Thumbs Up/Down |
Received: 328/0 Given: 195/0 |
Few ydna evidence I'm aware doesn't support the fact that the Tats are assimilated Talysh. All paternal linages belonged to the local, caucasian branches unlike the Talysh.
Their language is not in the same branch as Talysh either. Don't know how dialects are defined but it is not mutually intelligible with Persian either. I say this as a person who is from an are adjecent to Tats and also have tat relatives.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks