0






| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 522/2 Given: 245/1 |
On G25 Modern I get:
Target: Polak_scaled
Distance: 2.7422% / 0.02742217
48.6 Lithuanian_VZ
30.6 Lithuanian_PZ
15.8 Macedonian
3.0 Spanish_Pais_Vasco
1.0 Biaka
0.6 Igorot
0.4 Mbuti
Target: Polak_scaled
Distance: 2.8137% / 0.02813680 | ADC: 0.25x RC
67.2 Lithuanian_VZ
22.4 Slovenian
9.0 Sorb_Niederlausitz
1.4 Biaka
Is it fair to say that the "Lithuanian_VZ" sample is heavily Slavic and most likely ethnically Polish? I was really surprised by the high Macedonian, because they are only about half or so Slavic, if not less.
Slavic (AD 540–1270) 64.0%
Baltic (AD 260–540) 21.2%
Germanic (AD 100–630) 7.6%
European Jew (AD 1160–1400) 6.0%
Sinitic (1230 BC–AD 1670) 1.2%
Fit: 2.626



| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 6,249/169 Given: 1,440/2 |





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,198/102 Given: 659/63 |
Your southern admixture is increasing, because results are with only Lithuanian as Slavic to get closer distances, this is problem with modelling us Eastern Europeans on G25. You also got increased Macedonian instead of getting smaller Ashkenazi. Interesting is your African, which shows on G25 as well as Gedmatch.
Examples of overfitting, I can be modelled as 75% North Slavic + 25% Bulgarian === 87,5% North Slavic + 1/16 Bulgarian + 1/16 Levantine === 50% Lithuanian + 50% Bulgarian
Macedonians and Bulgarians are 40% Slavic on average. Other part are Eastern Mediterranean ( Anatolian, Thracian ) genes and about 3-5% Nomadic Turkic in Bulgarians only
It no longer works with myheritage raw data, no?





| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 1,198/102 Given: 659/63 |


| Thumbs Up/Down |
| Received: 518/4 Given: 108/0 |
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Bookmarks