0
![Not allowed!](images/buttons/up_dis.png)
Thumbs Up |
Received: 1,358 Given: 0 |
They would look the same.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 19,674 Given: 37,448 |
Glad that they banned this Apricity account from Aermachi, the NordoPedo from Italic Retards.
And the answer to the thread question is NO
To Italic Retards members lurking in here: Hi there![]()
Thumbs Up |
Received: 9,837 Given: 5,025 |
Weird thread.
Italians and Iberians have a big phenotypical overlap, so the bulk of the white population in Latam wouldn't look drastically diferent if Italians colonized here instead of the Spaniards and Portuguese.
The only diference is that there would be more dinaric, alpine and East med genetics in Latam, but most white Latinos would look very similar to the current ones.
And unless Italy had unified it's territory in the XV/XVI centuries, I don't think Italian would be the main language south of Rio Grande, but one of the many regional languages of Italy: Sicilian, Lombardian, etc.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,361 Given: 5,538 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,058 Given: 1,000 |
Latin America would be full of Messis and Di Marias instead Agueros and Enzo Fernandez
Thumbs Up |
Received: 19,674 Given: 37,448 |
We just need to compare if white Argentinians (who are mostly of Italian and Spanish stock, not only Italian, but still) are lighter/more blondish and light eyed on average compared to whites from countries like Colombia, Mexico, and to some extent Chile (whose main Euro ancestries are overwhelmingly Spanish). The answer is NO.
Thumbs Up |
Received: 96 Given: 97 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,207 Given: 3 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,207 Given: 3 |
Thumbs Up |
Received: 2,207 Given: 3 |
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks