Are you White or Non-White?

[Mortimer]

I'm a young man of colored decent

First you said you are neither white nor colored, why did you changed your mind because of all the others?

[Laredo]

First you said you are neither white nor colored, why did you changed your mind because of all the others?

Nah, I don't really care. A lot people associate white with beauty, you can still be mixed race and attractive individual.

[Mortimer]

Nah, I don't really care. A lot people associate white with beauty, you can still be mixed race and attractive individual.

Of course, you can be fully SSA or fully East Asian too and attractive. I think black skin is attractive.

[renaissance12]

I'm not albino so I'm not white as 99.99% of european living in Europe or out side Europe..

[oszkar07]

Im a Dreadlock Rasta cheval blanc

[Mejgusu]

I don’t use such words to describe myself, I am just a human. I don’t want to be labeled as white or non white, even worse as people of colour. Though, wog is a pretty good description forme.

[Cassidy1234]

By American standards, maybe, rofl.

[Wunder-Zeichen]

We just live in the same continent, that’s all…

I'm not a smart man, but I know that Europeans don't just live in the same continent. That's all.

https://imgflip.com/i/7fr3fc

[Wunder-Zeichen]

Yes, equivalent to Southern Italians, maybe also with majority of actual such ancestry. Excited other claims are probably ultimately conditioned by a certain religious background or by people who uncritically adopt such statements.

You are correct in your own way, and are correct in more ways than one. But I wouldn't go so far as to say something like that or say that they are equal or are genetically equivalent to or are the same as Southern Italians. Practically every phase of the subject has of course been covered in a number of other venues and other threads, so I’ll be brief and to the point. At the same time, an "angle" or side is important, and even if our topic or the subject of Jewish genetics has been covered in the past, there will always be something new or surprising to say. This material and over-covered topic has been covered in great detail in the literature and at great length by some excellent studies, major and minor, general and specific. And the subject, in fact, has been covered in painstaking detail, with clear facts and thorough reporting, in some previous TA threads. This is the component that was obviously covered in greatest detail in the 'Are Jews a Race' section.

Slavo-Turks, Khazarian Hypothesis, Origins of Zionism: https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post7555636

Sephardic Jew: 91.6% Zagrosian
Arabian Peninsula: 77.0% Zagrosian
Ashkenazi Jew: 33.8% Zagrosian

Ashkenazi Jew: Zagrosian (1200–830 BC) 33.8%

https://i.ibb.co/qNtD6F1/ash.png, https://i.ibb.co/FhHqGZ2/ash2.png

Sephardic Jew: Zagrosian (1200–830 BC) 91.6%
Germanic (100–1000 AD) 5.6%
Northwest African (580–1160 AD) 2.8%

https://i.ibb.co/bgyCcLk/sephard.png, https://i.ibb.co/mDLj8Sy/sephard2.png

Levant, in comparison, is 29.8% Zagrosian (1200–830 BC), 27.4% Turkic (650–1200 AD), 17.0% Mongolic (890–1390 AD), 12.8% Western Steppe Herder (3300–2600 BC), 7.2% Caucasian (3700–1700 BC), and 5.8% Nilo-Saharan.

Here again there are huge inter-racial genetic differences, and the differences are statistically significant. For one thing, the Sephardic Jews are predominantly of Zagrosian origin. "Very much unlike" the two other groups. And in fact much different from other West Asians as well, and even more importantly, carrying significantly more Zagrosian ancestry than even the Arabian peninsula. The Sephardic Jews certainly can lay full claim to the Israelites' legacy, and to the land. Let there be no doubt about this.

https://i.ibb.co/d6jz9vM/lev.png

And here's some more comparisons with West-Asian and Caucasian populations. As is well known, the more comparisons that are made, the higher the probability that some of them will be "statistically significant".

The Arabian Peninsula: 77.0% Zagrosian (1200–830 BC), 23.0% Malagasy

https://i.ibb.co/415yR77/arab.png

Iran and Iraq: 91.4% Indus Valley Civilization (3000–1970 BC), 8.2% Mongolic (890–1390 AD), 0.4% Hadza

https://i.ibb.co/wh4wsJw/iran.png

That a close genetic affinity exists between Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations. (But, like SelfDecode, I wouldn't include Ashkenazis in the Middle Eastern cluster). That European populations form a distinct genetic cluster. And that the Ashkenazis, of all the Jewish populations, are closest to South European populations (specifically the Greeks) and also to the Turks.

