0


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,597/1,010 Given: 43,509/788 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,797/4,816 Given: 7,485/155 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,597/1,010 Given: 43,509/788 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 3,797/4,816 Given: 7,485/155 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 158/0 Given: 72/0 |
You're nothing but a bunch of trolls. This thread is ruined , I could of ignored you and spared this thread but I like to prove people wrongBasically people who have complexes because there lived different populations in Croatia before your peoples arrival. Your complexes are not my problem but go take it out somewhere else.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,597/1,010 Given: 43,509/788 |
There is one pre-Slavic (but post IA iirc) Croatian with E-V13 and genetic profile that fits to Illyrians to my knowledge, but it left a clade with no Balkan descendants. I know for no others.
we have tons of IA samples from Slovenia, Croatia, Albania, some from Montenegro as well as Messapian tribes in Italy and they bore no E-V13 apart from that single sample with dead end clade.
Make of it what you will. If more sample are found with E-V13 one can change their opinion but so far nothing indicates it was an Illyrian marker.


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 158/0 Given: 72/0 |
@Loki
Just look at some of the posts:
Here she makes claims nobody said:
So it is a Roman sample as even the date of the name says AD 571. Claims we are making false impression. Even the date of the sample has been added which I bolded , weather you think it is an Illyrian or not is irrelevant , as if there were no Illyrians during Roman period, but take it to another thread.
Above here she calls me an 'Uncompotent Albo troll' and claims things I never said. 'Sisak' sample is from the Roman period , even the date has been added once again to the name of the sample. She claims it is not like Iron Age Albania but it actually clusters just east of them. Weather you think it is an Illyrian or not is irrelevant, take it to another thread.
Now look at that other person here , claims this calculator is a joke ^ yet does not really specify why
These are some posts they made in this thread. Basically posts that are totally out of context and false accusations.



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 2,449/120 Given: 241/57 |
The Iberian branch of Illyrians and Hellenes (R1b) mixed with the native lineages of the J2 and E-V13 and formed the Illyrians and Hellenes. The Iberian branch spoke a non IE language similar to basque.
The native branch J2 of Illyrians split form the Minoan Greeks in 1450 BC when the Achaeans migrated south and founded the Mycenaean Civilisation.
The primary Iberian marker of the Hellenes ancestors only appears in 1/3 of the population of Classical Greece. The majority of the people were already there before the Iberians who formed the Hellenic invaders of 2200 BC migrated to the Balkans. By the time the Dorians moved south these Iberians were already diluted by a 2/3 Helladic mix and were already speaking Greek.
Illyrian is also a Hybrid of the language of the Enchelenes and the indigenous Italo-Celtic language since the Enhelenes colonised Illyria in 1400 BC.
When the Mycenaean Civilisation was at its height the Celts were Italics was one tribe which derive from an R1b DNA linage that migrated out of Iberia. The language of this linage was Basque. It was their contact with the Greeks that the Celto-Italics changed their language. This is a historical fact recorded by the Romans who claimed Greek decent.
The Tribes of Europe at the time of Ancient Greece and Rome are as follows (based on the founding fathers DNA evidence):
Unmixed Tribes:
Celts - R1b linage (includes all Spaniards, Gauls and Celt's) Slavs - R1a linage (includes all Hungarians, Serbs and Bulgarians) Germanics - I linage Finns - N linage
Mixed Tribes:
Greeks, Illyrians, Thracians, Lydians, Phrygians and Carians


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 52,597/1,010 Given: 43,509/788 |
Putting Iron Age Illyrians and late Antiquity Romans with very different genetics under same label is either deliberate manipulation or just being stupid.
I would say Rizza case is both but more leaning to second.
They need to be clearly separated to see how much you score of one and of other.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks