Ask rothaer anything

[rothaer]

Is Claus Von Stauffenberg considered an anti-Nazi fighter?

Simplified yes, but he wasn't necessarly an anti-nationalsocialist. He was a pronounced German patriot that wanted to get rid of a very harmful tyrant that was on his way to destroy an over 1000 years old empire and the living conditions of its people.

[Abti]

rothaer has aired me im big sad

[Abti]

How do you feel about excessive hair …on women?

[rothaer]

Do you consider Germans to be an ethnicity or a pan-ethnic identification?

As an ethnicity. Btw. it's my unconditional identity.

As there were always people like Bavarians who saw themselves as closer to Austrians than to Germans,

Bavarians and Austrians are subdivisions of Germans (in fact Austrians except Vorarlbergers and maybe Burgenlanders are tribally Bavarians). So you statement is comparable to saying that Potsdamers see themselves closer to Berliners than to Germans.

the Tyroleans likewise tend not to see themselves as Germans, and the Swiss were already mentioned in the thread, do you think it would be more correctly to think of Germans as a nation composed of several different ethnic groups? [/QUOTE]

No. You do have assignments on many levels, tribally, regionally, micro regionally and on a village level. German is the assignment on that level that ic called ethnicity. Btw. I consider this the by far most relevant one because a people does exist in the form a reproduction community and that is much defined by a common ethnicity (regardless of that there are also a number of more restricted marriage circles like socially, regionally, tribally, religiously etc. defined ones.)

Do you think it would have its benefits if Bavaria united with Austria instead of with Germany?

The wohle of Germany should be united and - as you mybe know - Austria already two times has impressively declared its wish to again be part of a common German state, in 1919 and in 1938, and only our enemies hinder it from that in order to make Germans more mightyless (divide et impera). Currently the Austrian state treaty expressly forbides the German re-unification. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austrian_State_Treaty

To me any forced division of Germany is wrong (violating the right of self-determination of people) and how the divisions are, is of less importance. Maybe a joining of Bavaria and Austria would make more clear that Austria is part of Germany so that could be a benefit regarding a future German re-unification, yes. I'd even like to add some odd things like Hesse to that state for making it even more clear. And the FRG should stop to call itself Germany. That word "Deutschland" was imposed on Western Germany (when the FRG was constituted in 1949 under supervision of our western opponents) in order to identify this smallest "Germany" in with Germany. No other German state in history was so cheeky to have the name "Deutschland" in its official name and by that exclude all other Germans from Germany.

And the last thing: how do you see the future of Germany (especially in respect to many non-European immigrants)?

This problem will have to be solved or my people will cease to exist. Even if the chance would be just 1% its worth every effort and even the sacrifice of one's own (individual) life, simply because the death of one's people is no alternative to its life. It's comparable with someone having cancer. Such an individual will use whatever small chance he has to survive because death is no alternative.

Regardless of this I think that there will be a big change in political trends and fashion and that will go farther than what most people can imagine today. There are a lot of historical examples for that. The question is how big the damage will be till this happens. I prefer not to go into details regarding the immigrants.

[Ugo]

Do you count the children in the evening? Who is back and who is not? What apartment or house do you live in, how many square meters? What is your relationship with your ex-wife? Did you break up with her easily and under what circumstances? Did you cheat on her or why?

[Ugo]

How do you feel about mixed Germans? Who mixed with the Turks, for example. How do you raise children, do you punish them physically? Are you imposing a nationalist agenda on children? Or do you give them a choice? I am interested in these questions.

[rothaer]

I know that you consider the loss of the Ostgebiete by Germany after WW2 as an injustice, or even as a crime.

As I told many times I consider particularly the expulsion of Germans and the looting of their property a crime. You ignore those points. The belonging to a particular state is another thing. F. i. when North Schleswig came to Denmark or Eupen-Malmedy to Belgium the German population - of course - could stay in their homeland, have various language rights etc. and were neither expulsed nor looted.
Besides this annecting another state's territory is also not right, maybe a crime, but the far smaller one.

So I have a question - why do you not consider it as an adequate punishment for earlier German crimes?

Punishment and guilt are individual matters. No one is guilty for something that he has not done, no one can be punished for something that he has not done. To me and every individual with a sense for right and wrong that is banal. So punishments for crimes are to be done on an individual level and they also to a certain part were.

During WW2 Germany both committed and intended to commit terrible crimes to the Poles and Poland.
That included the "Generalplan Ost" which was an intended crime aimed at destroying the Poles completely.

"Germany" can not intend anything, it's a country, but the various German leaders at that time did, yes.

Why do you think that losing the Ostgebiete was a crime, rather than an adequate punishment for earlier German crimes?

Se above. Only individuals can be guilty and subjects to punishment. It would be crazy to want to "punish" arbitrary Russians, Ukrainians and Estonians for what Stalin did.

And if you think that losing the Ostgebiete was not an adequate punishment, then what alternative punishment do you suggest?

Considering that crime and guilt is in the whole civilised world an individual matter, why should the German population of the Ostgebiete become punished? For what? What deeds did they do that make them deserve to lose their homeland and to be stripped of all property?

Do you think that the Germans did not deserve to be punished for the crimes they committed and intended to commit in WW2?

These who committed crimes derserve that and those who did not, not. The intention alone is never a crime (not even regarding a murder), but a try is.

Basically, how would you punish Germany for WW2 if you were the decision-maker, instead of Stalin, Roosevelt and Churchill?

I would not punish "Germany", I would punish individuals if they committed crimes that I did not also commit. If the Royal Air Force is aming at and intentionally killing hundreds of thousands of German civilians then a German soldier killing English civilians is still a criminal but I'm not sure that one that did the same is the really convincing judge for that. I would restore the order along my imaginations and impose reparations to the German state.

I see no basis for any annexion (let alone committing the crimes of expulsions and lootings to arbitrary Germans). Actually the US did something like that after the first Gulf war. Kuwait was freed and the threat was militarically banned but that did not justify anyone to annex something from Iraq and it was also not done.

[rothaer]

What does « rothær » exactly mean?

It's a pseudonym and the intention of a pseudonym is to not openly unveil the own identity. It is a surname of an ancestor of mine from 10 generations ago that I found cool and that I can identify with.

Red hair?

Actually yes. The original name was Rothaar and after there had come a lot of Dutch folks to Hamburg in that period of time their spelling habits somewhat spread and that way Rothaar became spelled Rothaer whithout any change in pronounciation.

How do pronounce it and what made you choose it for your username?

Rot-Haar.

What other [user]names were you thinking of?

I prefer not to answer because I maybe will use them at some time.

[rothaer]

How do you feel about excessive hair …on women?

Hair where, on the head, in the arm pits, on the pussy, on the legs? I prefer no shaving on women which not means that there might never be too much hair. As for body hair I think I would be fine with 85% of all women. 15% could have too much to my taste.

[Ugo]

My sister did her doctoral work in medicine in Germany, the city of Kiel. She's very smart, unlike me. The Germans respected her very much, because she passed 60% of the discoveries in their joint work autoimmune. The doctoral work turned out. In corrupt Russia, about 5 people (senior officials) defended their doctoral dissertation in medicine immediately at its opening. At the same time, she personally wrote them a doctor's dissertation so as not to starve to death. Only 20 years later she became a doctor of sciences on her dissertation in Russia. I think those Germans who worked with her are already very rich and successful, but she earns a month the same as I am stupid for 1 day. Here's Russia for you. Arrogance, corruption, which lives at the expense of smart Russian people. Russians have a lot of smart people, but our mentality is ugly, I hate it.