Basically we can say that Ashkenazis fall outside of the two clusters, that is, the Middle Eastern and White European clusters, and that they are essentially, as Paul Wexler describes them, a "Slavo-Turkic people" in search of an identity.

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...4#post7542414p

Genetic Affinities Among Populations

Sub-Saharan Africans, North Africans, and Europeans form three distinct clusters.
And the Jews form a fairly compact cluster between the North Africans and Europeans.

Attachment 118616

https://imgflip.com/i/7ezlx2
https://defenceforumindia.com/attach...er-png.128276/
https://defenceforumindia.com/thread...6#post-2112829
https://archive.4plebs.org/pol/searc...6u1_LUrfQv4NA/
https://img.4plebs.org/boards/pol/im...7004300563.png

See Also: The Mongol In Our Midst

Vladimir Lenin was mostly Russian. But he also came from mixed ancestry, and he was of Kalmyk blood, from his father's side of the family. Francis Graham Crookshank, a British epidemiologist, and a medical and psychological writer, made the observation in 1931 in his book, "The Mongol in Our Midst: A Study of Man and His Three Faces", that if for the sake of argument we admit Dr Kagan's case as an imbecile mongoloid, we must again enquire why it should be that a people, such as the Jews, either so infiltrated with Mongolian blood or so moulded by centuries of contact with Mongolian peoples as are the Ashkenazim, should produce at most so very few imbecile mongoloids as appears to be the case, even if we admit as authentic every instance put forward. Yes, there are those who so persistently declare that imbecile mongoloids are common amongst the Jews. But they fail, rather spectacularly, to produce their evidence, and must not claim that they have proved their case! If and when, he says, I am shown the record of such a case, I will expect the evidence or presumption of partial Mongolian ancestry to be strong. But the point of greatest interest to him is why there are not so many "typical" imbecile mongoloids of "pure" Jewish descent as to place the fact of their occurrence beyond dispute? One thing, however, is certain, and it can be proved beyond all doubt. Crookshank expands on this point to argue that no one has yet claimed to have seen or have heard of, any imbecile mongoloid born to non-Jewish parents who are pure Semites: no one has yet claimed to have seen or to have heard of an imbecile mongoloid born to Jewish parents, in respect of whose ancestry there is not the strongest presumption of admixture in historic times, with Mongolian blood, through the Khazars, or other people of Mongolian provenance. But at the same time he thinks that cases of dementia praecox, and idiots and imbeciles of the microcephalic type are extremely frequent amongst the Jews, and they will thus not be denied. However, his impression is that dementia praecox, or puberal insanity allied with a definitely chimpanzoid physique, is more frequent amongst the Jews than amongst the so-called "Nordic" Gentiles. He added that his impression was that Jews of the negroid type or, rather, Jews with some negroid characters – prognathism, fuzzy hair, and so on – are more frequently seen amongst the Sephardim than amongst the Ashkenazim.

https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...98#post7694298

[Wunder-Zeichen]

AJ are as Jews/non white as non AJ.

By no means are they (AJs) as Jewish as non-AJs or Middle Eastern Jews. It has been proven time and again, and as has been proven below.

Sephardic Jew: 91.6% Zagrosian
Arabian Peninsula: 77.0% Zagrosian
Ashkenazi Jew: 33.8% Zagrosian

These truths are self-evident. And I repeat this truth: That a close genetic affinity exists between Jewish and Middle Eastern non-Jewish populations. (But I wouldn't include Ashkenazis in the Middle Eastern cluster). That European populations form a distinct genetic cluster. And that the Ashkenazis, of all the Jewish populations, are closest to South European populations (specifically the Greeks) and also to the Turks.

You are correct in your own way, and are correct in more ways than one. But I wouldn't go so far as to say something like that or say that they are equal or are genetically equivalent to or are the same as Southern Italians. Practically every phase of the subject has of course been covered in a number of other venues and other threads, so I’ll be brief and to the point. At the same time, an "angle" or side is important, and even if our topic or the subject of Jewish genetics has been covered in the past, there will always be something new or surprising to say. This material and over-covered topic has been covered in great detail in the literature and at great length by some excellent studies, major and minor, general and specific. And the subject, in fact, has been covered in painstaking detail, with clear facts and thorough reporting, in some previous TA threads. This is the component that was obviously covered in greatest detail in the 'Are Jews a Race' section.

Slavo-Turks, Khazarian Hypothesis, Origins of Zionism: https://www.theapricity.com/forum/sh...=1#post7555636