My Illustrative DNA results

[Flamingo]

Bronze Age:

Fit: 2.589 (Good)

Central Steppe (2100–1800 BC)65.2%

European Farmer (6300–2800 BC)32.8%

East Siberian (1000–900 BC)1.6%

Northwest African (5200–4900 BC)0.4%


Iron Age:

1.543 (Good)

Germanic (AD 100–600)46.4%

Insular Celt (600 BC–AD 100)21.8%

Italic and Etruscan (900–200 BC)14.0%

Paeonian (750–100 BC)12.6%

Balto-Slavic (900–350 BC)2.4%

Central Siberian (2400–2000 BC)1.4%

Berber (760–540 BC)0.6%

East Siberian (1000–900 BC)0.4%

Liao River (1050–350 BC)0.4%


Migration Period

Fit: 0.925 (Very Good)

Germanic (AD 100–630)35.6%

Roman Britain (AD 100–400)27.2%

Roman Gaul (AD 130–500)16.4%

Roman Illyria (AD 100–600)7.8%

Volga (AD 200–400)7.4%

Roman Sardinia (AD 400–500)2.2%

Roman North Africa (AD 120–220)1.6%

Old Bering Sea Culture (AD 200–1330)1.0%

Roman Iberia (AD 260–500)0.4%

Roman Pannonia (AD 130–600)


Middle Ages

Fit: 0.964 (Very Good)

Insular Celt (AD 100–1000)32.4%

Germanic (AD 700–1000)29.4%

Italian (AD 650–1450)13.6%

France (AD 130–1400)10.6%

Volga (AD 200–400)5.6%

Slavic (AD 540–1270)3.2%

Iberian (AD 300–1200)2.6%

Saami (AD 300–800)1.8%

North African (AD 580–1160)0.4%

Japanese (AD 540–1850)0.4%

[Flamingo]

Ancient Populations Mixed Mode

[Eurafricanid]

Bronze Age:

Fit: 2.589 (Good)

Central Steppe (2100–1800 BC)65.2%

European Farmer (6300–2800 BC)32.8%

East Siberian (1000–900 BC)1.6%

Northwest African (5200–4900 BC)0.4%


Iron Age:

1.543 (Good)

Germanic (AD 100–600)46.4%

Insular Celt (600 BC–AD 100)21.8%

Italic and Etruscan (900–200 BC)14.0%

Paeonian (750–100 BC)12.6%

Balto-Slavic (900–350 BC)2.4%

Central Siberian (2400–2000 BC)1.4%

Berber (760–540 BC)0.6%

East Siberian (1000–900 BC)0.4%

Liao River (1050–350 BC)0.4%


Migration Period

Fit: 0.925 (Very Good)

Germanic (AD 100–630)35.6%

Roman Britain (AD 100–400)27.2%

Roman Gaul (AD 130–500)16.4%

Roman Illyria (AD 100–600)7.8%

Volga (AD 200–400)7.4%

Roman Sardinia (AD 400–500)2.2%

Roman North Africa (AD 120–220)1.6%

Old Bering Sea Culture (AD 200–1330)1.0%

Roman Iberia (AD 260–500)0.4%

Roman Pannonia (AD 130–600)


Middle Ages

Fit: 0.964 (Very Good)

Insular Celt (AD 100–1000)32.4%

Germanic (AD 700–1000)29.4%

Italian (AD 650–1450)13.6%

France (AD 130–1400)10.6%

Volga (AD 200–400)5.6%

Slavic (AD 540–1270)3.2%

Iberian (AD 300–1200)2.6%

Saami (AD 300–800)1.8%

North African (AD 580–1160)0.4%

Japanese (AD 540–1850)0.4%

You should select what region you're from or maybe are going to be the best for you.

[Flamingo]

You should select what region you're from or maybe are going to be the best for you.

Thanks, but I notice the regional break down ignores my East European ancestry completely. My great uncle`s autosomal DNA is mostly Balto-Slavic according to (uploaded) DNA tests. Also I noticed that his fit goes from good to bad when I change his region to North Western Europe. While it is true that this region shows my main ancestry, it fails to show my minor ancestry.

[Flamingo]

This is my North West European result:

Fit: 1.514 (Good)

Germanic (AD 700–1000)53.4%

France (AD 130–1400)42.6%

Insular Celt (AD 100–1000)4.0%


And this is my West/ East Slavic and Hungarian result:

Fit: 1.478 (Good)

Germanic (AD 700–1000)74.0%

Balkans (AD 500–1000)24.2%

Magyar1.8%


vs my great uncle

North Western European:

Fit: 5.408 (Bad)

Germanic (AD 700–1000)85.6%

France (AD 130–1400)14.4%


East/ West Slavic and Hungarian:

Fit: 1.489 (Good)

Slavic (AD 540–1270)51.0%

Germanic (AD 700–1000)24.0%

Magyar11.4%

Balkans (AD 500–1000)9.6%

Turkic (AD 650–1200)4.0%

[Eurafricanid]

Thanks, but I notice the regional break down ignores my East European ancestry completely. My great uncle`s autosomal DNA is mostly Balto-Slavic according to (uploaded) DNA tests. Also I noticed that his fit goes from good to bad when I change his region to North Western Europe. While it is true that this region shows my main ancestry, it fails to show my minor ancestry.

But I said to you that the best region for you would be Central Europe, so why don't you use it?

[Flamingo]

But I said to you that the best region for you would be Central Europe, so why don't you use it?

Still my global results are much better (Fit: 0.964 (Very Good)). Also my great uncle´s results are: just Fit: 3.662 (Moderate). How can I trust it, when it is worse even for my great uncle? But here we go:

Me:

Fit: 1.249 (Good)

Germanic (AD 700–1000)66.2%

Italian (AD 650–1450)19.6%

France (AD 130–1400)10.6%

Slavic (AD 540–1270)3.6%


vs great uncle

Fit: 3.662 (Moderate)


Slavic (AD 540–1270)61.6%

Germanic (AD 700–1000)35.4%

Italian (AD 650–1450)3.0%

[Eurafricanid]

Still my global results are much better (Fit: 0.964 (Very Good)). Also my great uncle´s results are: just Fit: 3.662 (Moderate). How can I trust it, when it is worse even for my great uncle? But here we go:

Me:

Fit: 1.249 (Good)

Germanic (AD 700–1000)66.2%

Italian (AD 650–1450)19.6%

France (AD 130–1400)10.6%

Slavic (AD 540–1270)3.6%


vs great uncle

Fit: 3.662 (Moderate)


Slavic (AD 540–1270)61.6%

Germanic (AD 700–1000)35.4%

Italian (AD 650–1450)3.0%

Is your great uncle german? The fit doesn't matter that much when it's below 2.0.

[Flamingo]

Is your great uncle german? The fit doesn't matter that much when it's below 2.0.

You mean al distances below 2 are equally good? My great uncle is half German.

[Eurafricanid]

You mean al distances below 2 are equally good? My great uncle is half German.

And the other half is?